Rbi office moved from Vizag to Vijayawada antaga

[Anta Assamey]

25 minutes ago, psycopk said:

iddaru seniors.. maintain peace man..  @Keth dont provoke 

[Keth]

2023 lo vachina konebhar kicking asss of 2010 musali bob star  @ARYA

subham card esesam inka cinema aipoyindi relax

[Jatka Bandi]

3 minutes ago, Anta Assamey said:

baa, andariki konni porn links pampu baa.. evariki vaallu salla padataru.. 

[Jatka Bandi]

2 minutes ago, Keth said:

2023 lo vachina konebhar kicking asss of 2010 musali bob star  @ARYA

subham card esesam inka cinema aipoyindi relax

em nadichindi ikkada inthaki? 

[Anta Assamey]

6 hours ago, Jatka Bandi said:

baa, andariki konni porn links pampu baa.. evariki vaallu salla padataru.. 

Evaro anukoni na venta padutunaavu ani chala sarlu cheppanu...Added to Ignore list...

[Jatka Bandi]

5 minutes ago, Anta Assamey said:

Added to Ignore list...

janalani santha parachadaniki idea iste, enti baa idi.. ante andaru kottukuni chavali antava? 

[11MohanRedddy]

8 hours ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Huh? Mari gajuwaka lo evaru gelicharu?

Gajuwaka is like Rangareddy of Hyderabad. 4 seats of Vizag why did TDP win? Infact Jagan never said Vizag will be the capital before 2019 elections.

[11MohanRedddy]

6 hours ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Where did Supreme court say 2024 elections? The decision of Capital City is upon the incumbent government. So, if government changes then Capital can change. There is no fixed statute for capital.

What does that mean? YCP wins capital is Vizag, Kootami wins capital is Amaravati. 

[CanadianMalodu]

5 minutes ago, 11MohanRedddy said:

What does that mean? YCP wins capital is Vizag, Kootami wins capital is Amaravati. 

Yes, whoever is in power in the state government can make that decision. There is no law that bars or advocates incumbent's action in this regard, neither is this decision in center's purview. 

Only possibility that can stop Jagan from acting on it, has to come from BJP especially now that the Z10n1$t WB is involved they can pull strings with BJP to ensure Amaravathi is retained as the Capital of Andhra. 

[11MohanRedddy]

1 minute ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Yes, whoever is in power in the state government can make that decision. There is no law that bars or advocates incumbent's action in this regard, neither is this decision in center's purview. 

Only possibility that can stop Jagan from acting on it, has to come from BJP especially now that the Z10n1$t WB is involved they can pull strings with BJP to ensure Amaravathi is retained as the Capital of Andhra. 

No, in India, the power to decide the capital of a newly formed state rests with the Parliament, not the state itself. 

However, the situation surrounding existing states and their capitals can be more complex and has been subject to legal and political debate. 

Key Points:

Parliamentary Authority for New States: When a new state is formed, the Parliament, through an Act of Parliament (under Articles 3 and 4 of the Constitution), establishes the capital. State Reorganization Acts, for instance, don't typically specify the permanent capital, allowing the elected state government to decide subsequently.

Andhra Pradesh Case: The recent controversy surrounding Andhra Pradesh's decision to establish three capitals (Visakhapatnam, Amaravati, and Kurnool) highlights the legal ambiguity. The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that the state legislature lacked the authority to alter the capital as it was decided by the Parliament through the AP Reorganisation Act. This decision is in contrast to the historical practice where states have often made such decisions.

Ongoing Debate and Proposed Amendment: The question of who decides the capital of a state is currently before the Supreme Court. There's also a proposed amendment to the Constitution (Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2022) which seeks to explicitly give the state legislature the power to establish or change its capital(s).

Practical Implications: If states had complete autonomy in deciding or changing their capitals, it could potentially lead to political instability and misuse of power. 

In summary, while there have been historical precedents of states changing their capitals and a proposed amendment to clarify the power, the legal position, especially in the context of reorganised states, suggests that the Parliament has the primary authority to determine the capital of a newly formed state in India. The extent of the state government's power to change or establish multiple capitals remains a matter of ongoing debate and legal scrutiny. 

