whats the family ancestry of king porus… ?

[dasari4kntr]

2 hours ago, maverick19 said:

ade kada chepadu. they have history of exaggerating facts in their texts. they are praising king porus to make alexander look good. historian who travelled with alexander was also killed which raises suspicion and the reasons in greek texts on why alexander retreated didnot seem like valid. 

so you/he saying...that battle never happend and that king porus never exists...its all greek texts exaggeration...including the below coin..

 

2 hours ago, maverick19 said:

you can argue the same for greek historians right? why should we believe everything they say. alexander was killed by a nobody called porus ante alexander the great avadu kada. that is his conclusion. may be right or wrong. no body knows is the correct answer. 

if there is Verion B...we can argue with Version A...

but there is always Version A in this case...how can we argue.? as far as i know alexander teacher is aristotle...he sends a historian to collect details of the conquest along with alexander troops..thats what we are reading now...

but all i am seeing now is..there is no indian text evidance so greek text is manipulated..

alexander did visit india that for sure..he won against porus? or not...? is porus really exist..? all are debatable... but alexander decedents were...there in india quite some time..and they were called...యవనులు....you can see them in the history of  గౌతమిపుత్ర శాతకర్ణి also (in telugu movie they badly depicted monotonously..)

 

ok..my new question is... harappa was never mentioned in vedas or any religious texts...but it exists.. we saw what was found in excavations ...now...it comes under which lineage or family ancestry or which part of hindu vamsam (surya vamsam or chandra vamsam..)...etc

 

[maverick19]

On 1/19/2024 at 6:54 PM, dasari4kntr said:

so you/he saying...that battle never happend and that king porus never exists...its all greek texts exaggeration...including the below coin..

 

if there is Verion B...we can argue with Version A...

but there is always Version A in this case...how can we argue.? as far as i know alexander teacher is aristotle...he sends a historian to collect details of the conquest along with alexander troops..thats what we are reading now...

but all i am seeing now is..there is no indian text evidance so greek text is manipulated..

alexander did visit india that for sure..he won against porus? or not...? is porus really exist..? all are debatable... but alexander decedents were...there in india quite some time..and they were called...యవనులు....you can see them in the history of  గౌతమిపుత్ర శాతకర్ణి also (in telugu movie they badly depicted monotonously..)

 

ok..my new question is... harappa was never mentioned in vedas or any religious texts...but it exists.. we saw what was found in excavations ...now...it comes under which lineage or family ancestry or which part of hindu vamsam (surya vamsam or chandra vamsam..)...etc

 

I am not saying anything bro merely quoting the guy in video. What i am saying is history is baised towards who wrote it. Cant believe just one side. his argument made sense. He could be wrong or right. 

 

[dasari4kntr]

2 hours ago, maverick19 said:

I am not saying anything bro merely quoting the guy in video. What i am saying is history is baised towards who wrote it. Cant believe just one side. his argument made sense. He could be wrong or right. 

 

i saw this video already...

all she is claiming is...why it is not mentioned in taxila scriptures which is near by...

but alexander first won the taxila king..and later went to porus...

 

Ambhi ascended to throne of Takshasila.^[4] He sent an embassy to Alexander along with presents consisting of 200 Talents of silver, 3,000 fat oxen and 10,000 sheep or more ( both are estimated around 600 talents of silver)a force of 700 horsemen and offered for surrender.^[4] He appears to have been on hostile terms with his neighbour, Porus, who held the territories east of the Hydaspes.^[5][6] It was probably with a view to strengthening himself against this foe that he sent an embassy to Alexander, while the latter was still in Sogdiana, with offers of assistance and support, perhaps in return for money.^[5]

 

Alexander was cautious by the sight of Ambhi's forces on his first descent into India in 327 BC and ordered his own forces to form up.^[7] Ambhi hastened to relieve Alexander of his apprehension and met him with valuable presents, placing himself and all his forces at his disposal.^[7] Alexander not only returned Ambhi his title and the gifts but he also presented him with a wardrobe of "Persian robes, gold and silver ornaments, 30 horses and 1000 talents in gold".^[7][8][9] Alexander was emboldened to divide his forces, and Ambhi assisted Hephaestion and Perdiccas in constructing a bridge over the Indus where it bends at Hund (Fox 1973), supplied their troops with provisions, and received Alexander himself, and his whole army, in his capital city of Taxila, with every demonstration of friendship and the most liberal hospitality.^{[10][11][2][12]}

On the subsequent advance of the Macedonian king, Taxiles accompanied him with a force of 5000 men and took part in the Battle of the Hydaspes.

Later Eudemus took over Taxila briefly, after which Chandragupta Maurya conquered Alexander's satraps in the sub-continent by 317 BC.

[maverick19]

1 minute ago, dasari4kntr said:

i saw this video already...

all she is claiming is...why it is not mentioned in taxila...

but alexander first won the taxila king..and later went to porus...

 

Ambhi ascended to throne of Takshasila.^[4] He sent an embassy to Alexander along with presents consisting of 200 Talents of silver, 3,000 fat oxen and 10,000 sheep or more ( both are estimated around 600 talents of silver)a force of 700 horsemen and offered for surrender.^[4] He appears to have been on hostile terms with his neighbour, Porus, who held the territories east of the Hydaspes.^[5][6] It was probably with a view to strengthening himself against this foe that he sent an embassy to Alexander, while the latter was still in Sogdiana, with offers of assistance and support, perhaps in return for money.^[5]

 

Alexander was cautious by the sight of Ambhi's forces on his first descent into India in 327 BC and ordered his own forces to form up.^[7] Ambhi hastened to relieve Alexander of his apprehension and met him with valuable presents, placing himself and all his forces at his disposal.^[7] Alexander not only returned Ambhi his title and the gifts but he also presented him with a wardrobe of "Persian robes, gold and silver ornaments, 30 horses and 1000 talents in gold".^[7][8][9] Alexander was emboldened to divide his forces, and Ambhi assisted Hephaestion and Perdiccas in constructing a bridge over the Indus where it bends at Hund (Fox 1973), supplied their troops with provisions, and received Alexander himself, and his whole army, in his capital city of Taxila, with every demonstration of friendship and the most liberal hospitality.^{[10][11][2][12]}

On the subsequent advance of the Macedonian king, Taxiles accompanied him with a force of 5000 men and took part in the Battle of the Hydaspes.

Later Eudemus took over Taxila briefly, after which Chandragupta Maurya conquered Alexander's satraps in the sub-continent by 317 BC.

This makes it even more hard to believe greek narrative. King of takshila was assisting alexander in fight against so called porus but doesnot have any mention in text is very very strange. 

[dasari4kntr]

6 minutes ago, maverick19 said:

This makes it even more hard to believe greek narrative. King of takshila was assisting alexander in fight against so called porus but doesnot have any mention in text is very very strange. 

i think...that point is mentioned by this guy... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K._A._Nilakanta_Sastri

 

in his book... https://books.google.com/books?id=YoAwor58utYC