Android_Halwa Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 Good that they gave up, else inkoka dozen countries would have had nuclear weapons…and I don’t think Ukraine has the stature to maintain weapons….Just like Pakistan. 2 Quote
kevinUsa Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 15 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said: Good that they gave up, else inkoka dozen countries would have had nuclear weapons…and I don’t think Ukraine has the stature to maintain weapons….Just like Pakistan. Exactly Quote
Mancode Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 18 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said: Good that they gave up, else inkoka dozen countries would have had nuclear weapons…and I don’t think Ukraine has the stature to maintain weapons….Just like Pakistan. Pakistan ,ukarine ni same category lo Ela estham halwa bro . Ukraine is part of USSR ..ONCE, a part of global super power Clinton is another stupid, he did ukraine to denuclearize and said we will protect u 2 Quote
Android_Halwa Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 6 minutes ago, Mancode said: Pakistan ,ukarine ni same category lo Ela estham halwa bro . Ukraine is part of USSR ..ONCE, a part of global super power Clinton is another stupid, he did ukraine to denuclearize and said we will protect u USSR break up ayinapudu Nukes were placed in Ukraine and that’s how they inherited. Did they have know how to operate ? Did they know how to safe guard and stabilize back then ? Poni did they even had a stable government and enough financial resources to handle the nukes ? Poni an army to protect at least ? What was before 1991 USSR was conpletely different and Post 1991, Split CIS states lo half of them almost collapsed and there were local warlords who controlled regions. What you see now is completely different….but in 1991, Ukraine along with half a dozen states were on the brink of collapse. This is the time when they had to give up nukes… Baltic states, Georgia, Chechanya are examples of unstable things were in the 90’s. Infact, nuclear equipment was missing post break up and there were customers for this equipment. Gaddafi, Saddam, Iran, Syria, etc can be linked to all these things. Quote
Assam_Bhayya Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 inka chala unnayi personal mistakes, dyasa ekkadoo unte ilaanti mistakes avthuntayi thata. e age lo aa thokka lo Uu crane mistakes endukle, madhura gnapakal rewind cheskovachu ga, matho share cheskovachu ga 2 Quote
prathap_tampa Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 45 minutes ago, Assam_Bhayya said: inka chala unnayi personal mistakes, dyasa ekkadoo unte ilaanti mistakes avthuntayi thata. e age lo aa thokka lo Uu crane mistakes endukle, madhura gnapakal rewind cheskovachu ga, matho share cheskovachu ga @Sucker anna laga cigar ekkadekkado petadama 1 Quote
kevinUsa Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 49 minutes ago, Assam_Bhayya said: inka chala unnayi personal mistakes, dyasa ekkadoo unte ilaanti mistakes avthuntayi thata. e age lo aa thokka lo Uu crane mistakes endukle, madhura gnapakal rewind cheskovachu ga, matho share cheskovachu ga Monica ki Inka enni teluso 1 Quote
Mancode Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 2 hours ago, Android_Halwa said: USSR break up ayinapudu Nukes were placed in Ukraine and that’s how they inherited. Did they have know how to operate ? Did they know how to safe guard and stabilize back then ? Poni did they even had a stable government and enough financial resources to handle the nukes ? Poni an army to protect at least ? What was before 1991 USSR was conpletely different and Post 1991, Split CIS states lo half of them almost collapsed and there were local warlords who controlled regions. What you see now is completely different….but in 1991, Ukraine along with half a dozen states were on the brink of collapse. This is the time when they had to give up nukes… Baltic states, Georgia, Chechanya are examples of unstable things were in the 90’s. Infact, nuclear equipment was missing post break up and there were customers for this equipment. Gaddafi, Saddam, Iran, Syria, etc can be linked to all these things. but who is america to dictate whom to have nukes, whom don't ,as america is a saint , ukraine deserves and capable at that time to handle nukes after USSR , many nuclear scientists from ukraine contributed to USSR nuke program and also ukraine was knowlledge hub of science and technology for sure, so pakis, iran, lanti radical islamic nations degara nukes undaag lenidhi, ukraine degara unte enti problem iran, iraq,saddam hussein brought/smuggled nucleaer minerals/equipment anedhi theories matrame, no proof 1 Quote
