🚨 BREAKING: French President Macron addressed all Europeans to prepare for war with Russia.

[Thokkalee]

9 minutes ago, DonnyStrumpet said:

Russia is wounded too. They are struggling in every way shape or form. This war shouldnt have happened. Putin should give up at least some part of the territory and retreat. Putin created this mess. Ukraine just fought back against the aggressor. Just like any country would do, if they were in same situation. 

Yeah.. they lost too many people.. spent too much money on fighting this war.. they are also recruiting people from other countries to fight the war for them, just like Ukraine.. 

Trump is giving them a lifeline by going for a peace deal.. Ukraine is fighting this war with their people and US’ money.. it is doing US’ job of weakening Russia more and more 

[Jaggadonga]

5 hours ago, 11_MohanReddy said:

 

 

Some news say zelensky ready for deal with US. EU emo full support not backing down from Russian war. Edo nijam. Anyways all credit goes to thatha. 

[CanadianMalodu]

1 hour ago, DonnyStrumpet said:

Russia is wounded too. They are struggling in every way shape or form. This war shouldnt have happened. Putin should give up at least some part of the territory and retreat. Putin created this mess. Ukraine just fought back against the aggressor. Just like any country would do, if they were in same situation. 

Russians are tough mfs. They have history of fighting till the last man. WWII war in then Soviet Russia was a war of attrition. They fought for months to get their hold back each block of their occupied cities. Read on how they took back Leningrad.

Russia is a resource rich country and are nearly self sufficient. They can bypass any sanctions using China, NK and India on adhoc needs. All this started because Obozo and CIA regime change in 2014, not before that. Putin is not going to give up the areas he conquered in Ukraine. 

[DonnyStrumpet]

24 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Russians are tough mfs. They have history of fighting till the last man. WWII war in then Soviet Russia was a war of attrition. They fought for months to get their hold back each block of their occupied cities. Read on how they took back Leningrad.

Russia is a resource rich country and are nearly self sufficient. They can bypass any sanctions using China, NK and India on adhoc needs. All this started because Obozo and CIA regime change in 2014, not before that. Putin is not going to giving up the areas he conquered in Ukraine. 

That will be the nemesis of the Europe. For a change, this is a first time I'm seeing a war in my lifetime without pissfuls involved. 

[Sucker]

2 hours ago, Hitman said:

USA is busy with GAZA..  Trump warned HAMAS.. All hell will break loose ... 

Feb deadline ayyipoyindha anna March deadline ki vacdhadu thatha Hamas meedha 

[CanadianMalodu]

11 minutes ago, DonnyStrumpet said:

That will be the nemesis of the Europe. For a change, this is a first time I'm seeing a war in my lifetime without pissfuls involved. 

Right now it's not a war with Russia. This all looks like a distraction. Actual theatre is in Gaza. 

[nenu_meeku_telusa]

2 hours ago, shaktimaan said:

and if that happens who’s the reason, it’s the CHEETO. No more stupid wars people right 

Yeah. Let the WW3 start and humanity end. Humans need to be reminded who owns the earth. 

[2024]

Russia vadu mundu EU antha piece of $hit Without USA help

[appusri]

3 minutes ago, 2024 said:

Russia vadu mundu EU antha piece of $hit Without USA help

Andhukena Ukraine meedha war ki North Korea army ni vaadukuntunnadu?

ilanti comments choosinappude people are so naive anipisthadhi.

[2024]

1 hour ago, appusri said:

Andhukena Ukraine meedha war ki North Korea army ni vaadukuntunnadu?

ilanti comments choosinappude people are so naive anipisthadhi.

sagam sagam teliste alage untadhi naive laga, Russia vallu nuclear weapons use cheyaledu ukrain meda, adhi ayina telusa???

Nuclear weapons evaru dagra ekkava unnayi telusa neeku

 

[appusri]

40 minutes ago, 2024 said:

sagam sagam teliste alage untadhi naive laga, Russia vallu nuclear weapons use cheyaledu ukrain meda, adhi ayina telusa???

Nuclear weapons evaru dagra ekkava unnayi telusa neeku

 

This is the the dumbest comparision ever I saw. So as per your logic, whoever has more nuclear warheads will in the war? You are naive.

