🚨 BREAKING: French President Macron addressed all Europeans to prepare for war with Russia.

[Pavanonline]

Oh my dumpu, day one war end chestha ani nelalo ww3 ki techava 🤭

[Spartan]

EU taking this oppurtunity to shutdown Putin and Russian bullying in the name of Energy and Oil exports.

Zelen gadu malli US vaipu chusi..help cheyi ani adigina kuda...oddu ra bhai neek mem unnam ani malli recha gostunnaru...

where were these people in last 4 years...NATO lo join cheskodaniki 3 yrs kinda meeda paddaru...

Trump involve aite..Russia will not loose it stand wrt to Energy control...anduke US ni rakunda cheddam ani plan.

 

[lollilolli2020]

6 minutes ago, Spartan said:

EU taking this oppurtunity to shutdown Putin and Russian bullying in the name of Energy and Oil exports.

Zelen gadu malli US vaipu chusi..help cheyi ani adigina kuda...oddu ra bhai neek mem unnam ani malli recha gostunnaru...

where were these people in last 4 years...NATO lo join cheskodaniki 3 yrs kinda meeda paddaru...

Trump involve aite..Russia will not loose it stand wrt to Energy control...anduke US ni rakunda cheddam ani plan.

 

adi oddu ane kada putin gadu war start chesindii 

[2024]

1 hour ago, appusri said:

This is the the dumbest comparision ever I saw. So as per your logic, whoever has more nuclear warheads will in the war? You are naive.

To win a war, you don't need thousands/hundreds of nuclear warheards. Just one or two nuclear warheads will decide the winner/looser. Europe has 16 AWACS and their 130 stealth fighter jets. More than 3000 fighter jets most of the 4.5 gen with AESA radar, high capacity data-link, better avionics. Eurofighter, Rafael, Gripen are the top class in the world in 4.5 gen fighter jets. These enhance European defence capabilities 100s of times better than Russia's capabilities. What does Russia have?  6 active AWACS, they don't have operational stealth fighter jet. Their main jet SU-25 flankers which is 4th gen, upgraded to 4.5 and can't come close to Rafael. Russia's tech is old junk. They can't stand with the European tech.

In nuclear war - only 2 things decide. 1 - First use (who uses the nuclear bomb first) 2. Who has has the highiest capability to thwart the nuclear bomb. Europe's capability in this one exceptionally better than the Russia due to stealth fighter jets, 4.5 gen jets and AWACS.

Europe doesn't have first use policy. Russia also doesn't have first use policy, they dropped it some years back. If, for any reason, Russia sends a bomb, Europe most likely will thwart it (based on their higher capability - they would direct it to ocean or some uninhabited area in Russia) and immediatly retaliate with multiple nuclear warhaeds and annihilate the entire Russia - here again Europe's stealth tech and radar capability help delivering the payload.

There is a third thing -nuclear powered submarines. By the time the war comes to this state, there is no meaning.

1-2 nuclear warheads tho Russia ni emi chestaru

nuclear weapon use chesaka inka fighter jets tho emi use untadhi antavu, nuvvu nee sodhi

[appusri]

10 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

One or two nuclear war heads tho Russia ni em cheyyaleru. Second French kintappisthe ICBM capabilities tatthima Europe ki levu. Avi kooda Russia ni damage cheyyatam kastam. Russia has lot of ICBMs to take on entire Europe. 

All these fighter jets pettukuni em chestharu? They can't even enter Russian airspace. Russian S400 batteries will take on these fighters easily. Also Russia is NOT using Su25 as its interceptor or air superiority fighters jet. They Mig 29, 31s and Su27 and 34.

European 4.5 generation Anni complete stealth kooda emi kadhu. Who told you that? 5th generation fighter jets inka war tested kadhu. Russia S400 batteries activate chesthe US Navy ee ani moosukuni coordinates exchange chesindhi Obozo time lo Syria lo. You think European 4.5 fighter jets can fight S400?

Asalu nuclear war ki fighter jets ki em sambandham? 