Android_Halwa Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 9 minutes ago, Mancode said: but who is america to dictate whom to have nukes, whom don't ,as america is a saint , ukraine deserves and capable at that time to handle nukes after USSR , many nuclear scientists from ukraine contributed to USSR nuke program and also ukraine was knowlledge hub of science and technology for sure, so pakis, iran, lanti radical islamic nations degara nukes undaag lenidhi, ukraine degara unte enti problem iran, iraq,saddam hussein brought/smuggled nucleaer minerals/equipment anedhi theories matrame, no proof America dictates lot of things. America runs a cartel…NPT, CTBT, Nuclear disarmament and quite a few other programs. Just in case if you are unware, US and USSR each had 25k nuclear weapons stock pile and enough to bomb the whole world few hundred times and because of these nuclear disarmament, its now standing at 5k. There is MTCR…again to control weapons and US runs this cartel too…and NSG kuda US control chestadi which Russia is a member…Now if you ask the question why US ante probably its the only country in the 90’s which had bigger stakes… Did Ukraine state develop the weapons ? No..they inherited like other 15 states and all of them surrendered. Its quite natural..in case Pakistan turmoil ayina kuda US will be the first to invade and secure nuclear facilities. Coming to proofs, Nuclear centrifuge devices and nuclear blue prints were the most smuggled items in the 90’s. Saddam attempted to buy tactical weapons, Gaddafi and Iran, Syria etc almost all procured in black market…its a well known fact as much as sun rises in the east and sets in the west…proofs vundavu..! Quote
Mancode Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 11 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said: America dictates lot of things. America runs a cartel…NPT, CTBT, Nuclear disarmament and quite a few other programs. Just in case if you are unware, US and USSR each had 25k nuclear weapons stock pile and enough to bomb the whole world few hundred times and because of these nuclear disarmament, its now standing at 5k. There is MTCR…again to control weapons and US runs this cartel too…and NSG kuda US control chestadi which Russia is a member…Now if you ask the question why US ante probably its the only country in the 90’s which had bigger stakes… Did Ukraine state develop the weapons ? No..they inherited like other 15 states and all of them surrendered. Its quite natural..in case Pakistan turmoil ayina kuda US will be the first to invade and secure nuclear facilities. Coming to proofs, Nuclear centrifuge devices and nuclear blue prints were the most smuggled items in the 90’s. Saddam attempted to buy tactical weapons, Gaddafi and Iran, Syria etc almost all procured in black market…its a well known fact as much as sun rises in the east and sets in the west…proofs vundavu..! AQ khan network was main smuggler thing of e nuclear warhead designs & centrifuge devices bro ,iraq,north korea,libya lanti countries ki supply chesindi,but mainly adhi asian countries nunchi leda middle eastern countries nunchi chesundochu or 11 soviet disintegration states nunchi chesundochu ,ukraine chesindi anedhi conspiracy theory e no factual proof ,ilanti theories promoted by see ai ye or kgb or anyother intelligence agency.. Ukraine might not have that strong army of a super power to possess nuclear weapons ,but it definitely have brain power for sure.. Soviet disintegration apude chala nuclear arsenal ukraine gave to Russia... Unna konbi ICBM warheads, atleast to scare russia ,unchi undalsindhi.. inni sarlu russia could have not invaded ukrain.. Quote
appusri Posted March 6 Author Report Posted March 6 7 hours ago, Android_Halwa said: Good that they gave up, else inkoka dozen countries would have had nuclear weapons…and I don’t think Ukraine has the stature to maintain weapons….Just like Pakistan. Manchidhe. Kaani itham anna security ki kattubadi undaali kadha. Or appatlone agreement Russia ni blind ga nammi chesukokunda Ukraine security gaurantee icchetattu cheyaali kadha. Russia has vioilated ceasefire 25 times and occupied Crimea and other parts. Can the parties involved in that agreement get them back now? 6 hours ago, Mancode said: Pakistan ,ukarine ni same category lo Ela estham halwa bro . Ukraine is part of USSR ..ONCE, a part of global super power Clinton is another stupid, he did ukraine to denuclearize and said we will protect u 1 Quote
Anna_nuv_thopu Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 AT&T care… pothe ventruka vasthe konda… US support Ukraine being unofficial NATO member… it will be protected by NATO nuclear countries… Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.