Jump to content

BJP pros and cons, last 11 years ruling and party growth


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Teluguredu said:

What countries are even there in south asia as big as india to compare lol .

Rail has zero improvement, it's just all hype ,introduced a train which doesn't even run to its full capability in our tracks for publicity lol.

the only places where infra has improved is in remote locations like north east and border areas in the north.

 

NDA 1 was decent .

NDA 2 is garbage .

NDA 3 will be even more garbage.

Indias image hasn't improved a bit except if you watch godi media ,then of course then india is a developed superpower now.

Bjp has inflated everything ,corruption is normalised now .

In rest of the things there is no difference .both are beggar indo-aryan parties who are intent to spread their cow piss drinking culture while congress does it subtly ,bjp does it openly.

Maybe in leaders there is a difference ,modi speaks like an illiterate monkey while most Indian P.M's were educated regardless of their actions ,they had a dignified demeanour.

same but reverse…

nda 1 was more garbage with one  sided demonetization …nda 3 is bit better…

nda 2 was horrible…with all electoral bonds scams and washing machine policies…

 

Posted
9 hours ago, yslokesh said:

 

Pros: 1. BJP favoured itself by creating a mob hysteria on WhatsApp, Youtube & FB where millions of indoctrinated Hindoowadis keep yelling at Pakistanis initially, but now at the West & China

2. FirstPost channel & 1 billion subscribers who WANT to believe what Phalki says.

3. Uncovering universal fact that Newton copied Laws of Gravity from Kannad Maharshi's scripts ..nee yavva idhi type cheesthoo navvaleeka sachanu.

4. A strong vote bank for next 10 years, who are freshly radicalized via Youtube ... the nisha will come down by next 5-10 years.

5. VishwaGuru -- LOL @3$% Worlds Top 100 lo okka Uni vundadhu..kaani ViswaGuru

 

Cons: ... yeemi leevu ..India is now a Developed cuntry with 4 T economy..@3$%

 

while bjp bhakts maybe radicalised but what harm have they done for nation? they are at their worst confrontational

on the other side I see the anti modi brigade as self loathing scumbags so ashamed of themselves that they are now unsure who their real parents are. they have wet dreams of nation getting destroyed as they dont like the dispensation that currently holds power. Now the dangerous part is they are willing to do anything against the nation

Posted
2 hours ago, kevinUsa said:

All of them has great respect towards science not like current idiot

such was their respect to science that they refused unsc seat thinking respect for science itself will help them in future 

such respect to science that they used to beg america to send ship loads of rice for survival

such was the respect for science they push india to bankrupcy and had to go imf. alas respect for science couldn't help with economy

such was the respect for science that they built toilets for 20% of population. probably they thought women peeing in open fields at night was scientific

such was the respect for science they though let rural people burn sticks/dung to cook probably they made a scientic estimation that in future some idiot PM will provide them with LPG cylinders

@Teluguredu @yslokesh @dasari4kntr

Posted

Other than controlling turkis, Congress govt was better than BJP in all spheres. BJP is basically a party & govt without any vision. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, halwafan said:

Other than controlling turkis, Congress govt was better than BJP in all spheres. BJP is basically a party & govt without any vision. 

please let us know which "sphere" congress was better. also what is congress vision?

Posted
1 hour ago, mazar said:

please let us know which "sphere" congress was better. also what is congress vision?

do a google search .. compare gdp growth, fiscal deficit, unemployment rate, currency depreciation, stock market returns between congress & bjp.. than you will find the "sphere"

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, halwafan said:

Other than controlling turkis, Congress govt was better than BJP in all spheres. BJP is basically a party & govt without any vision. 

True.

Inflation was low when comparing the petrol and gas cylinders rates then and now. International market lo petrol rates appati kante thakkuna unnayi, still the petrol rates are double in NDA govt. INR value almost double ayyindhi.

UPA brought - RTI, RTE (Right to Education act), National Food security act, Land acquisition, Nuclear agreement, MGNREGA, Liberalization, SEZs, Liberalisation.

Crony capitalism was also there to some extent, but the publicity/propaganda against it was at peaks (with the help of Anna Hazare movement and Jan Lokpal Bill drama). Now the crony capitalism (by the Gujju gang) is at its peak. But the publicity against it is very low and everyone is behaving as if its fine behind the Hindu ideology.

Too bad Congress doesn't have a strong leadership. RG is ineffective.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
6 hours ago, dasari4kntr said:

same but reverse…

nda 1 was more garbage with one  sided demonetization …nda 3 is bit better…

nda 2 was horrible…with all electoral bonds scams and washing machine policies…

 

I did not say anything about NDA3 till now ,I am just speculating it will be worse ,it hasn't even been a year.

