దక్షిణాదిని వేరే దేశం చేయాలి, పార్లమెంట్లో రభస

[vetrivel]

21 minutes ago, ticket said:

Bro chillara ledu... come back again

Pacha paytms getting paid know ?

[pizzaaddict]

1 hour ago, Raisins_72 said:

They can fight for more funds - who is stopping them ?

 

Fight chestey ichey la unara ? Idhedho special status laga undi , jd lakshmi narayana fight chestam SS vachey daka antu adu .Existing parties like tdp, ysrcp fight cheyaledhu and we will fight antunadu . Kotha party pettadu and  fight chestadu anta. 

I am not saying about separation etc.  Overall central ruling towards south states . 

[tables]

3 hours ago, Raisins_72 said:

They can fight for more funds - who is stopping them ?

KA Elections ayipoyinaka South India is Congress and North is BJp ani statement ichindhi evaru ? 
 

financial budget is a jujubi reason for Congi - they want to raise this South vs North as per the Agenda ! 

no fighting works.

only number of lok sabha seats matters, which southern states don't have.

[Raisins_72]

2 hours ago, pizzaaddict said:

Fight chestey ichey la unara ? Idhedho special status laga undi , jd lakshmi narayana fight chestam SS vachey daka antu adu .Existing parties like tdp, ysrcp fight cheyaledhu and we will fight antunadu . Kotha party pettadu and  fight chestadu anta. 

I am not saying about separation etc.  Overall central ruling towards south states . 

 

42 minutes ago, tables said:

no fighting works.

only number of lok sabha seats matters, which southern states don't have.

Avuna, mari combined AP nunchi 42 seats ichinaamu - em uddharinchaaru, vunna State ni mukkala mukkalaga cut chesinaamu ! And again we speak abt having more MP seats 😃😃😃

[tables]

2 minutes ago, Raisins_72 said:

 

Avuna, mari combined AP nunchi 42 seats ichinaamu - em uddharinchaaru, vunna State ni mukkala mukkalaga cut chesinaamu ! And again we speak abt having more MP seats 😃😃😃

ikkada 42 unte akkada just UP lo 80 unnai.

UP, bihar, MP, rajasthan , wb, maharastra, gujarat -- these 7 together 300 unnai. ika who cares you have 42 or 25.

[Raisins_72]

1 hour ago, tables said:

ikkada 42 unte akkada just UP lo 80 unnai.

UP, bihar, MP, rajasthan , wb, maharastra, gujarat -- these 7 together 300 unnai. ika who cares you have 42 or 25.

2009 lo highest seats ichinaamu anna Congress ki - manaki em chesinaaru, andhari kantey funds manakey ekkuva vachinaaya mari 😃😃 ? 

[andhra_jp]

On 2/4/2024 at 4:40 AM, tollywood_hater said:

mari darunam raa ayya ... AP lo Vij - Guntur railway line ki 1,000 rupees allocated in budget ........ assalu ee emap chusthy south states entha neglected ooo ardam ayithundi 

 

 

Do southern states face fiscal discrimination? Evidence doesn’t hold up

Why are the southern states up in arms?

Southern states such as Karnataka are claiming that they are being deprived of their legitimate share from central taxes.

Labelled as the “South Tax Movement,” Siddaramaiah’s rally against the Centre follows claims that the state has lost an estimated Rs 62,098 crore over five years in tax share from the divisible pool on account of the sharing pattern laid out by the 15th Finance Commission.

“Under the 14th Finance Commission (2015-2020), Karnataka received 4.71 percent of the tax share, which was reduced to 3.64 percent by the 15th Finance Commission (2020-2025), which is a decrease of 1.07 percent,” Siddaramaiah wrote on social media platform X.com on February 5.

Are their demands justified?

As the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has pointed out, till 2016-17, sales tax/VAT was the largest component of own tax revenue. From 2017-18, however, State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) has emerged as the most important source, followed by sales tax/VAT, excise duty, stamp duty and, registration fees and taxes on vehicles (Chart III.2).

In the post-GST period, there has been a general increase in the share of SOTR(States’ tax revenue), which has helped States to reduce their dependence on devolution from the Centre. 

For instance, in the case of Karnataka, SOTR as a proportion of overall tax revenue has increased from 75.1 percent in 2016-17 to 79.7 percent in 2021-22.

How is the devolution formula arrived at?

The 15th Finance Commission suggested a 41 percent share of states in the central revenues.

Over the years, 12 criteria have been adopted by finance commissions to determine devolution across states. Population has been used as a criterion by all Finance Commissions because the larger the population of a State, the greater its expenditure needs. The area of a state was introduced as a criterion by the 10th Finance Commission as it was felt that the cost of providing basic administrative infrastructure and services is higher in states with a larger area and lower population density. Forest cover was introduced by the 14th Finance Commission as a measure of fiscal disability because even though forests provide ecological benefits, there is an opportunity cost associated with them in terms of areas not available for other economic activities.

Why are the southern states upset?

Southern states, which are relatively fiscally stronger, have pointed out that they should not be getting a lower share because of lower population levels compared to northern states. This, they have pointed out, is equivalent to penalising them for their progressive policies. To address this, the 15th Finance Commission also gave weight to demographic performance.

The Commission gave 15 percent weight to the population parameter and 12.5 per cent to demographic performance while recommending the share of each state in central taxes.

How can the issue be addressed?

The broad issues remain that Central governments of the day have been accepting what the Finance Commission has recommended in the past, including the rise in states’ share from the divisible pool. The 16th Finance Commission, headed by Arvind Panagariya, former NITI Aayog Vice Chairperson, will likely go into it in detail.

That said, there is a compelling case for states to press the pedal on tax reforms and invest in augmenting fiscal/tax capacity. As the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has said “from a longer-term policy perspective, States would benefit from augmenting their fiscal capacity while reducing dependence on transfers”.

 

[bhaigan]

On 2/3/2024 at 2:08 PM, Rescuer7 said:

 

Andu lo tappu emi undi le

South Tax lu dengakapoyi north ku peduthunte evadikanna kaluthadi