11_MohanReddy Posted April 7 Author Report Posted April 7 3 hours ago, Teluguredu said: China isn't a communist country in the first place . Quote
Teluguredu Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 3 minutes ago, 11_MohanReddy said: 187 million 😂😂😂 Quote
11_MohanReddy Posted April 7 Author Report Posted April 7 1 minute ago, Teluguredu said: 187 million 😂😂😂 1 hour ago, 11_MohanReddy said: Why do you think China is so homogeneous with only Hans. What happened at Tianamese Square Quote
Pavanonline Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 1 hour ago, aratipandu said: It was a communist country for sure, no dispute here...it sure still is, you may disagree on this part... it used to be fully communist before Nixon, now it's quasi culturally communist but capitalist in most of economy. Quote
yslokesh Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 1 hour ago, Conman said: Mana telugu states lo who killed most ani adugu bhayya okasari last 100-200 years lo. @futureofandhra and @Sizzler waiting for results. Thx NTRs regime - need to include Karamchedu massacre, pre & post Vangaveeti Ranga death and suicides in Komma colleges due to ragging by Kommas. VS YS Family Regime: Innumerable deaths related to Beggarseema factionism sponsored by Yesu family. Difficult to decide. 1 Quote
Teluguredu Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 4 hours ago, 11_MohanReddy said: China had the concept of "chinese " nation from early mediaeval times ,which means all the other people assimilated into han. Quote
11_MohanReddy Posted April 7 Author Report Posted April 7 41 minutes ago, Teluguredu said: China had the concept of "chinese " nation from early mediaeval times ,which means all the other people assimilated into han. assimilate kakapothe assassinate ee kada Quote
Teluguredu Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 Just now, 11_MohanReddy said: assimilate kakapothe assassinate ee kada That's how medivial times worked ,same with tg who are more gondi and Kannadiga influenced and were converted to telugu . Even Maharashtrians once were kannadigas ,Maharashtrians are slowly taking away Kannadiga land ,even today, northern karnataka is seeing spread of Marathi. Quote
11_MohanReddy Posted April 7 Author Report Posted April 7 Just now, Teluguredu said: That's how medivial times worked ,same with tg who are more gondi and Kannadiga influenced and were converted to telugu . Even Maharashtrians once were kannadigas ,Maharashtrians are slowly taking away Kannadiga land ,even today, northern karnataka is seeing spread of Marathi. TG enta langa ayina kani they didn't kill people like the Han dynasty. Chinese history is most evil in the recent times. Quote
Teluguredu Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 1 minute ago, 11_MohanReddy said: TG enta langa ayina kani they didn't kill people like the Han dynasty. Chinese history is most evil in the recent times. I am talking about telugu people assimilating gondis / Kannadiga people in TG into telugu fold . I gave you an example of how less dominant cultures assmilate into dominant ones ,doesn't always need to be violent Quote
11_MohanReddy Posted April 7 Author Report Posted April 7 4 minutes ago, Teluguredu said: I am talking about telugu people assimilating gondis / Kannadiga people in TG into telugu fold . I gave you an example of how less dominant cultures assmilate into dominant ones ,doesn't always need to be violent Basically if Aryans were violent, the assimilation would have been as flawless as Hans in China antaavu. Ok. Quote
Teluguredu Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 2 minutes ago, 11_MohanReddy said: Basically if Aryans were violent, the assimilation would have been as flawless as Hans in China antaavu. Ok. Nice attempt bro but your logic won't apply because dominant culture india wasn't indo-aryan culture when they came . Also there are no indo-aryans in south india.even then their beggar culture has infiltrated us because of them having a bigger base .what has happened in south india is an example of dominant culture influencing smaller culture but Dravidian culture is still present because it already had a big base by itself. Quote
11_MohanReddy Posted April 7 Author Report Posted April 7 28 minutes ago, Teluguredu said: Nice attempt bro but your logic won't apply because dominant culture india wasn't indo-aryan culture when they came . Also there are no indo-aryans in south india.even then their beggar culture has infiltrated us because of them having a bigger base .what has happened in south india is an example of dominant culture influencing smaller culture but Dravidian culture is still present because it already had a big base by itself. They should have killed Dravidians for better assimilation like the Hans antaavu Quote
Teluguredu Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 2 minutes ago, 11_MohanReddy said: They should have killed Dravidians for better assimilation like the Hans antaavu They already have invaded north india ,that's the reason most of north india speaks indo-aryan languages. Quote
11_MohanReddy Posted April 7 Author Report Posted April 7 2 minutes ago, Teluguredu said: They already have invaded north india ,that's the reason most of north india speaks indo-aryan languages. The problem is they didn't kill as many natives as Hans from China did. That's why there is no assimilation. If they were like Hans who promoted Mandarin over other native languages, we wouldn't be in this situation. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.