Why do you think they can't enter Russian airspace once the war starts? You are giving too much importance to S400.

https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-sacrifice-air-defense-s400-triumf-cover-losses-ukraine-uk-2023-11

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-25/ukraine-says-it-struck-anti-missile-defense-radar-in-russia

due to the destruction of "several" Russian S-400s in Ukraine, Russia may have to redeploy S-400 systems from "distant parts" of Russia's borders to Ukraine

    Russia could be forced to sacrifice air defenses at its borders, UK intelligence said.
    Losses in Ukraine mean that key air defense weapons will likely need to be redeployed, it said.
    Russia's air defense systems have become a key target for Ukrainian missiles and drones.

Ukraine tho ne kashtam, inka EU tho anta, comedy. Russian weapons are junk, 90s tech.

EU has superior anti-missile systems, not just one, mulltiples.  5th generation fighter jets inka war tested kadhu. Ippati dhaka vaati avasaram vasthe kadha. They have been fully tested, it will definietly give advantage to them.

European 4.5 generation complete stealth ani evaru chepparu? They have more stealth feature thans the Russian ones. 

From the Eurofighter website -

Only 15% of the aircraft’s surface is metal, delivering stealth operation and protection from radar-based systems. It delivers both superior manoeuvrability at subsonic speeds and efficient supersonic capability to support the widest range of combat scenarios.

And Rafale -

The Rafale features a range of stealth capabilities, including radar-absorbent materials (RAMs) and a unique design that reduces its radar cross-section. The aircraft's RAMs are designed to absorb radar energy, rather than reflecting it back to the radar antenna, making it harder to detect.

Nuclear war ki fighter jets samabdham enta? They don't deliver payload, when the bombers are used to deliver, jets can help preventing certain situations like this -

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-its-jets-prevented-us-bombers-violating-border-over-barents-sea-2024-07-21/

 

[appusri]

2 minutes ago, 2024 said:

1-2 nuclear warheads tho Russia ni emi chestaru

nuclear weapon use chesaka inka fighter jets tho emi use untadhi antavu, nuvvu nee sodhi

Mottham chadhuvu. Nuvvu nuclear warhead comparision chesinappude nee knowledge ardham ayyindhi.

[appusri]

 

[CanadianMalodu]

40 minutes ago, appusri said:

Why do you think they can't enter Russian airspace once the war starts? You are giving too much importance to S400.

https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-sacrifice-air-defense-s400-triumf-cover-losses-ukraine-uk-2023-11

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-25/ukraine-says-it-struck-anti-missile-defense-radar-in-russia

due to the destruction of "several" Russian S-400s in Ukraine, Russia may have to redeploy S-400 systems from "distant parts" of Russia's borders to Ukraine

    Russia could be forced to sacrifice air defenses at its borders, UK intelligence said.
    Losses in Ukraine mean that key air defense weapons will likely need to be redeployed, it said.
    Russia's air defense systems have become a key target for Ukrainian missiles and drones.

Ukraine tho ne kashtam, inka EU tho anta, comedy. Russian weapons are junk, 90s tech.

EU has superior anti-missile systems, not just one, mulltiples.  5th generation fighter jets inka war tested kadhu. Ippati dhaka vaati avasaram vasthe kadha. They have been fully tested, it will definietly give advantage to them.

European 4.5 generation complete stealth ani evaru chepparu? They have more stealth feature thans the Russian ones. 

From the Eurofighter website -

Only 15% of the aircraft’s surface is metal, delivering stealth operation and protection from radar-based systems. It delivers both superior manoeuvrability at subsonic speeds and efficient supersonic capability to support the widest range of combat scenarios.

And Rafale -

The Rafale features a range of stealth capabilities, including radar-absorbent materials (RAMs) and a unique design that reduces its radar cross-section. The aircraft's RAMs are designed to absorb radar energy, rather than reflecting it back to the radar antenna, making it harder to detect.

Nuclear war ki fighter jets samabdham enta? They don't deliver payload, when the bombers are used to deliver, jets can help preventing certain situations like this -

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-its-jets-prevented-us-bombers-violating-border-over-barents-sea-2024-07-21/

 

Ukraine ippati dhaka , S400 wreckages choopinchaledhu claims tappa. I recall oke okati choopincharu, adhi kooda ekkado lopala front lines nunchi. Mostly scouts tagalabettindhi oo blast chesindho. Adhi minimal loss. S400 series batteries.

