sqlguy Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 Aapara nee fox tears Edo pedda manchi tanam natinchaku Nee landasura posts aapi panduko inka
loveindia Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 Aapara nee fox tears Edo pedda manchi tanam natinchaku Nee landasura posts aapi panduko inka nuvvu aa ps02 gaadivi entra... ninnu ye cheppu tho kottali ra asalu...
irukupaalem Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 140 EAD valla biscuit analedu nenu ekkada... 140 ke EAD ani adigitey mana vallu, future students ki kastam chestaaru ee employers annanu... naaku 140 aipoindi kada ani naa tarvata vachey vaadini tokkeylenu kada man... ippudu emanna sammaga chestunnara employer..eppudaina manchi empgadu aite munde terms cheppi correctgane chestadu?
sqlguy Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 nuvvu aa ps02 gaadivi entra... ninnu ye cheppu tho kottali ra asalu... Ps02 evaru ra babu Nenu Ee db ki kotha Naku chance vaste ade cheppu ki piyya poosi ninne kodtha
loveindia Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 ippudu emanna sammaga chestunnara employer..eppudaina manchi empgadu aite munde terms cheppi correctgane chestadu? daani choose cheskovalsindi evadu man???
Osama Bin Gandhi Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 People don't listen to the smartest person in the room, they listen to whoever acts as if they know what's right, according to a study. nuvvu aa ps02 gaadivi entra... ninnu ye cheppu tho kottali ra asalu...
teluguwatch Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 For I-140 EAD and Portability: Reality of conflict of interest between the I-140 sponsoring employer and I-140 foreign worker mobility turns out to be a key issue which is likely to get a lot of attention for the policy makers on this reform. They brought up the issue of fairness to the employers who invested a lot of money and efforts for the immigration sponsorship. It will be interesting to see where the policy makers will draw a line that meets the interest of the employers and interest of the employee fairly.
loveindia Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 People don't listen to the smartest person in the room, they listen to whoever acts as if they know what's right, according to a study. Sheldon man, nice quote...
annu11abcdef Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 Summary of USCIS “listening session” – March 19, 2015 The USCIS held a Business-Focused Immigration Enhancements Listening Ses- sion today to discuss the administration’s upcoming executive actions. The high- lights of the session included: Kevin Cummings (Chief of the Business and Foreign Workers Division of USCIS) began the presentation. He said that the USCIS is working on drafting regula- tions on the following subjects: Parole in place for talented entrepreneurs Clarification of NIW requirements Amend regs to allow benefits to some workers with approved I-140s EADs for workers with I-140s approved for an unspecified period of time Clarify AC21 job portability standards Resolve L1B standards He then asked questions for public comment. The overall tenor of the USCIS questions seemed to indicate a restrictive mind- set. They asked about wanting to hear the concerns that employers have about employee job portability. They also asked whether the USCIS should publish a form and require a filing fee to pre-adjudicate job transfers under AC21 before a transfer could take place. It sounded as though they are getting pushback from employer groups concern- ing employee portability. While nothing specific was said, the overall tone sounded as if they are looking at making portability more restrictive. Nothing was said about “pre-registration” of adjustment of status applicants. Ra- ther, they are thinking about granting EAD cards to people with approved peti- tions after a specified interval (such as six months). There were a lot of comments and questions, but nothing of substance came from the “listening” portion. One interesting comment came when someone asked about filing AOS without a current priority date, they said "We can't com- ment on that but we are considering a number of such issues and discussing them with the Department of State." They said that they have been working on regulations since the President’s an- nouncement (November 20, 2014). They reiterated that it takes a long time to promulgate regulations and that nothing will happen immediately. Still, if they will work diligently on the regulations, they can publish final rules this year (2015). We will be discussing this on our immigration discussion forum at http://www.im- migration-information.com/forums/
MayaBazar Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 inthaki final ga emi telcharu oka mukkalo cheppandi
Suhaas Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 how are you Seven man... Good bhayya. U? Endi busy untunnava? Sqlsaga down undi. Updates lev. Classes kuda bandh chesinav.
Silver_mani Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 Summary of USCIS “listening session” – March 19, 2015 The USCIS held a Business-Focused Immigration Enhancements Listening Ses- sion today to discuss the administration’s upcoming executive actions. The high- lights of the session included: Kevin Cummings (Chief of the Business and Foreign Workers Division of USCIS) began the presentation. He said that the USCIS is working on drafting regula- tions on the following subjects: Parole in place for talented entrepreneurs Clarification of NIW requirements Amend regs to allow benefits to some workers with approved I-140s EADs for workers with I-140s approved for an unspecified period of time Clarify AC21 job portability standards Resolve L1B standards He then asked questions for public comment. The overall tenor of the USCIS questions seemed to indicate a restrictive mind- set. They asked about wanting to hear the concerns that employers have about employee job portability. They also asked whether the USCIS should publish a form and require a filing fee to pre-adjudicate job transfers under AC21 before a transfer could take place. It sounded as though they are getting pushback from employer groups concern- ing employee portability. While nothing specific was said, the overall tone sounded as if they are looking at making portability more restrictive. Nothing was said about “pre-registration” of adjustment of status applicants. Ra- ther, they are thinking about granting EAD cards to people with approved peti- tions after a specified interval (such as six months). There were a lot of comments and questions, but nothing of substance came from the “listening” portion. One interesting comment came when someone asked about filing AOS without a current priority date, they said "We can't com- ment on that but we are considering a number of such issues and discussing them with the Department of State." They said that they have been working on regulations since the President’s an- nouncement (November 20, 2014). They reiterated that it takes a long time to promulgate regulations and that nothing will happen immediately. Still, if they will work diligently on the regulations, they can publish final rules this year (2015). We will be discussing this on our immigration discussion forum at http://www.im- migration-information.com/forums/ Good Post
massmaharaj Posted March 19, 2015 Report Posted March 19, 2015 yes change is needed... nenu cheppindi drastic change is not needed ani... we went from std booths to cellular phones and then whatsapp... so nenu cheppedi.... 140's ki EAD ivvu... H4's ki kaadu... or evado okariki... iddariki kaadu... do you agree or disagree?? Deentlo consultancy prema or donga prema emanna kanipinchindaa... sollugallaki cheppu.... i140 ki ead isthe pellanki ichinaate kadha iam confused here but , i140 unte h4 ead ki ivvatam aapesi only 6 years vaadiki isthe that will recover
.thumb.gif.343fe49c7e1c507ae0056326bd8cf77e.gif)
Recommended Posts