JaiBalayyaaa Posted January 23, 2024 Report Posted January 23, 2024 5 hours ago, Naaperushiva said: telangana mandalikam valla raaka mundhe different than telugu in coastal andhra or other regions of Andhra. Not true, Telugu was pure in Telangana before they came. Nannayya Tikkana and yerrapragada, the three stalwarts were from three regions of AP. 1 Quote
Naaperushiva Posted January 23, 2024 Report Posted January 23, 2024 50 minutes ago, JaiBalayyaaa said: Not true, Telugu was pure in Telangana before they came. Nannayya Tikkana and yerrapragada, the three stalwarts were from three regions of AP. nenu adey antunna baa..Telugu though was pure back then different dialects vundevi.... Nannayya tikkanna and Yerrapradaga vallu great poets vallu grathika telugu baa literature ki use chesedhi which is not same as the telugu that is used by commoners... Assaka Mahajanapadam nunchi tharuvatha maurya empire , sathavahana andhra ikshvaku's vishnukundina's, chalukya's, pallavas,cholas , kalinga and kakatiyas ila different parts of combined andhra pradesh okko kingdom kindha okko baagam gaa vundedhi kadha ..different kingdoms lo different influences vundevi some kings has local language plus the sanskirt as the court language even prakrit was there at one point... During chalukyas where telugu started having it's script which share similar script as kannada as chalukyas were kannada kings... inka down south ...the cholas becoz of kalebras moved up north into renadu regions...ila chaala influences vunnayi kaabatti different dialects mundhu nunche differences vunnayi. Ofcourse nizam kings vacchaka chaala change ayyindhi agreed but nuvvu choosukuntey even andhra telugu lo kooda chaala urdu influences vuntaayi but manaki theliyavu avi urdu ani...for ex: parva ledhu etc etc.. My point is just that even before nizams different regions lo already differences vunnayi ani anthey Quote
shaktimaan Posted January 23, 2024 Report Posted January 23, 2024 6 minutes ago, Naaperushiva said: theliyavu avi urdu ani...for ex: parva ledhu etc etc.. palaavu or pulaavu ani mudduga antaru ga. Original word is plov Quote
summer27 Posted January 23, 2024 Author Report Posted January 23, 2024 9 hours ago, summer27 said: You need to refresh history bro.. 9 hours ago, Naaperushiva said: can you explain in detail baa...we can discuss more 8 hours ago, Naaperushiva said: nenu adey antunna baa..Telugu though was pure back then different dialects vundevi.... Nannayya tikkanna and Yerrapradaga vallu great poets vallu grathika telugu baa literature ki use chesedhi which is not same as the telugu that is used by commoners... Assaka Mahajanapadam nunchi tharuvatha maurya empire , sathavahana andhra ikshvaku's vishnukundina's, chalukya's, pallavas,cholas , kalinga and kakatiyas ila different parts of combined andhra pradesh okko kingdom kindha okko baagam gaa vundedhi kadha ..different kingdoms lo different influences vundevi some kings has local language plus the sanskirt as the court language even prakrit was there at one point... During chalukyas where telugu started having it's script which share similar script as kannada as chalukyas were kannada kings... inka down south ...the cholas becoz of kalebras moved up north into renadu regions...ila chaala influences vunnayi kaabatti different dialects mundhu nunche differences vunnayi. Ofcourse nizam kings vacchaka chaala change ayyindhi agreed but nuvvu choosukuntey even andhra telugu lo kooda chaala urdu influences vuntaayi but manaki theliyavu avi urdu ani...for ex: parva ledhu etc etc.. My point is just that even before nizams different regions lo already differences vunnayi ani anthey Entire deccan area, including the notherth karnataka parts were under the rule of Bahamani sultans and/or Nizams for a very long periods. One thing that these he Bahamanis and Nizams did was to make Urdu as official language and the education medium was also Urdu. Urdu was replaced as official language FROM PERSIAN in nizam in 1884 and remained so until 1950. and Persian was official language since 16th Century until replaced by Urdu. So in summary for almost 2+ centuries a) All the education happened in these two mediums b) in order for someone to get a job, they must know Persian/Urdu. .. That is why you see most prominent people who came from these regiions had an excellent command on urdu, alll the way starting from Kancharla gopanna who worked under golconda nawab until our PV narasimha rao.. This impacted not only just the language but also influenced the telugu culture, customs, rituals and tradtions too.. Quote
Naaperushiva Posted January 23, 2024 Report Posted January 23, 2024 20 minutes ago, summer27 said: Entire deccan area, including the notherth karnataka parts were under the rule of Bahamani sultans and/or Nizams for a very long periods. One thing that these he Bahamanis and Nizams did was to make Urdu as official language and the education medium was also Urdu. Urdu was replaced as official language FROM PERSIAN in nizam in 1884 and remained so until 1950. and Persian was official language since 16th Century until replaced by Urdu. So in summary for almost 2+ centuries a) All the education happened in these two mediums b) in order for someone to get a job, they must know Persian/Urdu. .. That is why you see most prominent people who came from these regiions had an excellent command on urdu, alll the way starting from Kancharla gopanna who worked under golconda nawab until our PV narasimha rao.. This impacted not only just the language but also influenced the telugu culture, customs, rituals and tradtions too.. true and this is known thing but customs and rituals anthaga or traditions change kaaledhu anedhi naa feeling baa most of them are still intact for ex bathukamma this started in 1000 ad during rajaraja chola time still people follow that tradition kadha ala anni traditions back in the days still follow avuthunnaru ananu but majority change kaaledhu emo anukuntunna....ofcourse urdu has been imposed and i am not denying that and also most of the atrocities oppression reached the peak against the locals during the Razakkars kadha..Yes telugu lo urdu influence increased i am not denying that baa... But idhi main reason anna chote kadha argument between both the regions. Even andhra lo kooda chaalane urdu words vaaduka lo vunnayi .. maamulgaane ee dialects lo difference vundhi...for ex lets take an example of vacchadu in andhra vacchindu antaaru kadha in telangana(ofcourse this can depends on districts too for all 3 regions) and rayalseema lo vacchinaadu antaaru dheentlo em urdu influence ledhu but still dialect differences vunnayi anedhi naa point anthey baa.. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.