All Activity

That’s how market wants it. Same concerns as ORCL. They are pouring big $ into Open AI. Too much of CAPEX commitments and debt.

May be you shouldn’t have tagged me and pulled into in first place.

why big drop microsoft

Kashtam, mestrilu lekunda layoff cycles nunchi survive avvatam..I badly wanted to run away from my mestri and look for a FTE. Last year FTE vachaka artham aindi mestri deggara enta comforto, prati roju lay off news vini vucha padtundi maa office lo andariki..

Super over reaction to MSFT and NOW results. But software application stocks are in a bearish grip. Same with WDAY. ERP implementations - Narrative is that PLTR can do these multi year implementations in months. SAAS companies like NOW, TEAM - Narrative is AI will make these obsolete in no time. Of course I do not believe in these narratives. But you will get better prices in these stocks. Either DCA or wait for better prices.

Endukanna...em seppina manakem telvadu antadu....oka vela doctor vachi cheppina kaadu nene correct...do research antadu. Google university mahima. I'll stay out of this ruddudu yaaparam. I have doctor to take care of it...never trust anyone except qualified professionals for health and money matters.

ee point appudu report vacchinappude idhi vesthe DB lo mana thammullu pandi kovvu aavu kovvu annaru ippudemo tooch adulteration ayyindha ledha ani dialogues mari appudu ayyindhi kadha raa endhuku levaledhu norlu

Thanks @Spartan bro, my sell order executed @ 738

Low detection ledhu em ledhu samara support chesukovataniki vesaadu..dhanikanna better testing PcR testing use chesaaru dhantlo em dhorakaledhu..Technically NDDB testing vs SIT testing choodau NDDB had more chances of false positives where as this PCR is DNA analysis In the context of the SIT's January 2026 chargesheet, the statement that lard was "not detected" even with a "limit of detection (LOD) > 10%" means that investigators found no scientific proof of pig fat in the ghee, even at high concentrations. Here is the breakdown of what those technical terms imply in this specific case: "Not Detected": This indicates that forensic and chemical testing of the four ghee samples yielded no traces of animal-derived DNA or lipids associated with lard. "Limit of Detection > 10%": This suggests that the testing method used was highly sensitive, capable of identifying even small amounts of foreign fat. If lard had been present at any concentration above 10% (or even much lower, depending on the specific equipment), it would have triggered a "positive" result. The fact that nothing was found confirms that the original "animal fat" theory has been scientifically debunked. Why was there an earlier "Positive" report? The SIT report clarifies that the original lab deviations (S-values) seen in late 2024 were caused by a "chemical cocktail" of palm oil, vegetable fats, and artificial esters designed to mimic the properties of ghee, which fooled the initial screening tests. The conclusion of the SIT is that while the ghee was massively adulterated (synthetic and fake), it was not contaminated with animal fats like lard or beef tallow. Would you like to know more about the specific synthetic chemicals found in the "fake ghee" instead of lard? Technically, the PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) method used in the CBI-led SIT investigation is superior for confirming the biological origin of fat (like lard), while the NDDB's CALF method is a broader screening tool for general purity. The two methods differ in purpose and reliability: 1. NDDB CALF Method (Gas Chromatography) Technique: Uses Gas Chromatography (ISO 17678) to measure "S-values" (triglyceride profiles). Strengths: Excellent at detecting whether ghee is "impure" by spotting deviations from standard cow milk fat. Weaknesses: It can produce false positives. The NDDB report itself cautioned that things like cow feed (high in vegetable oil) or specific processing methods can cause deviations that look like animal fat but aren't. In this case, the SIT found that synthetic additives (beta-carotene and esters) were used specifically to "hack" these traditional tests. 2. SIT's PCR Method (DNA Analysis) Technique: Specifically targets animal-specific DNA (like pig or cattle DNA) in the sample. Strengths: Highly specific and sensitive. It is considered the best method for confirming the presence of pork DNA or lard, as it looks for the genetic signature of the animal rather than just fatty acid levels. Result: This is why the SIT was able to state with scientific certainty that no animal fat was present; the "DNA-based" evidence overrode the "chemical-based" screening of the NDDB. Summary of Comparison Feature NDDB CALF (GC) SIT Investigation (PCR) Primary Goal General purity screening Specific animal species identification Reliability Can have false positives from vegetable oils Highly accurate for biological origin Findings Found "foreign fat" (broadly defined) Confirmed the "foreign fat" was synthetic vegetable oil

Accident kadhu kabatti. Ivanni common public ki cheppe pulihora kaburlu.

timatimalu

Next rep pesident mee CM ee anta ga anna..

Added some MSFT today....

WDAY (-10%) & SAP (-16%) - FASAK. @Konebhar6 & Other experts - any thoughts on Workday. I noticed recently many implementing WDAY, migrating from legacy like SAP & PeopleSoft..

andaru lend chesthe ride evadu chestadu 🤔

tesla

Musk mawa still believes in Cybertruck. How ya

Pak won by 22 runs

leave it bro.. you are taking it too hard. chill.. peddha peddha maatalu vidustunavu.. don't get hurt

Thatha ne money katti eema ki gold card ippinchi mid term ki karrolla votes kosam campaigning seyisthunnadu ani na feeling

Veedini nammithe anthe iga mana desis ye nammuthar ee thellolu veedini dhekkar except some over action guys

aa car sales baaga thakkuva unnayi. Entire 2025 lo they sold approximately 25k Model X and Model S which is why they thought it is not efficient focus on them any more. Tesla ki unna reach ki brand image ki, they better focus on affordable cars and products.