Popular Post Jatka Bandi Posted February 20 Popular Post Report Posted February 20 Baa, birthright end avvadam lo kick ledu kaani.. backdate chesi implement cheyadam lo naaku personal kick vundi baa.. adi ayyetattu chudava? 4 Quote
Popular Post allbakara Posted February 20 Popular Post Report Posted February 20 1 hour ago, Jatka Bandi said: Baa, birthright end avvadam lo kick ledu kaani.. backdate chesi implement cheyadam lo naaku personal kick vundi baa.. adi ayyetattu chudava? Backdate chesi thatha ke panganaamam pedadhamani plan aa 4 Quote
andhra_jp Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 US appeals court rejects Trump's emergency bid to curtail birthright citizenship Summary U.S. appeals court rejects request to stay nationwide injunction Trump-appointed judge says courts have never recognized an exception to birthright citizenship Cases are pending before two other appellate courts A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday let stand an order blocking President Donald Trump , opens new tab from curtailing automatic birthright citizenship nationwide as part of the Republican's hardline crackdown on immigration and illegal border crossings. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Trump administration's request for an emergency order putting on hold a nationwide injunction issued by a federal judge in Seattle blocking the president's executive order. It was the first time an appellate court had weighed in on Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, whose fate may ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Judges in Maryland, Massachusetts and New Hampshire have likewise blocked it, and appeals are underway already in two of those cases. Trump's order, signed on his first day back in the White House on January 20, directed U.S. agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States after Wednesday if neither their mother nor father was a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. Trump's U.S. Justice Department had asked the 9th Circuit to by Thursday largely stay a ruling by Seattle-based U.S. District Judge John Coughenour declaring the policy unconstitutional, saying he went too far by issuing a nationwide injunction at the behest of four Democratic-led states. But a three-judge panel declined to do so and instead set the case down for arguments in June. U.S. Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest, who Trump appointed during his first term, in a concurring opinion said a rapid ruling would risk eroding public confidence in judges who must "reach their decisions apart from ideology or political preference." "Nor do the circumstances themselves demonstrate an obvious emergency where it appears that the exception to birthright citizenship urged by the Government has never been recognized by the judiciary," she wrote. The other judges on the panel included U.S. Circuit Judge William Canby, an appointee of Democratic former President Jimmy Carter, and U.S. Circuit Judge Milan Smith, an appointee of Republican former President George W. Bush. The White House and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Democratic state attorneys general, immigrant rights advocates and others have filed a series of lawsuits alleging that Trump's executive order violates the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, which has long been understood to recognize that virtually anyone born in the United States is a citizen. They say the U.S. Supreme Court clearly ruled in 1898 in the case United States v. Wong Kim Ark that the 14th Amendment guarantees the right to birthright citizenship regardless of a child's parents' immigration status. Coughenour, an appointee of Republican former President Ronald Reagan, was the first judge to block the order, which he did by issuing a temporary restraining order on January 23. He later extended that into an indefinite preliminary injunction. Coughenour's decision came in a lawsuit by the Democratic-led states of Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon and several pregnant women. He has called Trump's order "blatantly unconstitutional." During a February 6 hearing, the judge said Trump's administration had sought to deprive children born on U.S. soil of their fundamental right to citizenship by cloaking what was effectively a constitutional amendment in an executive order. If allowed to stand, Trump's order would for the first time deny more than 150,000 children born annually in the United States the right to citizenship, the state attorneys general say. Quote
Jatka Bandi Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 21 minutes ago, allbakara said: Backdate chesi thatha ke panganaamam pedadhamani plan aa ledu baa.. oka 1999/2000 chesina parledu baa. Quote
