Did Jai Shankar laser lights hit Trump?

[yslokesh]

19 minutes ago, pakeer_saab said:

breeding Khalistani sepratism on behalf of another major power cannot be tolerated

second, nee IQ beyond topics pick chesukoku, read about kanishka b***ing and indira killing, India cannot be soft of anti-india forces, they could not get Canada to fix themselves, hnce the diplomatic failure

Jaishankar is a 50 yrs expert on diplomacy and foreign relations. 90% of real information never gets out. India was so pissed off with Canada for good reason

 

Jaishankar is a disatser raa baaabu... relations with almost anni countries gone for a toss...can't you see it???

I do not know why you cant see it.

Asalu Khalistani ane word 1984 tharuvaatha ippude vintunnaaamu...can you tell me once thing they did after Indira's killing??? 

Borders with Pakistan are totally sealed by 2001 across North-West India. Thats why terr0rists choose Mumbai in 2008.

But then why after 2014, attacks are happening in Punjab and Kashmir???

Its definitely insider job of BJP to use Pakistan as bait to garner votes...

Thats the sad reality.

[pakeer_saab]

1 minute ago, yslokesh said:

You are talking these when India has become worlds fourth largest economy even though per capita GDP is not even worlds Top 100. collecitive power of nation is more important then individual, with 2.5 we are at 4th, just imapgine what will it is at 5K $, Congress jokers are pessimistic and BJP is optimistic, 99 will be the max seats for congress for long long time

India was left poorest nation in 1947. Nothing was in favour of India. India was in fragile 5 even in 2014. lack of economy was due to adopting socialism and aligning with imaginary non alignment movement that no once cared

What good does UNSC perm seat can do to India? Nothing. Russia, UK and France did not gain anything being on UNSC. Can you tell me one advantage of being UNSC member? only a congress low IQ can ask such quesiton about what would we get with UNSC seat, mere reason that we dont have it in 2025  and still trying to get it explains the importance, it would give us a veto to expand our diplomatic reach to the world, France without a vote is just an european country like germany.

USA has been the defacto leader of the world since 1945.

What problems did Article 370 create? Its just BJPs propaganda. Under any case India was compelled to spend billions on Kashmir security. any sane human with a pinch of brain knows it was stupid idea to not integrate kashmir fully into India and going to UN was the biggest mistakes, we spend billions due to unresolved issue by Nehru

Nehru thought investment on Army was not priority because 90% of Indians were struggling to put food on their plates. this line explains why BJP and Modern India hates Nehru

neekoka simply IQ test, check all the years of BJP rule vs Congress rule since 1991 and you will know an answer yourself if you have atleast 80 IQ

 

[yslokesh]

8 minutes ago, pakeer_saab said:

 

LOL...you are a true joker...

Germany without Veto is much much much powerful than France with Veto..

inka nee sodhi chadhavatam waste..

UK, France & Russia lost more than they gained being on Veto list.

China became powerful not being in Veto list but just by hardwork.

Japan, South Korea, Germany, Singapore, Australia, Canada, NZ, Italy, Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Sweden consitently get listed on WORLDS TOP 10 any indicator not by being on UNSC Veto list..

sollu appu..

 

[yslokesh]

12 minutes ago, pakeer_saab said:

 

I checked all years...and most terr0sits attacks happened in BJP time are all STAGED.

[pakeer_saab]

33 minutes ago, yslokesh said:

I checked all years...and most terr0sits attacks happened in BJP time are all STAGED.

all those happened under MMS were REAL?? 

 

 

[Democraticcompulsion]

3 hours ago, yslokesh said:

blaming Nehru for giving away Indian land to China and retracting from PoK without seizing it completely.

Congress galla ki blame Ledu anukunte maname morkhulam avutam. Kashmir penta motham valla chalave. 

[yslokesh]

14 minutes ago, Democraticcompulsion said:

Congress galla ki blame Ledu anukunte maname morkhulam avutam. Kashmir penta motham valla chalave. 

haaa...its a;; history buddy..

In the first place, there was never a country called India as we see it today before 1757.

The British united hundreds and thousands of Princely states (Saamantha raajulu) into one single entity.

India on 1947 inherited all the evils of being a colony for a European imperial power for nearly 200 years.

What else do you expect?

On the contrary, Modi in 2014 was handed over a well-matured democracy, a nuclear powered nation, an economy about to be a developed economy. a non-aligned position, friendly with both Israel & Saudi & Iran & Iraq, friend with both Russia & USA, friend with North Korea & South Korea...

Modi/RSS/BJP should not blame previous regimes for their failures.

[Democraticcompulsion]

1 minute ago, yslokesh said:

haaa...its a;; history buddy..

In the first place, there was never a country called India as we see it today before 1757.

The British united hundreds and thousands of Princely states (Saamantha raajulu) into one single entity.

India on 1947 inherited all the evils of being a colony for a European imperial power for nearly 200 years.

What else do you expect?

On the contrary, Modi in 2014 was handed over a well-matured democracy, a nuclear powered nation, an economy about to be a developed economy. a non-aligned position, friendly with both Israel & Saudi & Iran & Iraq, friend with both Russia & USA, friend with North Korea & South Korea...

Modi/RSS/BJP should not blame previous regimes for their failures.

You are ignoring the success of lal bahadur in handling conflicts across India. He was not allowed to handle Kashmir. 

 

[Teluguredu]

25 minutes ago, Democraticcompulsion said:

Congress galla ki blame Ledu anukunte maname morkhulam avutam. Kashmir penta motham valla chalave. 

Kashmiris in pok are Pakistani punjabis,if imdia were to occupy it the complications would be much higher ,kashmiris in kashmir are ethnic kashmiris atleast who aren't related to pakistan.

Nehru probably didnt want to engage in a full on extended war plus even if he annexed it , what would he do with the huge population who are against India.

[Democraticcompulsion]

3 minutes ago, Teluguredu said:

punjabis,if imdia were to occupy it the complications would be much higher

If India were to occupy enti? India did occupy and then ceded it away.

 

[bhaigan]

Jai Shankar laser light gitla untadi

 

 Deeniki Sanghi's cry forever on Nehru

Desam paruvu ekkada padithe akkada teesina LK

Sanghi Bigot's !

[VanceChilukuri]

as part of US-China trade deal, Xi requested trump to put more tariffs on India so that Modi would run towards China....and since US has more dependency on China than India, a good trade deal with China is more important for US than India, so, Trump agreed and started treating India like a nothing country.....

both US and China are benefitting a lot with tariffs on India.

[VanceChilukuri]

we have been played, Modi and Jaishankar lost it.

[bhaigan]

22 minutes ago, Democraticcompulsion said:

You are ignoring the success of lal bahadur in handling conflicts across India. He was not allowed to handle Kashmir. 

 

Monna Patel ippudu Lal bahadur Sastri aa, who also opposed RSS

[Teluguredu]

16 minutes ago, Democraticcompulsion said:

If India were to occupy enti? India did occupy and then ceded it away.

 

No they didn't occupy it ,the troops have advanced beyond loc but they didn't bring territory under control,they didn't concede any territory,just the troops were called back that's all.