Jump to content

Think of Rafales this way


Recommended Posts

Posted

We say how much gas is used in commuting, not how much is lost

we say how much electricity used each month, not how much lost

same with water etc

materials like jets purpose is to use them when needed in operations, and when it’s used/dead, you replace with new one

jets are lost only if they crash outside conflicts

 

Posted

The problem is not about loosing arsenal wen it served the purpose, but give reasons for truce and details. For gods sake we are democracy and needs transparency on our tax rupee

Posted

Yes details will be given once conflict ends, as per military policy commissions will look into losses and then disclose. What is the hurry? 
 

Think if irs asks you to file tax return each day 12am for income and expenses for that day, instead of once in a year.

Why to expect military to disclose assets loss each day or during the conflict?  They will do it when doing so is not advantage to enemy. 

 

  • Upvote 2
Posted

Okay, so u think conflict didn’t end and yet u called truce. (Truce means end of fiscal year in ur irs terms of war  and u can do itemizations later but first disclose ur earnings)

Posted

It is called ‘pause’ for a reason. after it truly ends, they will disclose losses when they feel it no longer puts India at disadvantage disclosing losses.

lets say for example India lost all 36 rafale jets on May 7th, why do you want to disclose now? Paxton can plan next attack knowing India doesn’t have any advanced jets left. You buy another 50 new jets and then disclose previous 36 losses so that it is no longer advantage for enemy.

Posted
5 hours ago, gutlogummadi said:

Okay, so u think conflict didn’t end and yet u called truce. (Truce means end of fiscal year in ur irs terms of war  and u can do itemizations later but first disclose ur earnings)

The conflict did not end yet, will be bigger conflict soon. 

Posted

Too many erri fools.hold your piss. Everything will be revealed unlike China or porkis.

Posted
7 hours ago, gutlogummadi said:

The problem is not about loosing arsenal wen it served the purpose, but give reasons for truce and details. For gods sake we are democracy and needs transparency on our tax rupee

I am also feeling the same, Most of Pak's bots in dark web saying it is a covert operation by India ani.. when the Pulwama attack happened the same bots openly supported their attacks here they are not doing the same. also i am not seeing much hatred spewed as it used be in previous attacks. I think US might have got some proofs related to this that's why our erri Pushpams went for truce instantly... Our journalists need to look into this angle and start investigating...  

Posted
25 minutes ago, Joker_007 said:

I am also feeling the same, Most of Pak's bots in dark web saying it is a covert operation by India ani.. when the Pulwama attack happened the same bots openly supported their attacks here they are not doing the same. also i am not seeing much hatred spewed as it used be in previous attacks. I think US might have got some proofs related to this that's why our erri Pushpams went for truce instantly... Our journalists need to look into this angle and start investigating...  

It was always escalatory ladder. Simple . It was never banging in war.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...