[CanadianMalodu]

7 minutes ago, 11MohanRedddy said:

Gajuwaka is like Rangareddy of Hyderabad. 4 seats of Vizag why did TDP win? Infact Jagan never said Vizag will be the capital before 2019 elections.

Gajuwaka holds about 5lakh population. That's about 1/4-1/5 of Vizag's population. I'm only correcting your incorrect statement that Jagan won 0 seats in Vishakapatnam. Nagireddi defeated Paleru in 2019. 

Jagan had to make a call after seeing the debt trap that Baboru was pushing Andhra into without any visibility. Vizag is a readymade city just like Hyderabad, needs much lower investment and such a move doesn't damage superior Corp yeilding agricultural lands.

[vetrivel]

1 hour ago, Keth said:

I never involved with him, not even once, eppati nundo chustunam eeda fake ids gampa pettukuni tirugutha untadu, halwa gaadu ayina oka id lone edustadu 

 

final ga inni years ki vaade BOB star ani announce chesukuni dorikipoyadu parama poramboku edava

sontha place meeda edche ilanti neethi jaathi leni kukkalatho time waste. 

edho peekestuna ankuni vaadni vaade expose cheskuni poyadu item gaadu.

I told vetri better than halwa, now can i say halwa much much better than our BOB star arya

I agree brother Halwa much much much better than Aavesham star abusive ids using @Konebhar6

[11MohanRedddy]

2 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Gajuwaka holds about 5lakh population. That's about 1/4-1/5 of Vizag's population. I'm only correcting your incorrect statement that Jagan won 0 seats in Vishakapatnam. Nagireddi defeated Paleru in 2019. 

Jagan had to make a call after seeing the debt trap that Baboru was pushing Andhra into without any visibility. Vizag is a readymade city just like Hyderabad, needs much lower investment and such a move doesn't damage superior Corp yeilding agricultural lands.

Show me 1 proof of Jagan indicating that the capital will be moved from Amaravati before winning in 2019. 

[vetrivel]

42 minutes ago, Keth said:

2023 lo vachina konebhar kicking asss of 2010 musali bob star  @ARYA

subham card esesam inka cinema aipoyindi relax

As usual aavesham star will continue abusing and play victim whenever confronted

 

 

[CanadianMalodu]

3 minutes ago, 11MohanRedddy said:

No, in India, the power to decide the capital of a newly formed state rests with the Parliament, not the state itself. 

However, the situation surrounding existing states and their capitals can be more complex and has been subject to legal and political debate. 

Key Points:

Parliamentary Authority for New States: When a new state is formed, the Parliament, through an Act of Parliament (under Articles 3 and 4 of the Constitution), establishes the capital. State Reorganization Acts, for instance, don't typically specify the permanent capital, allowing the elected state government to decide subsequently.

Andhra Pradesh Case: The recent controversy surrounding Andhra Pradesh's decision to establish three capitals (Visakhapatnam, Amaravati, and Kurnool) highlights the legal ambiguity. The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that the state legislature lacked the authority to alter the capital as it was decided by the Parliament through the AP Reorganisation Act. This decision is in contrast to the historical practice where states have often made such decisions.

Ongoing Debate and Proposed Amendment: The question of who decides the capital of a state is currently before the Supreme Court. There's also a proposed amendment to the Constitution (Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2022) which seeks to explicitly give the state legislature the power to establish or change its capital(s).

Practical Implications: If states had complete autonomy in deciding or changing their capitals, it could potentially lead to political instability and misuse of power. 

In summary, while there have been historical precedents of states changing their capitals and a proposed amendment to clarify the power, the legal position, especially in the context of reorganised states, suggests that the Parliament has the primary authority to determine the capital of a newly formed state in India. The extent of the state government's power to change or establish multiple capitals remains a matter of ongoing debate and legal scrutiny. 

Ongoing debate. That's all. AP reorganization act DOES NOT have any PROPOSED CAPITAL. Baboru's idea is to make an Amendment to it using BJP.

I think BJP is not going to do it till YCP looses their Rajya Sabha seats. How Jagan takes it overall needs to be seen. BJP can't keep Jagan away for long time which only backfires at them as politically defunct Jagan means politically resurgent Congress, which is good for Baboru but bad for BJP.