Posted
5 hours ago, mazar said:

such was their respect to science that they refused unsc seat thinking respect for science itself will help them in future 

such respect to science that they used to beg america to send ship loads of rice for survival

such was the respect for science they push india to bankrupcy and had to go imf. alas respect for science couldn't help with economy

such was the respect for science that they built toilets for 20% of population. probably they thought women peeing in open fields at night was scientific

such was the respect for science they though let rural people burn sticks/dung to cook probably they made a scientic estimation that in future some idiot PM will provide them with LPG cylinders

@Teluguredu @yslokesh @dasari4kntr

Sollu aapara naayana.. 

You are trying to view the circumstances of 1940s with the lens made in 2025 (that too imported from China ..LOL)..

 

1. First of all, India was never a country the same that you see today before British Empire. It was loosely coupled states erring each other every day & night. The British United it and formed an entity now known as Union of India.

2. Why India thought UNSC was not relevant?? India fought with the British for over 200 years. This UNSC is nothing but a power-holding arm of UNO which comprised USA, UK, France - basically the winners of WW-2. How can India join the same power group that UK is part of ?????????????

3. By 1947, India was still in confusion whether to go ahead with Communist USSR or Capitalist Western Bloc. India choose the former as the later is nothing but the remnant of the British Empire, which India wanted to get rid off.

4. Poverty is the only asset inherited by India from British rule, not sure how a country with 90% of population struggling to feed themselves, will want VETO Power of a World Org whose only purpose is Chamchagiri of the world.

5. India still managed to fight 3 times with Porkistan. Integrated several NE States and pulled them into Union of India.

6. India still managed to establish & inaugurate almost all institutes whose name starts with "Indian Institute of **"

.

.

 time leedhu sodara...malli finish cheesthaanu.

 

Posted

You are trying to view the circumstances of 1940s with the lens made in 2025 

Can't agree more on this. History has to be viewed in the context and relevance prevailing at those times and not based on the current times.

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, dewarist said:

You are trying to view the circumstances of 1940s with the lens made in 2025 

Can't agree more on this. History has to be viewed in the context and relevance prevailing at those times and not based on the current times.

 

 

That too with latest versions of iPhone & Macbook in hand, probably sitting at a very exotic location of Americas or Europe...working for MNCs ( the same MNCs which are Hallmarks of Western Capitalism), with high probability of that MNC being an American Company, the same America which tried to nuke India off in Dec,1971 ... the 16th day of Dec,1971 is the ONLY day after probably a millenia when INDIA won a decisive war .....that war being won by a Congressi PM ..

LOL...these realistic stuff of Indian History is very difficult to comprehend for this newly indoctrinated Hindutvawaadis..

 

LOL ...  these idiots who are carrying this Hindoo agenda on Youtube channels could never ever even think of

Posted
11 hours ago, dasari4kntr said:

nda 3 is bit better…

ఎందుకు?.. ముందుతో ఏం తేడా ఉంది?

Posted
7 hours ago, halwafan said:

do a google search .. compare gdp growth, fiscal deficit, unemployment rate, currency depreciation, stock market returns between congress & bjp.. than you will find the "sphere"

is that all you have? google searches and social media news which is fixed with propaganda algorithm? 

come out of that algorithm first. the main question is what reform did congress do to have  better result at any of those you mentioned? btw very conveniently you skipped inflation which was at record level in upa

compare the policies that were implemented first by vajpayee govt and then modi govt with upa. UPA did zero policy work. in UPA they just sat there for 5 years doing nothing

Posted
3 hours ago, yslokesh said:

Sollu aapara naayana.. 

You are trying to view the circumstances of 1940s with the lens made in 2025 (that too imported from China ..LOL)..

 

1. First of all, India was never a country the same that you see today before British Empire. It was loosely coupled states erring each other every day & night. The British United it and formed an entity now known as Union of India.

2. Why India thought UNSC was not relevant?? India fought with the British for over 200 years. This UNSC is nothing but a power-holding arm of UNO which comprised USA, UK, France - basically the winners of WW-2. How can India join the same power group that UK is part of ?????????????

3. By 1947, India was still in confusion whether to go ahead with Communist USSR or Capitalist Western Bloc. India choose the former as the later is nothing but the remnant of the British Empire, which India wanted to get rid off.

4. Poverty is the only asset inherited by India from British rule, not sure how a country with 90% of population struggling to feed themselves, will want VETO Power of a World Org whose only purpose is Chamchagiri of the world.

5. India still managed to fight 3 times with Porkistan. Integrated several NE States and pulled them into Union of India.

6. India still managed to establish & inaugurate almost all institutes whose name starts with "Indian Institute of **"

.

.

 time leedhu sodara...malli finish cheesthaanu.

 

ok we can forgive nehru for being naive and india just got freedom and we cant compare with 1940s times.  why are you nitpicking just the 1st point and conveniently ignoring the remaining?

all the scientific loving PMs failed to do in 60 years and left it for an idiotic PM

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...