S400 very potent system, India bought three full squadrons. Antha easy kaadhu fighter jets s400 ni face cheyyadam. Ippati dhaka rafale face cheyyaledhu S400 ni. Rafale tho polisthe f16 combat proven. Syria lo s400 pettinappudu Obozo unnapudu US Navy prior ga hotline lo communicate chesedhi flight path coordinates Russia ki just to make sure s400 doesn't shoot down US jets.

Turkey being in NATO still bought S400. 

Also, Russia ICBMs vasthadhi, not bombers. Fighter jets are useless then.

[johnydanylee]

Jai baba vanga

[american_desi]

1 hour ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Ukraine ippati dhaka , S400 wreckages choopinchaledhu claims tappa. I recall oke okati choopincharu, adhi kooda ekkado lopala front lines nunchi. Mostly scouts tagalabettindhi oo blast chesindho. Adhi minimal loss. S400 series batteries.

S400 very potent system, India bought three full squadrons. Antha easy kaadhu fighter jets s400 ni face cheyyadam. Ippati dhaka rafale face cheyyaledhu S400 ni. Rafale tho polisthe f16 combat proven. Syria lo s400 pettinappudu Obozo unnapudu US Navy prior ga hotline lo communicate chesedhi flight path coordinates Russia ki just to make sure s400 doesn't shoot down US jets.

Turkey being in NATO still bought S400. 

Also, Russia ICBMs vasthadhi, not bombers. Fighter jets are useless then.

Russian weapons except for a few like hypersonic missiles are junk.

India bought S-400 because of India's  legacy in military procurement from Russia and cost considerations.

S-400 failed to defend Russia numerous times and Ukraine wae able to hit targets inside Russia several hundred miles .

Turkey's president Erdogan is suspicious of US  support to failed   military coup in 2016 against him.  So he ended up purchasing S-400.

Most of the tanks that Russia owned were destroyed by Ukraine. Now Russia is unable to manufacture tanks  and is using old tanks they moth balled during soviet times 

According to you they have vast resources. Then why are they not able to manufacture enough planes and tanks after Ukraine war started?

The answer is simple. They don't have enough human resources (only 143 million people )and tech. Industry ( no semiconductor manufacturing facilities). Russia is  unable to make a good quality cars anymore. How can they make planes and tanks without semiconductors...lol . 

They have one aircraft carrier that's not working most of the time. 

 

EU has far bigger population 449 million and cutting edge technology. Industry. They have better missile defence shield.

Russia can't dare to start a war with NATO .

A Russian Su-25 jet was shot down by NATO member Turkey in 2015. This happened when the jet briefly crossed into Turkey airspace just for two minutes by mistake near turkey syria border. And Russia couldn't do anything about it. Basically because Putin is scared of taking on NATO. He knows his dictatorship will end if he starts a war with NATO.

Russia briefly had a few trade sanctions on Turkey after the Su-25 was shot down and they had removed them after few months.

If Russia is so powerful why couldn't they protect their Ally Basher Al Assad in Syria like they did in 2015?

Russia spent billions of dollars in upgrading a Naval base in Tartus , Syria and an air base Khemeimim, Syria (they inherited those bases from USSR.)

Russia basically couldn't do anything when the new Syrian government recently kicked them out of their Tartus naval base and Khemeimim  air base in Syria. Thats because Russia no longer has enough people and resources to defend their bases in Syria 

If there's a nuclear war the nuclear weapons france has alone is enough to destroy all of Russia. Basically Russia  having 5000 plus nukes has no meaning because if a nuclear war occurs the whole world is f**ked up. Not just EU and Russia .

Yes theoretically Russia can nuke EU multiple times using those 5000 bombs but realistically speaking even a few nuclear weapons will be enough to destroy the whole economy and make the place uninhabitable for several decades.

[appusri]

1 hour ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Ukraine ippati dhaka , S400 wreckages choopinchaledhu claims tappa. I recall oke okati choopincharu, adhi kooda ekkado lopala front lines nunchi. Mostly scouts tagalabettindhi oo blast chesindho. Adhi minimal loss. S400 series batteries.

