My somewhat controversial take on the Operation Sindhoor. Here me out...

[hunkyfunky3]

Is it needed or justified ? 

-> Absolutely yes. It's also an opportunity to take down knowns targets. 

Is it effective in the long run?

-> Most likely no. It's just to pacify and satisfy the indian public and for optics. 

What next ?
-> Pakistan will do a bit of retaliation and things will go back to status quo eventually. 

Why? 

-> Neither countries want War. Some say India can destroy Pak in no time... no, in modern wars there is no winner. Both are losers. 

Is it ? 

-> Just look at all the conflicts. in the last 50 years. Name one winner. Russia most recently thought the same about Ukraine. Look what happened. 

What is most effective? 

-> Counter terrorism , long term covert operations. Gain public support and improve economy (despite the setbacks) 

Why they don't do it? 

-> Politically no gain. 

 

 

[futureofandhra]

2 minutes ago, hunkyfunky3 said:

Is it needed or justified ? 

-> Absolutely yes. It's also an opportunity to take down knowns targets. 

Is it effective in the long run?

-> Most likely no. It's just to pacify and satisfy the indian public and for optics. 

What next ?
-> Pakistan will do a bit of retaliation and things will go back to status quo eventually. 

Why? 

-> Neither countries want War. Some say India can destroy Pak in no time... no, in modern wars there is no winner. Both are losers. 

Is it ? 

-> Just look at all the conflicts. in the last 50 years. Name one winner. Russia most recently thought the same about Ukraine. Look what happened. 

What is most effective? 

-> Counter terrorism , long term covert operations. Gain public support and improve economy (despite the setbacks) 

Why they don't do it? 

-> Politically no gain. 

 

 

did u check how much land russia gained?

[hunkyfunky3]

1 hour ago, futureofandhra said:

did u check how much land russia gained?

Yes, 

but overall India lost and losing land ...

Check international maps...

Huge chunk of land is in PoK and CoK

[Spartan]

Is it effective in the long run?

-> Most likely no. It's just to pacify and satisfy the indian public and for optics.     > Politics lol...

Long run lo enduku effective kaadu...we targetted their training camps , which were breeding those pigs and sent over LOC.

this destruction will slowdown the process, and they will be scared to build up another such terror camps..or start using military camps..

then we can show case relatiion between pakis and those pigs...

 

Long run lo enduku effective kaadu anukuntav... 

a second response tarvata...next lines chadavaledu nenu ne post lo..

[Spartan]

@Raisins_72   chusava...kotta edupu creativity.. titles..

"My somewhat controversial take..."    "hear me out..." .... "risky post..."

  tone marutundi.... 

[futureofandhra]

5 minutes ago, hunkyfunky3 said:

Yes, 

but overall India lost and losing land ...

Check international maps...

Huge chunk of land is in PoK and CoK

talk future dude not past

with china yes india losing land

with pak not yet game just started

[Raisins_72]

2 minutes ago, Spartan said:

@Raisins_72   chusava...kotta edupu creativity.. titles..

"My somewhat controversial take..."    "hear me out..." .... "risky post..."

  tone marutundi.... 

surprised to see the threads from ppl like @hunkyfunky3 @DonnyStrumpet - asalu Liberandus still hiding somewhere. Botthiga accountability lekunda pothundhi maa Liberandu yedhavalaki 😂😂

[Raisins_72]

4 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

talk future dude not past

with china yes india losing land

with pak not yet game just started

[Spartan]

Just now, Raisins_72 said:

surprised to see the threads from ppl like @hunkyfunky3 @DonnyStrumpet - asalu Liberandus still hiding somewhere. Botthiga accountability lekunda pothundhi maa Liberandu yedhavalaki 😂😂

ostaru oka 2 days wait cheyi... chetta eruku ravali kada... reddit, twitter nunchi.

[futureofandhra]

2 minutes ago, Raisins_72 said:

meeku nijalu nachav anna

[mazar]

1 hour ago, hunkyfunky3 said:

Is it needed or justified ? 

-> Absolutely yes. It's also an opportunity to take down knowns targets. 

