Andhra's as a kingdom fought for kaurava side in dwapara

[AndhraPickles]

a fact...

[Teluguredu]

Andhra's are not telugu people ,they are indo-aryans who ruled over telugu land.

[AndhraPickles]

https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/andhra

[rational]

15 minutes ago, AndhraPickles said:

a fact...

Is mahabarata real in first place?

[AndhraPickles]

11 minutes ago, rational said:

Is mahabarata real in first place?

it might have been poetically enhanced & explained.....but a great war once happened at kurukhetra, India.....

[rational]

7 minutes ago, AndhraPickles said:

it might have been poetically enhanced & explained.....but a great war once happened at kurukhetra, India.....

Is there a historical evidence to it? Did we find any actual evidence? Like war remains, coins, structures etc

the usual evidence we look for in archaeology.

[AndhraPickles]

20 minutes ago, rational said:

Is there a historical evidence to it? Did we find any actual evidence? Like war remains, coins, structures etc

the usual evidence we look for in archaeology.

Over thirty-five sites have emerged as significant archaeological discoveries, aligning with the descriptions of ancient cities in the Mahabharata. Artifacts such as copper utensils, iron implements, seals, gold and silver ornaments, terracotta discs, and painted greyware pottery have been unearthed at these locations...

https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/mahabharata-much-older-say-asi-archaeologists/articleshow/71658119.cms

[rational]

4 minutes ago, AndhraPickles said:

Over thirty-five sites have emerged as significant archaeological discoveries, aligning with the descriptions of ancient cities in the Mahabharata. Artifacts such as copper utensils, iron implements, seals, gold and silver ornaments, terracotta discs, and painted greyware pottery have been unearthed at these locations...

https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/mahabharata-much-older-say-asi-archaeologists/articleshow/71658119.cms

I will look into it and reply tomorrow. Got to go bed. I have my own doubts about this article. Will do some research and reply, this looks like a good subject to kill my my time for the week end.

[AndhraPickles]

1 minute ago, rational said:

I will look into it and reply tomorrow. Got to go bed. I have my own doubts about this article. Will do some research and reply, this looks like a good subject to kill my my time for the week end.

enjoy...I do the same...

[rational]

14 hours ago, AndhraPickles said:

Over thirty-five sites have emerged as significant archaeological discoveries, aligning with the descriptions of ancient cities in the Mahabharata. Artifacts such as copper utensils, iron implements, seals, gold and silver ornaments, terracotta discs, and painted greyware pottery have been unearthed at these locations...

https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/mahabharata-much-older-say-asi-archaeologists/articleshow/71658119.cms

 i did some research i will post some links of the artifacts that were found on the site,

https://www.worldwidejournals.com/global-journal-for-research-analysis-GJRA/recent_issues_pdf/2016/March/March_2016_1457342184__60.pdf

these artifacts belong to late harappan civilization and bronze era so around 3500 to 4000 years old not dwapara yuga as you mentioned.

u said iron implements, iron age came after bronze age i believe. if u search u will find good evidence for it. if iron implements were found then they might be placed after that. (similarly if you find an lcd tv after digging a 500 year old grave, then it doesnt make sense some one might have placed it)

it is also a burial site, bodies are buried not cremated, in mahabarata epic if you observe the bodies are cremated.

about the chariots mentioned in the article this research paper  gives a different dimension to it plz read it

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346469122_Royal_Chariot_Burials_of_Sanauli_near_Delhi_and_Archaeological_Correlates_of_Prehistoric_Indo-Iranian_Languages
 

women warriors in the burial site?  mahabarata doesn't mention any women fighting in the 18days war (may be i missed) lets leave it to benefit of doubt.

All in all the archaeologists after carbon dating could only prove that the pottery, ornaments, weapons all belong during the late Harrapan civilization.

i will provide few links plz go through them u might get  a better picture of the sinauli archaeological site.

https://www.earthismysterious.com/indias-largest-known-burial-site-is-3800-yrs-old-confirms-carbon-dating/

https://www.academia.edu/93069961/Digitization_Protecting_the_future_of_history_A_case_study_of_Archaeological_site_of_Sinauli_in_Uttar_Pradesh_India

https://scroll.in/article/882188/putting-the-horse-before-the-cart-what-the-discovery-of-4000-year-old-chariot-in-up-signifies

https://journal.fi/store/article/view/98032

 

i hope i made sense. i should thank you, coz i learnt something more about history. 

cheers

 

 

 

[AndhraPickles]

13 minutes ago, rational said:

 i did some research i will post some links of the artifacts that were found on the site,

https://www.worldwidejournals.com/global-journal-for-research-analysis-GJRA/recent_issues_pdf/2016/March/March_2016_1457342184__60.pdf

these artifacts belong to late harappan civilization and bronze era so around 3500 to 4000 years old not dwapara yuga as you mentioned.

u said iron implements, iron age came after bronze age i believe. if u search u will find good evidence for it. if iron implements were found then they might be placed after that. (similarly if you find an lcd tv after digging a 500 year old grave, then it doesnt make sense some one might have placed it)

it is also a burial site, bodies are buried not cremated, in mahabarata epic if you observe the bodies are cremated.

about the chariots mentioned in the article this research paper  gives a different dimension to it plz read it

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346469122_Royal_Chariot_Burials_of_Sanauli_near_Delhi_and_Archaeological_Correlates_of_Prehistoric_Indo-Iranian_Languages
 

women warriors in the burial site?  mahabarata doesn't mention any women fighting in the 18days war (may be i missed) lets leave it to benefit of doubt.

All in all the archaeologists after carbon dating could only prove that the pottery, ornaments, weapons all belong during the late Harrapan civilization.

i will provide few links plz go through them u might get  a better picture of the sinauli archaeological site.

https://www.earthismysterious.com/indias-largest-known-burial-site-is-3800-yrs-old-confirms-carbon-dating/

https://www.academia.edu/93069961/Digitization_Protecting_the_future_of_history_A_case_study_of_Archaeological_site_of_Sinauli_in_Uttar_Pradesh_India

https://scroll.in/article/882188/putting-the-horse-before-the-cart-what-the-discovery-of-4000-year-old-chariot-in-up-signifies

https://journal.fi/store/article/view/98032

 

i hope i made sense. i should thank you, coz i learnt something more about history. 

cheers

 

 

 

nee conclusion with detailed reasoning draft chey...ilage information gather chesukuuntu mundukellu...

Internet archives ebooks untaayi 4 reference : 

https://archive.org/