yemdoing Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 All states should keep 50% of revenue and spend as they wish. Remaining nirma aunty ki icchukovacchu. I don't know how it's done as of now . Quote
chittugaadu Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 having the same debate with northy neighbors yday after drinks ... they started with why south don't support center political parties and ani ... i explained to them about how South states are marginalized and why we pay for north states ... group lo baaga gujjus and marathi folks unnaru... their argument is Gujrat and Maharastra is marginalized but the people don't have hatred for hindi or they are not discontent with center ani ... don't have any answer to that ... Quote
futureofandhra Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 43 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said: Idhanta already oka Pedda patha thread ayyindhi. 151 vachinappudu Konni places lo tappisthe asadarna Majorities ekkada raaledhu Chala chotla TDP 1000-5000 votlatho poyindhi. Konni chotla inka thakkuva votes tho vodipoyindhi. Eesari madhiriga mukku mokham teliyani vallaki kooda 90,000, 40,000 ee type Asalu levu. So nee pbms majorities not seats? Quote
Teluguredu Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 5 hours ago, chittugaadu said: having the same debate with northy neighbors yday after drinks ... they started with why south don't support center political parties and ani ... i explained to them about how South states are marginalized and why we pay for north states ... group lo baaga gujjus and marathi folks unnaru... their argument is Gujrat and Maharastra is marginalized but the people don't have hatred for hindi or they are not discontent with center ani ... don't have any answer to that ... Tell them that mh and gj are indo-aryan states and have nothing to do with us Quote
CanadianMalodu Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 6 hours ago, chittugaadu said: having the same debate with northy neighbors yday after drinks ... they started with why south don't support center political parties and ani ... i explained to them about how South states are marginalized and why we pay for north states ... group lo baaga gujjus and marathi folks unnaru... their argument is Gujrat and Maharastra is marginalized but the people don't have hatred for hindi or they are not discontent with center ani ... don't have any answer to that ... The conjecture being establishment of justice party in Tamil Nadu and it's spill over effects on the neighbouring states. Quote
CanadianMalodu Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 6 hours ago, futureofandhra said: So nee pbms majorities not seats? Majorities dead give away. Other than KK (vaadu oo leak agent) no one else have come up with those numbers. % votes, election surveys results unna margins, then last 3 elections results other than last one std. dev. terms lo choosthe atleast 3 std.dev dooram lo unnyai. Antha non gaussian distribution ki velle bomma ledhu, when electorate by and large remained same. Quote
CanadianMalodu Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 10 hours ago, socrates said: those north states are burden to india growth decades of north appeasement still north is poor so south has to work assoff to uplift north underline the truth is vote bank, not the development or uplifting if any telugu person is talking about uplifting the bihar or UP, first they should remember uttar andhra or rayalseema Uttaraandhra and Rayalaseema ni evadu develop cheyyodhani cheppadu? Baboru unnadantha oodchi, aa painappupi techi Amravathi pachati polallalo RE kosam tagalesthunnaru. Quote
socrates Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 12 hours ago, CanadianMalodu said: Uttaraandhra and Rayalaseema ni evadu develop cheyyodhani cheppadu? Baboru unnadantha oodchi, aa painappupi techi Amravathi pachati polallalo RE kosam tagalesthunnaru. why you got triggered? are you defending north states wishful begging? Quote
CanadianMalodu Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 3 minutes ago, socrates said: why you got triggered? are you defending north states wishful begging? Em trigger kanipinchindhi? Nuvvu ee oka assertion pettukuni north states are dragging India ani decide ayyavu. Dantlo auxillary component kindha, Uttaraandhra and Rayalaseema analogy ichavu. I'm just responding to that. Then again, let's put your Marxist lens to application. If rich or those that are earning higher should pay taxes, should governments not use that money to uplift poor and /or marginalized? even though they don't pay any taxes. If you think governments should use that money for poor or needy, then is it not dragging rich or those that are earning higher? Quote
socrates Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 5 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said: Em trigger kanipinchindhi? Nuvvu ee oka assertion pettukuni north states are dragging India ani decide ayyavu. Dantlo auxillary component kindha, Uttaraandhra and Rayalaseema analogy ichavu. I'm just responding to that. Then again, let's put your Marxist lens to application. If rich or those that are earning higher should pay taxes, should governments not use that money to uplift poor and /or marginalized? even though they don't pay any taxes. If you think governments should use that money for poor or needy, then is it not dragging rich or those that are earning higher? wow, pro capitalist is defending socialism Quote
CanadianMalodu Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 3 minutes ago, socrates said: wow, pro capitalist is defending socialism And who told you Capitalism and taxes are mutually exclusive? I gave you that analogy because I'm talking to you in Marxist language that you understand better. Indian government capital expenditure is for infrastructure development, which sorts of act as stimulus. Quote
socrates Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 5 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said: And who told you Capitalism and taxes are mutually exclusive? I gave you that analogy because I'm talking to you in Marxist language that you understand better. Indian government capital expenditure is for infrastructure development, which sorts of act as stimulus. this is twist of words, thats your style i know i know capitalism and taxes coexist, capitalism tax money has to spend on better productivity by providing better infrastructure, thats the capitalism but you took the advocacy of uplifting poor which is pure socialism by calling me marxist , your thoughts are turning towards marxist (only for north) Quote
CanadianMalodu Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 2 minutes ago, socrates said: this is twist of words, thats your style i know #1 i know capitalism and taxes coexist, capitalism tax money has to spend on better productivity by providing better infrastructure, thats the capitalism #2 but you took the advocacy of uplifting poor which is pure socialism by calling me marxist , your thoughts are turning towards marxist (only for north) Nah, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's a duck. No two ways about it. I called you for what you are. #1 That's what Indian government is doing with the monies in the Northern States. They are building infrastructure. Did you even look it up? #2 You need to work on your comprehension skills. I gave you an "Analogy" for you to understand. Look it up if you don't understand it. Also, as India is a mixed model, spending some amounts on "Social infrastructure" itself is also not a bad idea. It infact is investing in your own future generations, who will be tax payers when they grow up. Since government intervention is inevitable, I would prefer funding public schooling better with tax monies anyday over money pit vanity projects like Amravathi or Kaleshwaram. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.