Jagan opposes SC categorization

[11_MohanReddy]

 

 

[bhaigan]

Supreme Court CJI also made close to similar comments, hence he is also opposing

 

 TDP is not champions of any reservations please mark those words

[11_MohanReddy]

3 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

Supreme Court CJI also made close to similar comments, hence he is also opposing

 

 TDP is not champions of any reservations please mark those words

 

 

[psycontr]

Just now, 11_MohanReddy said:

 

 

Can you tell me in which case the above judgement came ? I mean parties

[ButtonMohanReddy]

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C-DqA4lMga8/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

[11_MohanReddy]

8 minutes ago, psycontr said:

Can you tell me in which case the above judgement came ? I mean parties

The case that he is opposing 

 

 

[bhaigan]

16 minutes ago, 11_MohanReddy said:

 

 

BJP tho unnaru kabatti case gelichanaru anthe, BJP edo target chesthundi but will see outcome of this in future

Justice Bela Trivedi who previously worked for modi in Gujarat gave this verdict

Manda worked for Babu previously kabatti ippudu vachi dappu koduthundadu

Stop this social media hype's bhayya, no use

 

[psycontr]

3 minutes ago, 11_MohanReddy said:

The case that he is opposing 

 

 

I am just asking is this petition filed by AP ?

[11_MohanReddy]

2 minutes ago, psycontr said:

I am just asking is this petition filed by AP ?

The bench is examining if its 2004 judgment in EV Chinnaiah vs State of Andhra Pradesh, in which it was held that Scheduled Castes formed a homogenous group and hence there cannot be any sub-division among them, needs a relook.

[psycontr]

1 minute ago, bhaigan said:

BJP tho unnaru kabatti case gelichanaru anthe, BJP edo target chesthundi but will see outcome of this in future

Justice Bela Trivedi who previously worked modi in Gujarat gave this verdict

Manda worked for Babu previously kabatti ippudu vachi dappu koduthundadu

Stop this social media hype's bhayya, no use

 

The judgement was given in reference to petition filed by Punjab govt no role of AP or TG govts. Punjab highcourt invalidated punjab law citing then AP high court judgement, that is where AP name is getting quoted.

In this judgement Punjab, TN subcategrozation laws are upheld as valid not the AP law.

 

[psycontr]

2 minutes ago, psycontr said:

The judgement was given in reference to petition filed by Punjab govt no role of AP or TG govts. Punjab highcourt invalidated punjab law citing then AP high court judgement, that is where AP name is getting quoted.

In this judgement Punjab, TN subcategrozation laws are upheld as valid not the AP law.

 

@11_MohanReddy

[11_MohanReddy]

1 minute ago, psycontr said:

@11_MohanReddy

Ne yedava sodi aapu...read this for clarity. Their judgement in Punjab violated a previous judgment in Andhra Pradesh. That's why they had to relook the judgement in Andhra Pradesh and change their judgement. 

https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/supreme-court-sub-categorisation-reservation-9488211/

 

[Anta Assamey]

10 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

BJP tho unnaru kabatti case gelichanaru anthe, BJP edo target chesthundi but will see outcome of this in future

Justice Bela Trivedi who previously worked for modi in Gujarat gave this verdict

Manda worked for Babu previously kabatti ippudu vachi dappu koduthundadu

Stop this social media hype's bhayya, no use

 

Bold matter Correction... Todays Judgment was by a 7 member Constitutional Bench...

Out of which 6 members said Yes to this judgement and the only judge that said No is Bela Trivedi...

[psycontr]

Just now, 11_MohanReddy said:

Ne yedava sodi aapu...read this for clarity. Their judgement in Punjab violated a previous judgment in Andhra Pradesh. That's why they had to relook the judgement in Andhra Pradesh and change their judgement. 

https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/supreme-court-sub-categorisation-reservation-9488211/

 

Aparababu... AP govt did not played any role here especially CBN. Period.

 

The hearing of this case completed on in Feb 2024 and judgement was reserved since then.

PARTIES

Appellants: State of Punjab, Director of Public Instructions, Gurbachan Singh

Lawyers: Gurminder Singh (AG of Punjab), Shadan Farasat (AAG), Ajay Pal (AOR)

Respondent: Davinder Singh, Chamar Mahansabha, Lachman Singh

Lawyers: R. Venkataramani (AG), Tushar Mehta (SG), Naresh Bakhsi (AOR), Vipin Kumar (AOR), Tushar Bakshi (AOR)

Impleader: Union of India (Department of Social Justice)

Lawyers: Amrish Kumar, K. Paari Vendhan, Ronak Karanpuria, V.K. Biju, Krishan Kumar, S. Gowthaman

 

https://www.scobserver.in/reports/validity-of-sub-classification-within-reserved-categories-judgement-pronouncement-supreme-court-upholds-sub-classification-in-61-majority/amp/

[11_MohanReddy]

Just now, psycontr said:

Aparababu... AP govt did not played any role here especially CBN. Period.

 

The hearing of this case completed on in Feb 2024 and judgement was reserved since then.

PARTIES

Appellants: State of Punjab, Director of Public Instructions, Gurbachan Singh

Lawyers: Gurminder Singh (AG of Punjab), Shadan Farasat (AAG), Ajay Pal (AOR)

Respondent: Davinder Singh, Chamar Mahansabha, Lachman Singh

Lawyers: R. Venkataramani (AG), Tushar Mehta (SG), Naresh Bakhsi (AOR), Vipin Kumar (AOR), Tushar Bakshi (AOR)

Impleader: Union of India (Department of Social Justice)

Lawyers: Amrish Kumar, K. Paari Vendhan, Ronak Karanpuria, V.K. Biju, Krishan Kumar, S. Gowthaman

 

https://www.scobserver.in/reports/validity-of-sub-classification-within-reserved-categories-judgement-pronouncement-supreme-court-upholds-sub-classification-in-61-majority/amp/

This first paragraph of the link you post. 

Today, a seven-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud upheld the validity of sub-classifications within Scheduled Caste categories in a 6:1 majority, overruling the five-judge bench decision in E.V. Chinaiah v State of Andhra Pradesh (2004).