To win a war, you don't need thousands/hundreds of nuclear warheards. Just one or two nuclear warheads will decide the winner/looser. Europe has 16 AWACS and their 130 stealth fighter jets. More than 3000 fighter jets most of the 4.5 gen with AESA radar, high capacity data-link, better avionics. Eurofighter, Rafael, Gripen are the top class in the world in 4.5 gen fighter jets. These enhance European defence capabilities 100s of times better than Russia's capabilities. What does Russia have?  6 active AWACS, they don't have operational stealth fighter jet. Their main jet SU-25 flankers which is 4th gen, upgraded to 4.5 and can't come close to Rafael. Russia's tech is old junk. They can't stand with the European tech.

In nuclear war - only 2 things decide. 1 - First use (who uses the nuclear bomb first) 2. Who has has the highiest capability to thwart the nuclear bomb. Europe's capability in this one exceptionally better than the Russia due to stealth fighter jets, 4.5 gen jets and AWACS.

Europe doesn't have first use policy. Russia also doesn't have first use policy, they dropped it some years back. If, for any reason, Russia sends a bomb, Europe most likely will thwart it (based on their higher capability - they would direct it to ocean or some uninhabited area in Russia) and immediatly retaliate with multiple nuclear warhaeds and annihilate the entire Russia - here again Europe's stealth tech and radar capability help delivering the payload.

There is a third thing -nuclear powered submarines. By the time the war comes to this state, there is no meaning.

[CanadianMalodu]

5 hours ago, Mr Mirchi said:

Yaaa

vaalla anni nukes 1/3 Russia ni maatrame naasanam chesthavi… adhe russia vesthe reverse lo …. Tipper lorry gudhinatte

Yes this is true. Media mental gymnastics valla DBians koncham hadavidi anthe.

[appusri]

If Europe can develop all their weapns within the EU, it would big loss to the US. Currently 63% of their spending goes to the US.

[CanadianMalodu]

40 minutes ago, appusri said:

This is the the dumbest comparision ever I saw. So as per your logic, whoever has more nuclear warheads will in the war? You are naive.

To win a war, you don't need thousands/hundreds of nuclear warheards. Just one or two nuclear warheads will decide the winner/looser. Europe has 16 AWACS and their 130 stealth fighter jets. More than 3000 fighter jets most of the 4.5 gen with AESA radar, high capacity data-link, better avionics. Eurofighter, Rafael, Gripen are the top class in the world in 4.5 gen fighter jets. These enhance European defence capabilities 100s of times better than Russia's capabilities. What does Russia have?  6 active AWACS, they don't have operational stealth fighter jet. Their main jet SU-25 flankers which is 4th gen, upgraded to 4.5 and can't come close to Rafael. Russia's tech is old junk. They can't stand with the European tech.

In nuclear war - only 2 things decide. 1 - First use (who uses the nuclear bomb first) 2. Who has has the highiest capability to thwart the nuclear bomb. Europe's capability in this one exceptionally better than the Russia due to stealth fighter jets, 4.5 gen jets and AWACS.

Europe doesn't have first use policy. Russia also doesn't have first use policy, they dropped it some years back. If, for any reason, Russia sends a bomb, Europe most likely will thwart it (based on their higher capability - they would direct it to ocean or some uninhabited area in Russia) and immediatly retaliate with multiple nuclear warhaeds and annihilate the entire Russia - here again Europe's stealth tech and radar capability help delivering the payload.

There is a third thing -nuclear powered submarines. By the time the war comes to this state, there is no meaning.

One or two nuclear war heads tho Russia ni em cheyyaleru. Second French kintappisthe ICBM capabilities tatthima Europe ki levu. Avi kooda Russia ni damage cheyyatam kastam. Russia has lot of ICBMs to take on entire Europe. 

All these fighter jets pettukuni em chestharu? They can't even enter Russian airspace. Russian S400 batteries will take on these fighters easily. Also Russia is NOT using Su25 as its interceptor or air superiority fighters jet. They Mig 29, 31s and Su27 and 34.

European 4.5 generation Anni complete stealth kooda emi kadhu. Who told you that? 5th generation fighter jets inka war tested kadhu. Russia S400 batteries activate chesthe US Navy ee ani moosukuni coordinates exchange chesindhi Obozo time lo Syria lo. You think European 4.5 fighter jets can fight S400?

Asalu nuclear war ki fighter jets ki em sambandham? 

[Pavanonline]

5 hours ago, Jaggadonga said:

Some news say zelensky ready for deal with US

Vadu ready ayye vachadu, vaddu pommani annadi vellega 😁