Specialist Doctors Refusing To Work In Govt. Hospitals Are Infringing Fundamental Rights Of Poor & Needy Patients: Madras HC

[kevinUsa]

home-iconHomeTop storiesLatest UpdatesNewsCourt UpdatesColumnsInterviewsJob updatesEventsLaw School Updates

Home > Court Updates > High Courts > Specialist Doctors...

Specialist Doctors Refusing To Work In Govt. Hospitals Are Infringing Fundamental Rights Of Poor & Needy Patients: Madras HC

By - Riya Rathore

Update: 2024-04-27 14:15 GMT

Specialist Doctors Refusing To Work In Govt. Hospitals Are Infringing Fundamental Rights Of Poor & Needy Patients: Madras HC

facebook icontwitter iconlinkedin icontubmlr iconpinterest icon

whatsapp icon

The Madras High Court stated that the doctors after undergoing medical specialty courses, refusing to work in Government Hospitals, infringe upon the fundamental rights of the poor and needy patients.

The Court upheld the obligation for medical graduates to fulfil bonded service in government medical institutions.

 

The Bench pointed out that the general public had the right to expect such specialists to utilise their services during their training for the benefit of the sick, poor, and needy. Therefore, it was natural for the government to ensure that such doctors, who have undergone post-graduate training at a very low cost by utilising resources from the poor and needy, serve the poor and needy not only for the country, but also for the State of Tamil Nadu in particular.

 

A Single Bench of Justice S.M. Subramaniam observed, “Providing decent medical treatment is an integral part under Article 21 of Constitution of India. The Government is duty bound to provide treatment to poor and the needy people, who all are admitted in Government Hospitals…Thus, such an approach of the Doctors cannot be appreciated, since medical profession is a noble profession and the conduct of the Doctors must be in consonance with the Rules made by the Medical Council of India and the Government. Tax payers money in huge are spent for the doctors to undergo Post Graduate Medical Courses. Poor people contribute by paying tax in various forms.”

 

Advocate Suhrith Parthasarathy represented the petitioners, while GA K.Tippu Sulthan appeared for the respondents.

 

The petitioners had challenged the appointments made by the Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine under the Tamil Government Servants (Conditions of Services) Act, 2016. Their appointments as Assistant Surgeons were contingent upon fulfilling a bond agreement to serve in government medical colleges and hospitals for a specified period after completing their post-graduate medical courses.

 

The petitioners argued that their service during the COVID-19 pandemic should have been counted towards fulfilling the bond period. However, the Government countered, stating that pandemic duties were part of their training and not equivalent to bonded service.

 

In order to ensure that the services of trained Post Graduate Doctors were made available to the poor and the needy patients, a bond signed by the medical candidates with three sureties was obtained from the candidates at the time of their admission.

[kevinUsa]

https://www.verdictum.in/amp/court-updates/high-courts/madras-high-court-ssahana-priyankaa-v-the-state-of-tamil-nadu-2024mhc1907-specialty-doctor-govt-hospital-fundamental-right-1532722

[Joker_007]

Well give them provisions to break the bond . For eg they need to pay 1.5 crore to break the bond based on the course demand. Also they will be subject to social audit and made public