35 minutes ago, Spartan said:

Actually South States should support this... 50% rule instead of 2011 census..

repoddune vere evarochina...census prakaram ga cheyandi ante....chala takkuva avutai seats...

10 minutes ago, mazar said:

mari rahul anna slogan ---> "jiski jithni aabadhi usko uthna haq" gurinchi meeru ippudu em antaru?

my state interests are my primary concern.. Rahul ledu bokka ledu..

Just now, futureofandhra said:

special status kosam

Apattike Baboru accepted "Spl. Package". He took got "Polavaram" handed over his favorite contractors after getting it removed as "national project". What will Jagan do here ?

Just now, CADNMALODU said:

Apattike Baboru accepted "Spl. Package". He took got "Polavaram" handed over his favorite contractors after getting it removed as "national project". What will Jagan do here ?

2019 election lo em telidha ee vishayam ayina sarey adigaru ga

prathi bill ki supported

2 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

2019 election lo em telidha ee vishayam ayina sarey adigaru ga

prathi bill ki supported

Bills Andhra interest ki against ga ekkada unnayi? Spl. Status 2014 Baboru tho samaptham.

54 minutes ago, allbakara said:

Agreed, no issue with 50% rule, 2011 census ante ne peddha bokka

2 hours ago, halwafan said:

if done by 50%, its actually not a problem..

how much diff will 50% make?? just 20-25 seats wont change anything

its just a political stick to fool certain ppl

15 minutes ago, halwafan said:

my state interests are my primary concern.. Rahul ledu bokka ledu..

50% rule tho ho wmuch diff will it make to your state??

TG with delimitation 24

TG with 50% rule 25

1 seat diff ki underwears tearing......comedy ra babu it is so easy for politician to rile low iq public

6 minutes ago, kaiku said:

MAVIGUN SUBBA LINGAM SHULIGAN crying

11 minutes ago, mazar said:

50% rule tho ho wmuch diff will it make to your state??

TG with delimitation 24

TG with 50% rule 25

1 seat diff ki underwears tearing......comedy ra babu it is so easy for politician to rile low iq public

Even without no difference. Telugu states lo center tho pettukunna leader evadu ledhu. NTR ani Tammulu antaru kani, antha cinema ledhu. Edho oka national party ni moyyalsindhe. Deni valla peddha nastam emi ledhu.

1 hour ago, halwafan said:

ekkada oppose chesaru? parliament lona?

‘Special status’ - The Hindu

7 hours ago, CADNMALODU said:

Even without no difference. Telugu states lo center tho pettukunna leader evadu ledhu. NTR ani Tammulu antaru kani, antha cinema ledhu. Edho oka national party ni moyyalsindhe. Deni valla peddha nastam emi ledhu.

The outrage is that South states will not have bargaining power despite contributing to the GDP.

whatever the calculations are at the end of the representation from BIMARU states is more than majority so BJP has more chances. Whoever wins majority of seats in BIMARU states will control the center they don’t have to care about South states.

Already South states doesn’t get much treatment in allocation of funds anyway railway budget historically speaking as example.

as of now center didn’t mention any process how delimitation would be calculated but percentage of representation shrinks,

Its not that as of today south has good representation but it would further dilute our say in parliament is what many are concerned about.

6 minutes ago, HarshitaG said:

The outrage is that South states will not have bargaining power despite contributing to the GDP.

whatever the calculations are at the end of the representation from BIMARU states is more than majority so BJP has more chances. Whoever wins majority of seats in BIMARU states will control the center they don’t have to care about South states.

Already South states doesn’t get much treatment in allocation of funds anyway railway budget historically speaking as example.

as of now center didn’t mention any process how delimitation would be calculated but percentage of representation shrinks,

Its not that as of today south has good representation but it would further dilute our say in parliament is what many are concerned about.

There is no such bargaining power atleast to the Telugu states from the beginning. All Telugu politicians have been palanquin bearers of the central parties with states being fiefdoms for certain families. It's not different in TamilNadu or even Karnataka.

Moving forward is further consolidation of two party system and regional fiefs reduced to mere tail wagers, if they're already not. To be honest Southern states infrastructure is built on the backs of cheap labour from Northern and Central states, and also on the backs of their energy reserves. Their beaurocrats are special breed of leeches though, that's another story.

12 hours ago, allbakara said:

Why no news or disco in db?

Baboru khandisthada ledha hands up ye na ee sari democratic compulsion valla

Jaggad as usual blind ga yes ani guddhude ye as usual adhi ye bill aina

Emundi andulo just a gimmick to accomodate female reservation. Doubling each state mps not going to threaten anyone.

18 minutes ago, CADNMALODU said:

There is no such bargaining power atleast to the Telugu states from the beginning. All Telugu politicians have been palanquin bearers of the central parties with states being fiefdoms for certain families. It's not different in TamilNadu or even Karnataka.

Moving forward is further consolidation of two party system and regional fiefs reduced to mere tail wagers, if they're already not. To be honest Southern states infrastructure is built on the backs of cheap labour from Northern and Central states, and also on the backs of their energy reserves. Their beaurocrats are special breed of leeches though, that's another story.

cheap labor from north was non existent before only when south became more educated and migration happened from south to gulf/west that’s when cheap labor started flowing in.

Mineral wealth — I am not finding the word to it, yes I do agree that South benefitted from mineral wealth of north but help me find the word to it;

Just now, HarshitaG said:

cheap labor from north was non existent before only when south became more educated and migration happened from south to gulf/west that’s when cheap labor started flowing in.

Mineral wealth — I am not finding the word to it, yes I do agree that South benefitted from mineral wealth of north but help me find the word to it;

Got it freight equalization policy

24 minutes ago, HarshitaG said:

cheap labor from north was non existent before only when south became more educated and migration happened from south to gulf/west that’s when cheap labor started flowing in.

Mineral wealth — I am not finding the word to it, yes I do agree that South benefitted from mineral wealth of north but help me find the word to it;

isn't that start of rapid urban sprawl and infra building ? That's when labour from the North filled the gap.