Repeal h4-ead

[chammakchandra]

2 hours ago, travellerusa said:

Why can’t they apply for h1b if they r ready to compete with h1bs and opts

Who latinos?

[Ara_Tenkai]

6 hours ago, travellerusa said:

Why cant they come through the same immigration process of h1bs and opts

Thats not their fault!! There is a process allowing to work freely provided by USA and they are usung it.

ippudu endi anni vadilesi same H1b laga kavali ani adagala???

[travellerusa]

35 minutes ago, Ara_Tenkai said:

Thats not their fault!! There is a process allowing to work freely provided by USA and they are usung it.

ippudu endi anni vadilesi same H1b laga kavali ani adagala???

Process needs to change. 

[kevinUsa]

 

The H-4 EAD program undermines the fairness and integrity of the U.S. labor market. Allowing individuals who are in the country based solely on their spouse’s visa status to work creates an unfair advantage for H-4 visa holders, bypassing the proper channels of employment-based immigration. Unlike other foreign workers who must meet specific qualifications and compete for limited work visas, H-4 visa holders are granted work authorization without undergoing the same scrutiny or demonstrating the same merit.

This policy increases competition in the job market, particularly in high-demand, skilled industries such as technology, engineering, and healthcare. By allowing an unrestricted flow of workers into these fields, it displaces qualified U.S. citizens and permanent residents, putting them at a disadvantage when seeking employment. The influx of H-4 workers not only saturates the labor market but also drives down wages, as employers have access to a larger pool of labor willing to accept lower compensation.

Furthermore, the H-4 EAD was implemented through an executive order, bypassing legislative approval and oversight. This makes the program unstable and subject to political changes. Relying on executive action rather than a congressional mandate means that the policy lacks the permanence and long-term consideration that a properly debated legislative process would provide. This makes the policy susceptible to abrupt changes, leaving both employers and workers uncertain about its future.

In conclusion, the H-4 EAD program introduces unnecessary competition, undermines wage growth, and destabilizes the labor market. Employment authorization should be based on individual qualifications and the needs of the U.S. labor market, not on the marital status of visa holders. The H-4 EAD is a flawed policy that weakens the integrity of the immigration system and creates unfair disadvantages for American workers.

[Sucker]

39 minutes ago, kevinUsa said:

 

The H-4 EAD program undermines the fairness and integrity of the U.S. labor market. Allowing individuals who are in the country based solely on their spouse’s visa status to work creates an unfair advantage for H-4 visa holders, bypassing the proper channels of employment-based immigration. Unlike other foreign workers who must meet specific qualifications and compete for limited work visas, H-4 visa holders are granted work authorization without undergoing the same scrutiny or demonstrating the same merit.

This policy increases competition in the job market, particularly in high-demand, skilled industries such as technology, engineering, and healthcare. By allowing an unrestricted flow of workers into these fields, it displaces qualified U.S. citizens and permanent residents, putting them at a disadvantage when seeking employment. The influx of H-4 workers not only saturates the labor market but also drives down wages, as employers have access to a larger pool of labor willing to accept lower compensation.

Furthermore, the H-4 EAD was implemented through an executive order, bypassing legislative approval and oversight. This makes the program unstable and subject to political changes. Relying on executive action rather than a congressional mandate means that the policy lacks the permanence and long-term consideration that a properly debated legislative process would provide. This makes the policy susceptible to abrupt changes, leaving both employers and workers uncertain about its future.

In conclusion, the H-4 EAD program introduces unnecessary competition, undermines wage growth, and destabilizes the labor market. Employment authorization should be based on individual qualifications and the needs of the U.S. labor market, not on the marital status of visa holders. The H-4 EAD is a flawed policy that weakens the integrity of the immigration system and creates unfair disadvantages for American workers.

Arey mee voorlo kuda ila spouses ki work permit istharu kadha ra. Maa meedha nduku paddaru meeru 

[kevinUsa]

1 minute ago, Sucker said:

Arey mee voorlo kuda ila spouses ki work permit istharu kadha ra. Maa meedha nduku paddaru meeru 

valla meda kuda nenu ircc ki complain chesa rescind cheyamani as  they are taking job of PR citizens 

[Sucker]

7 minutes ago, kevinUsa said:

valla meda kuda nenu ircc ki complain chesa rescind cheyamani as  they are taking job of PR citizens 

Maa county memu chuskuntam 

[CanadianMalodu]

6 minutes ago, Sucker said:

Maa county memu chuskuntam 

Meeru chosukovalane kadha Kevinu post chesedhi.

[Sucker]

Just now, CanadianMalodu said:

Meeru chosukovalane kadha Kevinu post chesedhi.

Kevin gaaidki aathram yekkuva. Vachi 10ngulu thini pothadu