Information overloaded era...it's unnatural

[Bhavarogi]

3 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Those that advocate censorship try to impose it by "might". Might will translate position of power influenced muscle and /or money, which is generally "state" and those that run it. 

Change only comes when those that never held power also while power. No Censorship helps with that part. 

 

 

can`t disagree. its a cycle free speech-disagreements- reactions- violence-fed up with unrest- sanity restoration- free speech. 

"Yada yada hi dharmasya glanirbhavati bharata

Abhythanamadharmasya tadatmanam srijamyaham

 

Paritranaya sadhunang vinashay cha dushkritam

Dharmasangsthapanarthay sambhabami yuge yuge"

[CanadianMalodu]

48 minutes ago, vorey_peteruuu said:

mind control, freemasons, hypnosis

Those existed even before as well. PsyOps by masonic Zionists were even crafted better in times of information as well. 

I will give you one example here: Consider COVID. It has good elements of PsyOps too. MSM was used to scaremonger public, give up their rights in exchange for security while state overstepped their powers, and bullied public to get vaxed. Now this is my perspective. Even if you believe otherwise, let's look at  the scenario of Vax mandate.

This plus lack of sufficient safety data (underreported side effects) made me reject Vax. I was able to do that, because I looked at scientific evidence for those Vax being "unsafe" . Now if you think and believe otherwise, and you enforce that will (by the power of state), you are then going to enforce censorship on "pessimists" . When you have absolute free speech, even pessimists "have" access to the information. 

 

[Bhavarogi]

9 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Those existed even before as well. PsyOps by masonic Zionists were even crafted better in times of information as well. 

I will give you one example here: Consider COVID. It has good elements of PsyOps too. MSM was used to scaremonger public, give up their rights in exchange for security while state overstepped their powers, and bullies to get vaxed. Now this is my perspective. Even if you believe otherwise, let's look at  the scenario of Vax mandate.

This plus lack of sufficient safety data (underreported side effects) made me reject Vax. I was able to do that, because I looked scientific evidence for those Vax being "unsafe" . Now if you think and believe otherwise, and you enforce that will (by the power of state), you are going to enforce censorship on "pessimists" then. When you have absolute free speech, even pessimists "have" access to the information. 

 

if not mandate i would`ve skipped it too. lucky you had choice.