People claiming EO cannot change constitution..

[nenu_meeku_telusa]

3 minutes ago, JohnyGalt said:

Try reading about the reason for 14th amendment. You will understand the intent.

This kind of scenario never existed before in Supreme Court. This kind of conservative justices majority..

I think birthright citizenship is gone..

Not until it becomes a rule 

[KothaKurrodu]

1 minute ago, Captain_nd_Coke said:

What if after 4 yrs next incoming prez signs another eo to enable it? 
 

Once ppl get used to it. No other prez will change it. 

[JohnyGalt]

2 minutes ago, Captain_nd_Coke said:

What if after 4 yrs next incoming prez signs another eo to enable it? 
 

Supreme Court majority will  not be changed that easily. Barack Hussein Obama is a curse to all immigrants and to this nation.

[psycontr]

1 minute ago, Captain_nd_Coke said:

What if after 4 yrs next incoming prez signs another eo to enable it? 
 

Enable or disable em ledhu once suprement court agrees with this EO interpretetion then next evadu vachina em cheyaleru unless they prove thier case some other way like combining multiple laws and changing interpretation.

[KothaKurrodu]

Just now, JohnyGalt said:

Supreme Court majority will  not be changed that easily. Barack Obama is a curse to all immigrants and to this nation.

Em chesadu

[JohnyGalt]

5 minutes ago, KothaKurrodu said:

Em chesadu

He is the one started this mess with DACA  just days before 2012 elections. Until that time no president tried to use EO to redefine illegals. Then H4 EAD, OPT EAD, I-140 EAD .. And that gave rise for Trump and immigration became a main stream issue..

[Kakynada]

ofcourse  the cons could be ammended, 

in this case of birth right cit they'd need approval from 38 out of 50 states, also the house and senate majority is Rep, 

this is for illegals (mainly hispanics), entering thru borders, and making anchor babies attaining citizenship, and further claiming benefits like free schools, and much more once they get older. All these anchor baby parents are illegals not paying any tax to the gov, but claiming benefits is the point currently being considered closely. No issues for legal non immigrants tho. 

[JohnyGalt]

2 minutes ago, Kakynada said:

ofcourse  the cons could be ammended, 

in this case of birth right cit they'd need approval from 38 out of 50 states, also the house and senate majority is Rep, 

this is for illegals (mainly hispanics), entering thru borders, and making anchor babies attaining citizenship, and further claiming benefits like free schools, and much more once they get older. All these anchor baby parents are illegals not paying any tax to the gov, but claiming benefits is the point currently being considered closely. No issues for legal non immigrants tho. 

Dream sir, dream

[enigmatic]

4 minutes ago, Kakynada said:

this is for illegals (mainly hispanics), entering thru borders, and making anchor babies attaining citizenship, and further claiming benefits like free schools, and much more once they get older. All these anchor baby parents are illegals not paying any tax to the gov, but claiming benefits is the point currently being considered closely. No issues for legal non immigrants tho. 

the way it is worded it will affect h1b/f1/l1 ..not just illegals in 30 days. 

[Kakynada]

31 minutes ago, enigmatic said:

the way it is worded it will affect h1b/f1/l1 ..not just illegals in 30 days. 

youre right, just read it. they were considering illegals, but dam n didnt think they'll include legal non immigrants

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/protecting-the-meaning-and-value-of-american-citizenship/

 

[Joker_007]

BIRTH RIGHT SHITIZENSHIP EO IS MEANT FOR ILLEGALS NOT FOR LEGAL. NO ONE CAN CHANGE IT... 

[futureofandhra]

1 minute ago, Joker_007 said:

BIRTH RIGHT SHITIZENSHIP EO IS MEANT FOR ILLEGALS NOT FOR LEGAL. NO ONE CAN CHANGE IT... 

Dude read it 

Needs to be gc or citizen to get citizenship