desha bhakti ekkuvaithey, meeku meerey sollu chepkondi ra..

[uttermost]

9 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

What's your version? Army stopped from voting?

army is useless is my version, and is only fit to harrass local people.

 which seems to give you the thrills.

[uttermost]

8 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

Chalu le ika mingey. Go to Pakistan

avasaram le.. I live in a high income country, and don't support army killing of civilians. my conscience is clear.

[RealKingMaker]

3 minutes ago, uttermost said:

army is useless is my version, and is only fit to harrass local people.

 which seems to give you the thrills.

My question is what is reason for low election turnout? Not how much you hate indian army

[uttermost]

so militancy didn't exist in 2011 where there was 80% voting in panchayat polls.. and it suddenly made an appearance in 2018..

lol @ your argument.

the dumbfcuk modi has quite a keen bunch of equally bombastic supporters.

but results speak for themselves. his kashmir policy is a failure, like all his other policies. he's trying to cover it up by talking about pakistan.

[uttermost]

4 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

My question is what is reason for low election turnout? Not how much you hate indian army

GOI rushed into the election without consulting the local parties. so many of them didn't file nominations. NC PDP didn't participate.

95% of voters boycotted the elections, and now there's no leigitmacy to the process.

now you tell me, how come 2011 elections polled 80%.. jsut try..

I'm sure your muslim hate will come out. lol.

[RealKingMaker]

Just now, uttermost said:

GOI rushed into the election without consulting the local parties. so many of them didn't file nominations.

95% of voters boycotted the elections, and now there's no leigitmacy to the process.

now you tell me, how come 2011 elections polled 80%.. jsut try..

I'm sure your muslim hate will come out. lol.

They opted out of voting in democratic terms and instead chose violent fights is the point you want to make?

[uttermost]

4 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

My question is what is reason for low election turnout? Not how much you hate indian army

it still follows that army with its $5b budget behaves like a dabba ka business, without having serious plans about withdrawal from civilian places.

ofcourse any sane person will hate such an army.. unless they hate the people who the army oppresses.

[RealKingMaker]

1 minute ago, uttermost said:

it still follows that army with its $5b budget behaves like a dabba ka business, without having serious plans about withdrawal from civilian places.

ofcourse any sane person will hate such an army.. unless they hate the people who the army oppresses.

Political consensus is needed for army to withdraw. They are there on orders of central govt.

[RealKingMaker]

2 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

They opted out of voting in democratic terms and instead chose violent fights is the point you want to make?

If violence is what they opted instead of democracy, they are getting what they opted, don't you think so?

[uttermost]

Just now, RealKingMaker said:

They opted out of voting in democratic terms and instead chose violent fights is the point you want to make?

its not democracy when GoI unilaterally calls for elections without consulting the local parties. lol. BJP called  the elections without the two main local parties. and people gave the middle finger to BJP by not caring.

that's how a colonial govt behaves.. and people won't vote in a colonial govt. haha.. They agitate.. its the army's response with bullets that escalates the violence. The violence won't come from people. lol.

what are you arguing man..

 

[uttermost]

3 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

Political consensus is needed for army to withdraw. They are there on orders of central govt.

and they are sitting there like its their father in law's house for decades eating and shitting with nothing of worth to show for it.

[uttermost]

2 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

If violence is what they opted instead of democracy, they are getting what they opted, don't you think so?

no.. they had record turnout in 2011 close to 80%. now tell me why they optd for democracy then? and not now?

and what it has to do with BJP's failed kashmir policy that killed 44 jawans.

[RealKingMaker]

1 minute ago, uttermost said:

its not democracy when GoI unilaterally calls for elections without consulting the local parties. lol. BJP called  the elections without the two main local parties. and people gave the middle finger to BJP by not caring.

that's how a colonial govt behaves.. and people won't vote in a colonial govt. haha.. They agitate.. its the army's response with bullets that escalates the violence. The violence won't come from people. lol.

what are you arguing man..

 

If local parties have the support of people, why to worry about time? It's Kashmiris who'll be voting afterall. Why do you need to blame BJP for it. They could have voted for their local party.

[uttermost]

4 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

If violence is what they opted instead of democracy, they are getting what they opted, don't you think so?

you are basically arguing that its the army's rigth to kill people who agitate.. clever ploy though.

I can't be as open about my disgust for the army because repercussions will be serious if my luck is bad.

and you are the one pretending to live your own life.. this is what living your own life means to you? lol.

arguing for presence of army in an area unconnected to you.. 

[uttermost]

Just now, RealKingMaker said:

If local parties have the support of people, why to worry about time? It's Kashmiris who'll be voting afterall. Why do you need to blame BJP for it. They could have voted for their local party.

are you making my argument? its obvious local parties had people's support.. that's why the turnout was 5% when in 2011 it was 80%.. haha..