People claiming EO cannot change constitution..

[ErraBook_monagadu]

This EO is reinterpreting the language in the constitution. Unless a federal court stops it, this new interpretation will be law of the land.

[nenu_meeku_telusa]

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-1-1/ALDE_00000811/

[Pavanonline]

18 minutes ago, ErraBook_monagadu said:

This EO is reinterpreting the language in the constitution. Unless a federal court stops it, this new interpretation will be law of the land.

Evadiki istamochinattu vadu interpret cheskunte meaning emundi, court will do it. That's the whole point of EO, starting the process of lawsuit. 

[ErraBook_monagadu]

3 minutes ago, nenu_meeku_telusa said:

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-1-1/ALDE_00000811/

“and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”

this EO is interpreting jurisdiction thereof. 
 

Claims that if none of the parents are lpr/usc, no jurisdiction thereof on the baby eventhough  birth occurred on us soil. 

[nenu_meeku_telusa]

2 minutes ago, ErraBook_monagadu said:

“and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”

this EO is interpreting jurisdiction thereof. 
 

Claims that if none of the parents are lpr/usc, no jurisdiction thereof on the baby eventhough  birth occurred on us soil. 

No. It’s can’t be decided and made with EO period. End of discussion until something valuable comes out of the ruling instead of some 50 threads screaming unknown statements. 

[ErraBook_monagadu]

You seriously think miller brought this EO without consulting constitutional experts? I won’t be surprised if Supreme Court justices already green lighted this EO 

[shaktimaan]

4 minutes ago, ErraBook_monagadu said:

“and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”

this EO is interpreting jurisdiction thereof. 
 

Claims that if none of the parents are lpr/usc, no jurisdiction thereof on the baby eventhough  birth occurred on us soil. 

oopindi chalu aapuko inka, ivi just optics kosam evadu emi peekaledu, may be SC will make it if both parents are illegal that’s it

[nenu_meeku_telusa]

1 minute ago, ErraBook_monagadu said:

You seriously think miller brought this EO without consulting constitutional experts? I won’t be surprised if Supreme Court justices already green lighted this EO 

If you wish. Let’s wait and see instead of making statements without any real ruling

[psycontr]

11 minutes ago, nenu_meeku_telusa said:

If you wish. Let’s wait and see instead of making statements without any real ruling

US Citizen, LPR are complete subjects of US law. All temporary visa workers including illegals are partial subjects of US law. Foreign Diplomats are not subjects of US law.

Diplomats kids are already excluded. So argument now is complete vs partial subject requriement

[nenu_meeku_telusa]

Just now, psycontr said:

US Citizen, LPR are complete subjects of US law. All temporary visa workers including illegals are partial subjects of US law. Foreign Diplomats are not subjects of US law.

Diplomats kids are already excluded. So argument now is complete vs partial subject requriement

Work visa is generic. There are many work visa categories. Asala let it become a rule. These are all waste of time discussions. If any, he should remove h4 ead. That will definitely help economy 

[futureofandhra]

1 minute ago, nenu_meeku_telusa said:

Work visa is generic. There are many work visa categories. Asala let it become a rule. These are all waste of time discussions. If any, he should remove h4 ead. That will definitely help economy 

Satruvulu ekkado leru ani prove chestunnaru ga

H4 ead tho economy change ayindha lol 

It's not even number to even consider 

[JohnyGalt]

25 minutes ago, nenu_meeku_telusa said:

No. It’s can’t be decided and made with EO period. End of discussion until something valuable comes out of the ruling instead of some 50 threads screaming unknown statements. 

Try reading about the reason for 14th amendment. You will understand the intent.

This kind of scenario never existed before in Supreme Court. This kind of conservative justices majority..

I think birthright citizenship is gone..

[Captain_nd_Coke]

1 minute ago, JohnyGalt said:

Try reading about the reason for 14th amendment. You will understand the intent.

This kind of scenario never existed before in Supreme Court. This kind of majority..

I think birthright citizenship is gone..

What if after 4 yrs next incoming prez signs another eo to enable it? 
 

[psycontr]

1 minute ago, nenu_meeku_telusa said:

Work visa is generic. There are many work visa categories. Asala let it become a rule. These are all waste of time discussions. If any, he should remove h4 ead. That will definitely help economy 

Constitution says: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.

EO interpreting children born for illegals or temp visa workers are not fully subject to the US jurisdiction so they are not eligible for citizenship. This is correct or wrong interpretetion anedhi courts will tell.

[nenu_meeku_telusa]

1 minute ago, futureofandhra said:

Satruvulu ekkado leru ani prove chestunnaru ga

H4 ead tho economy change ayindha lol 

It's not even number to even consider 

I might appear like a hate person but h4 ead definitely brought unskilled people into market. How can a h1 require so many approvals and justification but a h4 ead can just be a McDonald’s manager? If they don’t want to end h4 ead, they should make it like h1 with approvals and possibly consider them under quota.