Is it effective in the long run?

-> Most likely no. It's just to pacify and satisfy the indian public and for optics. 

What next ?
-> Pakistan will do a bit of retaliation and things will go back to status quo eventually. 

Why? 

-> Neither countries want War. Some say India can destroy Pak in no time... no, in modern wars there is no winner. Both are losers. 

Is it ? 

-> Just look at all the conflicts. in the last 50 years. Name one winner. Russia most recently thought the same about Ukraine. Look what happened. 

What is most effective? 

-> Counter terrorism , long term covert operations. Gain public support and improve economy (despite the setbacks) 

Why they don't do it? 

-> Politically no gain. 

 

 

congress party followed exactly your play book...... and were reduced to 44 &52 seats

 

[DonnyStrumpet]

10 minutes ago, Spartan said:

@Raisins_72   chusava...kotta edupu creativity.. titles..

"My somewhat controversial take..."    "hear me out..." .... "risky post..."

  tone marutundi.... 

in my case, just questioning here and there. Too many boot lickers are making this db boring. Hence I’m trying to play a role of a critic. 

[krishnaaa]

1 hour ago, hunkyfunky3 said:

Is it needed or justified ? 

-> Absolutely yes. It's also an opportunity to take down knowns targets. 

Is it effective in the long run?

-> Most likely no. It's just to pacify and satisfy the indian public and for optics. 

What next ?
-> Pakistan will do a bit of retaliation and things will go back to status quo eventually. 

Why? 

-> Neither countries want War. Some say India can destroy Pak in no time... no, in modern wars there is no winner. Both are losers. 

Is it ? 

-> Just look at all the conflicts. in the last 50 years. Name one winner. Russia most recently thought the same about Ukraine. Look what happened. 

What is most effective? 

-> Counter terrorism , long term covert operations. Gain public support and improve economy (despite the setbacks) 

Why they don't do it? 

-> Politically no gain. 

 

 

Suspension of water treaty is the bigger attack long term. Very good move.

Escalating even more isn't the right move. 

Pakistan is even more weak now.

Balochistan rebels also got stronger in the interim.

[Raisins_72]

2 minutes ago, DonnyStrumpet said:

in my case, just questioning here and there. Too many boot lickers are making this db boring. Hence I’m trying to play a role of a critic. 

I sensed it in a different way - thought u r trying to mock them who questioned until yesterday 😃

[CanadianMalodu]

1 hour ago, hunkyfunky3 said:

Is it needed or justified ? 

-> Absolutely yes. It's also an opportunity to take down knowns targets. 

Is it effective in the long run?

-> Most likely no. It's just to pacify and satisfy the indian public and for optics. 

What next ?
-> Pakistan will do a bit of retaliation and things will go back to status quo eventually. 

Why? 

-> Neither countries want War. Some say India can destroy Pak in no time... no, in modern wars there is no winner. Both are losers. 

Is it ? 

-> Just look at all the conflicts. in the last 50 years. Name one winner. Russia most recently thought the same about Ukraine. Look what happened. 

What is most effective? 

-> Counter terrorism , long term covert operations. Gain public support and improve economy (despite the setbacks) 

Why they don't do it? 

-> Politically no gain. 

 

 

I think it's opposite. This entire episode is a theatre created to get back POK. Indian Govt. has been vocal about it for quite sometime now. This is straight from Nethanyahu's  and Putin's play book. The former did it with Hamas (funded them, they attacked Israel and Israel is in the process for capturing Gaza) and latter did that in Chechanya to consolidate power in Russia. Russia swiftly took away territory in Ukraine too.

1. Modi gains immense public opinion and secures next term and likely two terms. Whether he remains for two terms is a different story. All policy failures get buried.  

2. He will be hailed as next SARDAR VALLABHAI PATEL due to taking back POK.

3. US benefits tremendously from arms sales with millions of $$ going into kick backs. Some of that goes to Pakistani Military and political elite.  Tatah can show this as victory for American arms and claims he got peace.

4. India will have to support Israel for annexing Gaza. 

 

There are no real losers here.