What's the point of life?

[uttermost]

13 minutes ago, ceelogreen said:

dolling idk if u really mean it .... if u do then i am ur fyaan...

 

 

anyway i dont think u believe in new year wishes so i am not wishing u anything... you 

ofcourse I let others live. I just don't let people walk over others (as much as I can within my capacity).

short ga cheppalantey, in a discussion on BSD/MIT vs GPL license, I would mostly side with BSD/MIT, except in rare instances where I would support GPL.

HNY to you too.

[ceelogreen]

3 minutes ago, uttermost said:

ofcourse I let others live. I just don't let people walk over others (as much as I can within my capacity).

short ga cheppalantey, in a discussion on BSD/MIT vs GPL license, I would mostly side with BSD/MIT, except in rare instances where I would support GPL.

HNY to you too.

ba u touched my bolls..... HNY to u too

[aakathaai]

On 7/22/2017 at 7:22 AM, tennisluvr said:

Wanna see the answers. Start flowing the flow. 

sinthakaai

[Don_Draper]

7 hours ago, uttermost said:

did you get the point of this book? if yes, pls tell me.

personally, I'm offended that tennislvr thought i'd like this book about a textbook nihilist who has basically given up on the world.

His basic premise that 'Truth is relative to the person engaging in it, and one shouldn't impose on others' is not novel, nor is it complete. because people use this sort of moral relativism to impose on others all the time. eg. Nationalism, regionalism, linguist chauvnism, male chauvinism., and people fighting these impositions are the ones that get lectured on moral relativism.

It is perhaps the most depressing book I've read. good thing its short, and written in very simple sentences. I think the writer wanted to write a kafkasque tragedy, but wasn't quite good enough to do it.

In the end, its neither philosophical (existential) , nor an interesting take on reality, nor a compelling allegory to modern life itself.

i concur with @tennisluvr, if he thought you probably would like the book , as in most of your db marathons, if not all, you resemble the shades of  Meursault (now don't get too offended) if not raymond (both are same just on different sides) . Was it depressing ? yes, but do you think life isn't depressing at all ? incomplete? yes.  If you were thinking it would bring a closure , it did in the right way, considering the first line of the book. According to the author, the story does relate to the life in 1942. Is it ageless? Probably, as philosophies are not time bound.  

[Don_Draper]

7 hours ago, uttermost said:

actually its just to live. just live and let others live. 

although, i do that. People won't reciprocate. 

I think its genetical

[Quickgun_murugan]

On July 21, 2017 at 8:48 PM, TOM_BHAYYA said:

@kiladi bullodu : sc and Chex 

@k2s : gc but armr 

@raithu_bidda : to witness raajanna rajyam again

 

 

On July 21, 2017 at 8:06 PM, mastercheif said:

entity

peasized 

intellect

rectum