futureofandhra Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 1 hour ago, Anta Assamey said: Inko sari ilanti question adigite... Ram Mohan Naidu ni Cabinet lo ki teesukunna MODI kuda resign cheyali ani post vesta... Adhi jarigedhi kadhuley Train accidents jarigina vatiki railway Minister Industrial safety incidents ki industry Minister Low quality infra ki roads ministry Evadu resign chesina same thing repeats Remember those boat accidents and stampedes India have zero value on safety issue Root cause is different Unless the entire structure changes these fail overs won't change I think you should post entire cabinet to resign for this Quote
CanadianMalodu Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 18 minutes ago, Sam480 said: Insaneclown271 •6h ago Wing looked clean. Dual engine failure/ stall is all I can think of… at this stage. NOT THE WING, the flaps. I asked ChatGpt to draw me the pics to show you This is how it should have looked. The lift with retracted flaps is dangerous. It can stall the aircraft. Then the pilot says "Engine failure". Quote
Joker_007 Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 1 hour ago, psycontr said: Papam AIr India Private company ani marchipoyinattu unnadu.. Quote
akkum_bakkum Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 Just now, futureofandhra said: Adhi jarigedhi kadhuley Train accidents jarigina vatiki railway Minister Industrial safety incidents ki industry Minister Low quality infra ki roads ministry Evadu resign chesina same thing repeats Remember those boat accidents and stampedes India have zero value on safety issue Root cause is different Unless the entire structure changes these fail overs won't change I think you should post entire cabinet to resign for this Scan the bags..maakem sambandham antunna cabinet Quote
Sam480 Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 12 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said: NOT THE WING, the flaps. I asked ChatGpt to draw me the pics to show you This is how it should have looked. The lift with retracted flaps is dangerous. It can stall the aircraft. Then the pilot says "Engine failure". Quote
CanadianMalodu Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 2 minutes ago, Sam480 said: Thrust loss is undeniably due to "engine failure". Quote
futureofandhra Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 2 minutes ago, Sam480 said: Am suspecting software glitch that might have blocked control systems Quote
Popular Post Bendapudi_english Posted June 12 Popular Post Report Posted June 12 Aviation experts antha ee thread lone unaru ga. 4 Quote
Sam480 Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 5 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said: Thrust loss is undeniably due to "engine failure". The chance of both engines failing at the same time on a Boeing 787—specifically due to simultaneous mechanical or technical failure—is extraordinarily rare, estimated at: Less than 1 in a billion flight hours (10⁻⁹ or lower probability). But let’s unpack this: ✅ What Do We Mean by “At the Same Time”? To fail simultaneously, both engines would need to: Lose thrust within seconds of each other Due to the same cause or independent but coinciding failures 🎯 Main Causes of True Simultaneous Dual Engine Failure These are extremely rare but possible in specific scenarios: Fuel exhaustion or mismanagement (e.g., crew error or undetected fuel leak) Fuel contamination (e.g., icing or water in the fuel system) Volcanic ash or heavy bird strike damaging both engines Software/control system malfunction (extremely rare, but under study in modern aircraft systems) Severe weather/hail ingestion ⚠️ Not Mechanical Simultaneity Most dual engine failures in history were not simultaneous mechanical failures, but a chain of events involving: Loss of one engine And soon after, the second due to a shared problem (fuel, weather, environment) 📊 Statistical Insight According to FAA and industry safety data: Engine in-flight shutdown rate: ~1 per million hours (10⁻⁶) Simultaneous shutdown due to unrelated causes: ~10⁻¹² or lower Accidents involving total power loss: < 0.1 per million flights ✈️ 787 Engine Design and Safety The Boeing 787 uses engines like: Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 GE GEnx These engines: Are independently monitored Have separate fuel and electrical systems Undergo independent maintenance checks Operate under redundant control systems ✅ Bottom Line Question Answer Simultaneous engine failure (mechanical) < 1 in 1 billion flight hours (very rare) Most likely causes Fuel-related, environmental, or external 787’s design & ETOPS-330 rating Allows up to 5.5 hours diversion on 1 engine safely Quote
CanadianMalodu Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 9 minutes ago, Sam480 said: The chance of both engines failing at the same time on a Boeing 787—specifically due to simultaneous mechanical or technical failure—is extraordinarily rare, estimated at: Less than 1 in a billion flight hours (10⁻⁹ or lower probability). But let’s unpack this: ✅ What Do We Mean by “At the Same Time”? To fail simultaneously, both engines would need to: Lose thrust within seconds of each other Due to the same cause or independent but coinciding failures 🎯 Main Causes of True Simultaneous Dual Engine Failure These are extremely rare but possible in specific scenarios: Fuel exhaustion or mismanagement (e.g., crew error or undetected fuel leak) Fuel contamination (e.g., icing or water in the fuel system) Volcanic ash or heavy bird strike damaging both engines Software/control system malfunction (extremely rare, but under study in modern aircraft systems) Severe weather/hail ingestion ⚠️ Not Mechanical Simultaneity Most dual engine failures in history were not simultaneous mechanical failures, but a chain of events involving: Loss of one engine And soon after, the second due to a shared problem (fuel, weather, environment) 📊 Statistical Insight According to FAA and industry safety data: Engine in-flight shutdown rate: ~1 per million hours (10⁻⁶) Simultaneous shutdown due to unrelated causes: ~10⁻¹² or lower Accidents involving total power loss: < 0.1 per million flights ✈️ 787 Engine Design and Safety The Boeing 787 uses engines like: Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 GE GEnx These engines: Are independently monitored Have separate fuel and electrical systems Undergo independent maintenance checks Operate under redundant control systems ✅ Bottom Line Question Answer Simultaneous engine failure (mechanical) < 1 in 1 billion flight hours (very rare) Most likely causes Fuel-related, environmental, or external 787’s design & ETOPS-330 rating Allows up to 5.5 hours diversion on 1 engine safely Which is why I suspect act of Sabotage. Too many things going wrong at the same time. Quote
Sam480 Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 4 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said: Which is why I suspect act of Sabotage. Too many things going wrong at the same time. Quote
Android_Halwa Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 41 minutes ago, futureofandhra said: Remember those boat accidents and stampedes Stampede….edi pushkarallo jarigina stampede ae na ? Quote
EyBisa Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 25 minutes ago, Bendapudi_english said: Aviation experts antha ee thread lone unaru ga. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.