allbakara Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 2 minutes ago, andhra_jp said: US appeals court rejects Trump's emergency bid to curtail birthright citizenship U.S. appeals court rejects request to stay nationwide injunction Trump-appointed judge says courts have never recognized an exception to birthright citizenship Cases are pending before two other appellate courts A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday let stand an order blocking President Donald Trump , opens new tab from curtailing automatic birthright citizenship nationwide. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Trump administration's request for an emergency order putting on hold a nationwide injunction issued by a federal judge in Seattle blocking the president's executive order. It was the first time an appellate court had weighed in on Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, whose fate may ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Judges in Maryland, Massachusetts and New Hampshire have likewise blocked it, and appeals are underway already in two of those cases. Trump's order, signed on his first day back in the White House on January 20, directed U.S. agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States after Wednesday if neither their mother nor father was a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. Trump's U.S. Justice Department had asked the 9th Circuit to by Thursday largely stay a ruling by Seattle-based U.S. District Judge John Coughenour declaring the policy unconstitutional, saying he went too far by issuing a nationwide injunction at the behest of four Democratic-led states. But a three-judge panel declined to do so and instead set the case down for arguments in June. U.S. Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest, who Trump appointed during his first term, in a concurring opinion said a rapid ruling would risk eroding public confidence in judges who must "reach their decisions apart from ideology or political preference." "Nor do the circumstances themselves demonstrate an obvious emergency where it appears that the exception to birthright citizenship urged by the Government has never been recognized by the judiciary," she wrote. Trump's executive order violates the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, which has long been understood to recognize that virtually anyone born in the United States is a citizen. They say the U.S. Supreme Court clearly ruled in 1898 in the case United States v. Wong Kim Ark that the 14th Amendment guarantees the right to birthright citizenship regardless of a child's parents' immigration status. Coughenour, an appointee of Republican former President Ronald Reagan, was the first judge to block the order, which he did by issuing a temporary restraining order on January 23. He later extended that into an indefinite preliminary injunction. During a February 6 hearing, the judge said Trump's administration had sought to deprive children born on U.S. soil of their fundamental right to citizenship by cloaking what was effectively a constitutional amendment in an executive order. Iyanni kudharav thatha cheppadante adhe shaasanam 2 Quote
jalsa01 Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 2 hours ago, Jatka Bandi said: Baa, birthright end avvadam lo kick ledu kaani.. backdate chesi implement cheyadam lo naaku personal kick vundi baa.. adi ayyetattu chudava? alage citizenships kuda backdate chesi 2000 ki teskupote inka kikku untadi Quote
Jatka Bandi Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 1 minute ago, jalsa01 said: alage citizenships kuda backdate chesi 2000 ki teskupote inka kikku untadi citizenships backdate cheyadam ante? Quote
jalsa01 Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 8 minutes ago, Jatka Bandi said: citizenships backdate cheyadam ante? ante adi kuda backdate chesi non whites ki revoke cheyadam Quote
Popular Post Sucker Posted February 20 Popular Post Report Posted February 20 7 minutes ago, jalsa01 said: ante adi kuda backdate chesi non whites ki revoke cheyadam 1st aa Elon Musk gaadidhi peeki 10ngandi daily saava kodthunnadu 3 Quote
prathap_tampa Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 29 minutes ago, Sucker said: 1st aa Elon Musk gaadidhi peeki 10ngandi daily saava kodthunnadu Correct anna Quote
CanadianMalodu Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 10 hours ago, Jatka Bandi said: Baa, birthright end avvadam lo kick ledu kaani.. backdate chesi implement cheyadam lo naaku personal kick vundi baa.. adi ayyetattu chudava? Adhi avvali ante mundhu ee case SCOTUS ki vellali. Vallu 14th amendment interpretation cheyyali. Danini batti disha nirdesham jaruguthundhi. Quote
Sixers Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 42 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said: Adhi avvali ante mundhu ee case SCOTUS ki vellali. Vallu 14th amendment interpretation cheyyali. Danini batti disha nirdesham jaruguthundhi. SCOTUS EO tho agree chesthe back date pakka chestharu. Quote
CanadianMalodu Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 Just now, Sixers said: SCOTUS EO tho agree chesthe back date pakka chestharu. EO will only date back to Feb 19. Beyond that venaki velladhu. Now it's up to Trump and Congress to make further moves for applying it retroactively. Haiti lo chesaru ila. US lo due process protection clause chala strong. So, choodali emauthadhi anedhi. Quote
ErraBook_monagadu Posted February 20 Author Report Posted February 20 He just signed EO that president will interpret the law for executive branch. Ignore scotus and Congress, time waste. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.