Jump to content

Hero , villain kottukoni comedian ni sorry cheppamannattu undhi


JustChill_Mama

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, snoww said:

Netizens supported srinivas vuncle anta. Anduke called him back anta. Vichaaram vyaktham sesadu anta srinivas vuncle , that is enough ani briefed boothu kittu vuncle.

broker gallaki broker reasoning untadi obviously

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, snoww said:
  • విష్ణుపై అమరావతి జేఏసీ నేత దాడి
  • హైదరాబాద్‌లో ఘటన.. బెజవాడలో కేసు

విజయవాడ, ఫిబ్రవరి 26 (ఆంధ్రజ్యోతి): బీజేపీ రాష్ట్ర ప్రధాన కార్యదర్శి విష్ణువర్ధన్‌ రెడ్డిపై అమరావతి జేఏసీ నేత కొలికలపూడి శ్రీనివాసరావు ‘ప్రమాదకరమైన ఆయుధం’తో దాడి చేశారని విజయవాడ పోలీసులకు ఫిర్యాదు అందింది. ఈనెల 23న హైదరాబాద్‌లోని ‘ఏబీఎన్‌-ఆంధ్రజ్యోతి’ స్టూడియోలో జరిగిన చర్చ సందర్భంగా శ్రీనివాసరావు బీజేపీ నేత విష్ణువర్ధన్‌ రెడ్డిపై చెప్పు విసిరిన సంగతి తెలిసిందే. దీనిపై ఆ పార్టీ నేత వామరాజు సత్యమూర్తి శుక్రవారం రాత్రి విజయవాడ వన్‌టౌన్‌ పోలీసులకు ఫిర్యాదు చేశారు.

 

‘చెప్పు’ అని చెప్పకుండా... ప్రమాదకరమైన ఆయుధంతో కుట్రపూరితంగా దాడి చేశారని ఫిర్యాదులో పేర్కొన్నారు. దీనిపై పోలీసులు ఐపీసీ 324, 506 సెక్షన్ల కింద కేసు నమోదు చేశారు. సత్యరాజు రాసి ఇచ్చిన ఫిర్యాదులోని సారాంశాన్నే ఎఫ్‌ఐఆర్‌లో పొందుపరిచారు. ప్రస్తుతానికి విజయవాడలో కేసు నమోదు చేసినప్పటికీ, దాడి జరిగింది హైదరాబాద్‌ కావడంతో తర్వాత అక్కడికి బదిలీ చేస్తామని ఓ పోలీసు అధికారి చెప్పారు.

good. vishnuvardhan reddy direct ga hyd lo cheyyalisindhi. Ekkada incident jarighithe akkada chesthaadu evadanna. Party yelli vjw lo cheyyadamendhi. Anyway india itself is a very confusing country mostly.

inka ABN meedha edupu endhuku. Let police take care of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

If a grown adult like vishnu vardhan reddy who got the cheppu dabba is not filing a case why would ABN do ? is vishnucardhan reddy a child of ABN ?

He won't file case directly since it will be projected as direct attack on amaravati farmers by pulka media. Someone else already filed it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChinnaBhasha said:

he might do it, just wait. 

In my opinion he should file case on abn too, they are also responsible for that incident. 

yea let him file case on abn too. infact if any injury happens in sakshi office a case must be filed on jagan. ANything happens in a political rally a case must be filed on party president.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, snoww said:

He won't file case directly since it will be projected as direct attack on amaravati farmers by pulka media. Someone else already filed it. 

chaa...calling Dr Srinivas as paid artist is not a direct attack on amaravati but filing a case on an assualt which everyone saw on tv is a direct attack?. Bhale vuntayira by logics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Telugodura456 said:

chaa...calling Dr Srinivas as paid artist is not a direct attack on amaravati but filing a case on an assualt which everyone saw on tv is an assault. Bhale vuntayira by logics.

It's just my guess for reason he didn't filed case. There is difference between accusing in a talk show vs officially filing a court case.  If you have the better reason feel free to post it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, snoww said:

It's just my guess for reason he didn't filed case. There is difference between accusing in a talk show vs officially filing a court case.  If you have the better reason feel free to post it. 

I think he is a coward to fight his own battles directly. He pushed it on to party in VJW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

yea let him file case on abn too. infact if any injury happens in sakshi office a case must be filed on jagan. ANything happens in a political rally a case must be filed on party president.

yes, if sakshi invites someone for debate, and makes the opposite candidate attack the person, and don't want to hold any responsibility for it.. case should be filed against sakshi too if that happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, snoww said:

He won't file case directly since it will be projected as direct attack on amaravati farmers by pulka media. Someone else already filed it. 

direct file chesina nashtamem ledu. amaravati issue is a comedy issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ChinnaBhasha said:

yes, if sakshi invites someone for debate, and makes the opposite candidate attack the person, and don't want to hold any responsibility for it.. case should be filed against sakshi too if that happens. 

what do you mean by "makes the opposite candidate attack".  it sounds like an allegation that needs evidence. I thought you were arguing ABN gets automatic responsibility because it happened in their studio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

what do you mean by "makes the opposite candidate attack".  it sounds like an allegation that needs evidence. I thought you were arguing ABN gets automatic responsibility because it happened in their studio.

yeah, because they don't want to take any action against it. 

If a friend invites you to his home, and some unknown person there attacks you, and your friend don't want to take any responsibility for it, don't you hold him responsible too, for whatever happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

what do you mean by "makes the opposite candidate attack".  it sounds like an allegation that needs evidence. I thought you were arguing ABN gets automatic responsibility because it happened in their studio.

Or ABN should inform the debatants, there might be physical attacks if they don't like opposite person argument in their studio, and should ask to come only if they are ok with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ChinnaBhasha said:

yeah, because they don't want to take any action against it. 

If a friend invites you to his home, and some unknown person there attacks you, and your friend don't take any responsibility for it, don't you hold him responsible too, for whatever happened. 

They ended the debate right there - did they not ? They expressed vicharam, the anchor apologized to viewers. They said they will cooperate if bjp files any charges. They banned srinivas from any live debates in future. I thinks thats reasonable enough.

If you invite two grown guests - respectable members of society and one of them takes to violence(a very small violence ofcourse with no real injury at all). You apologize to other guest ban inviting the guest to any future parties with other guests involved. Sounds decent enough to me. Intha kanna yem chesthaar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...