30yr old telugu opt student sudden death with brain stroke

[kevinUsa]

విస్తృతమైన సాధారణీకరణలు: "సైన్స్" అంతర్లీనంగా అవినీతి మరియు నమ్మదగనిది అనే ప్రకటనలు చాలా విస్తృతమైనవి. పక్షపాతం లేదా దుష్ప్రవర్తనకు సంబంధించిన సందర్భాలు ఉన్నప్పటికీ, చాలా మంది శాస్త్రవేత్తలు సమగ్రతతో జ్ఞానాన్ని కొనసాగిస్తారు. COVID-నిర్దిష్ట తప్పుడు సమాచారం: సహజ రోగనిరోధక శక్తి: సహజ రోగనిరోధక శక్తి కొంత రక్షణను అందించినప్పటికీ, టీకాలు రోగనిరోధక శక్తికి మరింత విశ్వసనీయమైన మరియు నియంత్రిత ప్రోత్సాహాన్ని అందిస్తాయి, తీవ్రమైన అనారోగ్యం మరియు మరణాన్ని తగ్గిస్తాయి. Ivermectin, మొదలైనవి: ఈ మందులు బలమైన సాక్ష్యం లేకుండా ప్రచారం చేయబడ్డాయి. COVID-19కి వ్యతిరేకంగా అవి స్థిరంగా ప్రభావవంతంగా ఉన్నాయని పెద్ద-స్థాయి అధ్యయనాలు చూపించలేదు. ఆసక్తి యొక్క వైరుధ్యం: స్కాట్ గాట్లీబ్ గురించి ప్రస్తావించడం చాలా ముఖ్యం, అయితే అతని చర్య ఎందుకు ఆందోళనలను పెంచుతుంది అనే దాని గురించి మరింత వివరణాత్మక వివరణ అవసరం.

[kevinUsa]

13 hours ago, CanadianMalodu said:

The virus was made in American and Canadian government research labs with full military and federal government support and then was transferred to Wuhan lab due to biological weapons convention agreement.  All mainstream tech companies have connections with intelligence agencies like CIA where employees moved from one to another and were funded by DARPA.

The vaccines Adenovector recombinant and mRna ones don't have long term safety data. Vaccines are funded by Melinda Gates foundation, and unsurprisingly they took divorce possibly to avoid taxes on Vaccine profits. Pfizer is just distributing them. There is lot more I can write, but Mainstream Press calls it conspiracy anyways. 

ante rich becomes rich and we become poor day by day ante antava bro 

[jaathiratnalu2]

4 hours ago, psycopk said:

AP ki dikku ledu.. mee mohalaki world.. 🤣

Adenti world Cellphone , computer mi CBN invention chesadu kada 

[CanadianMalodu]

1 hour ago, kevinUsa said:

Sweeping Generalizations: #1 The statements about "science" being inherently corrupt and untrustworthy are overly broad. While there are instances of bias or misconduct, the vast #2 majority of scientists pursue knowledge with integrity.
COVID-specific Misinformation:
Natural Immunity: #3 While natural immunity does offer some protection, vaccines provide a more reliable and controlled boost to immunity, reducing severe illness and death.
#4 Ivermectin, etc.: These drugs were touted without strong evidence. #5Large-scale studies have not shown them to be consistently effective against COVID-19.
Conflict of Interest: Mentioning Scott Gottlieb is important, but requires more detailed explanation about why his move raises concerns.

#1 Where did I say science is inherently corrupt and untrustworthy? All I'm trying to say is  information being circulated in the name of science need not be trusted at face value. 

#2 How do you vouch for it ? How do you know their  source of  funding? How do you know where their reputation comes from , their affiliations ?

#3 This is a loaded statement. How do you conclude that natural immunity is inferior to protection offered by Vax ? If so, why are boosters needed to be taken periodically?

#4 There multiple open label studies and empirical evidence that these worked. Remember mahakumbh mela in UP? which was labelled as 'super spreader' event. It didn't yield any different spikes in Covid numbers as advertised and UP government has distributed Antibiotic kits to large amount of their populace. You think both of them have no connection? I personally Azithromycin after having COVID and my recovery was in less than 2 days. I surely can say that's not placebo. 

#5 Cite your large scale studies that you were referring to.

 

[CanadianMalodu]

1 hour ago, kevinUsa said:

ante rich becomes rich and we become poor day by day ante antava bro 

In a world with hyperinflation and supply squeezes that how it works.

[kevinUsa]

55 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

#1 Where did I say science is inherently corrupt and untrustworthy? All I'm trying to say is  information being circulated in the name of science need not be trusted at face value. 

#2 How do you vouch for it ? How do you know their  source of  funding? How do you know where their reputation comes from , their affiliations ?

#3 This is a loaded statement. How do you conclude that natural immunity is inferior to protection offered by Vax ? If so, why are boosters needed to be taken periodically?

#4 There multiple open label studies and empirical evidence that these worked. Remember mahakumbh mela in UP? which was labelled as 'super spreader' event. It didn't yield any different spikes in Covid numbers as advertised and UP government has distributed Antibiotic kits to large amount of their populace. You think both of them have no connection? I personally Azithromycin after having COVID and my recovery was in less than 2 days. I surely can say that's not placebo. 

#5 Cite your large scale studies that you were referring to.

 

well its was not  my thing I just put in  gemini to see  how does the General intelligence  react to it 

I was this was  gemini responded  this way BTW  i dont have that acumen to  to read digest and write about it