S400 very potent system, India bought three full squadrons. Antha easy kaadhu fighter jets s400 ni face cheyyadam. Ippati dhaka rafale face cheyyaledhu S400 ni. Rafale tho polisthe f16 combat proven. Syria lo s400 pettinappudu Obozo unnapudu US Navy prior ga hotline lo communicate chesedhi flight path coordinates Russia ki just to make sure s400 doesn't shoot down US jets.

Turkey being in NATO still bought S400. 

Also, Russia ICBMs vasthadhi, not bombers. Fighter jets are useless then.

S400 potent anedhi just a lie . Idhigo dheentlo vuntayi wreckages

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/09/23/7476325/

Yeah, I know India bought, Turkey bought, China bought because all those countries don't have access to western SAMs as its the most cruicial thing in the defence. Ukraine lo use chesindhi older western missiles, even with the old missiles and the drones S400 couldn't stand. Forget about the new western tech.

https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-s-400-formidable-not-quite-up-to-the-hype-2024-5

Rafale tho F1 comparision aa? Both are generation a part. F16 may have been the best in its generation. It can't be compared with 4.5 gen Rafale. India did extensive trails and tests for MRCA competition. Rafale turned out the best. F16 was not even in the race. Lockheed promised full ToT and 100% manufacting in India. It was not accepted.

Yeah, I know Russia uses ICBMs and don't expect they will only use the ICBMs considering the Europe strong missile defence systems. Bombers have some advantages over the missiles to evade the radars by keeping low and stealth, to indetify targeted location with better precision and can be recalled if the operation is cancelled and it is cheaper and quicker.

Watch the video I posted. Using the fighter jets for dog fights is in the past, it was about creating a movable defence system using the fighter jets and coordinated command control system. It requires 100s of jets.

[human1234]

41 minutes ago, appusri said:

S400 potent anedhi just a lie . Idhigo dheentlo vuntayi wreckages

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/09/23/7476325/

Yeah, I know India bought, Turkey bought, China bought because all those countries don't have access to western SAMs as its the most cruicial thing in the defence. Ukraine lo use chesindhi older western missiles, even with the old missiles and the drones S400 couldn't stand. Forget about the new western tech.

https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-s-400-formidable-not-quite-up-to-the-hype-2024-5

Rafale tho F1 comparision aa? Both are generation a part. F16 may have been the best in its generation. It can't be compared with 4.5 gen Rafale. India did extensive trails and tests for MRCA competition. Rafale turned out the best. F16 was not even in the race. Lockheed promised full ToT and 100% manufacting in India. It was not accepted.

Yeah, I know Russia uses ICBMs and don't expect they will only use the ICBMs considering the Europe strong missile defence systems. Bombers have some advantages over the missiles to evade the radars by keeping low and stealth, to indetify targeted location with better precision and can be recalled if the operation is cancelled and it is cheaper and quicker.

Watch the video I posted. Using the fighter jets for dog fights is in the past, it was about creating a movable defence system using the fighter jets and coordinated command control system. It requires 100s of jets.

Are su-57 good or F-35? Which one should India buy? Or should India buy more Rafale or anything else? For F-35 no technology transfer to India and also it might have a backdoor kill switch 

[appusri]

 

[appusri]

23 minutes ago, human1234 said:

Are su-57 good or F-35? Which one should India buy? Or should India buy more Rafale or anything else? For F-35 no technology transfer to India and also it might have a backdoor kill switch 

 

My lengthy answers below. Naa personal opinion not to waste billions on these. SU-57, I doubt about its capabilities and India came out of JV in 2018 saying it is not capable and doesn't suit our needs. And F-35, its very expensive and I am sure that the US some how control it remotly in crucial times. We don't expect any wars soon, we are strong position compared to Pak and not bad compared to China. We should spend our money on infra and expanding our economy and slowly start developing local defence.

 

 

 

[Jaggadonga]

3 hours ago, Pavanonline said:

Vadu ready ayye vachadu, vaddu pommani annadi vellega 😁

After that incident