11_MohanReddy Posted May 11 Author Report Posted May 11 Operation Sindoor vs. Operation Bunyan Ul Marsoos Some of the firsts One : Realizing the stalemated status or irrelevance of the UNSC, India didn’t seek to request sympathy from the five of the 1945. Operation Sindoor clearly demonstrated a strong sense of self-confidence and real strategic autonomy and sovereignty. Two: For the first time, India shredded the notion that terrorists are separate from terrorist backers and thus targeted both. The notion that certain powerful rogue officers of Pakistani State authorize terrorist attacks was also shredded. This is a new paradigm. Another type of deniability must be invented. Third: There was a battle going and a war being planned. In the midst of the battle, Pakistan negotiated for a loan from the IMF, which surprisingly approved it. It matters because most likely Pakistan isn’t fit enough to finance a war but has capabilities to engage in battles. A war can't be won with IMF loans anyway. Fourth: The strategic patience and cultural restraint have a limit. That limit was tested on April 22 by the Lashkar Teyba terrorists. Perhaps they wanted what followed. They didn’t benefit from their adventure though. Perhaps they wanted to humiliate India publicly. They seem to be mentally stuck in 2008. Fifth: Size matters. Every inch of Pakistan was under reach. I always thought the Nur Khan airbase was the best defended base of Pakistan. It isn’t. The grarrison town of Rawilpindi as the heart of Pakistan’s military and its best-known airbase was hit. Sixth: Pakistan lost the monopoly over Islamic Fatwa. The Indian ulema presented a fatwa of their own to their own government. Thus, the religious dimension always exploited by Pakistan to earn sympathy from the Muslim Ummah evaporated. Deoband is located in India by the way. Seventh: Keeping secrets in a democratic society is next to impossible, but very little leaked out of India, which shows enormous skills in adhering to principles of operational silence and public unity to assist in safeguarding of secrets. Note: I have seen very little or no visuals from Operation Bunyan Ul Marsoos to comment on. Seemingly, it never took off the way it was propagated. The ceasefire saved Pakistan’s skin. Pakistan military leadership has made statements and claims over their own achievements, but the Indian skies remained open, flights weren’t cancelled, and I haven’t seen visuals of missiles landing in Delhi or Amritsar. Quote
Mancode Posted May 11 Report Posted May 11 Seventh : Modi could've asked IAF to destroy all remaining terror bases,but eager to make a cease fire deal with pakis Quote
mazar Posted May 11 Report Posted May 11 34 minutes ago, Mancode said: Seventh : Modi could've asked IAF to destroy all remaining terror bases,but eager to make a cease fire deal with pakis you cant destroy terror bases with official armed forces it gives them an opportunity to retaliate did pak attack india directly wit hits army? no right they did pahalgam. so we should sent agents who should bump off leaders of terror orgs keeping indian govt hands cleans seems like you had lots of redbull. so take some rest first after all that marathon watching of arnab goswami 1 Quote
dasari4kntr Posted May 11 Report Posted May 11 do you really thinks trump understands these operation meanings..? since we are at foot of trump ….does he really thinks about sindoor meaning or emotion behind it..? Quote
11_MohanReddy Posted May 11 Author Report Posted May 11 6 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said: do you really thinks trump understands these operation meanings..? since we are at foot of trump ….does he really thinks about sindoor meaning or emotion behind it..? He doesn't. But US is the one that funded Pakistan's nuclear program. They know exactly where their warheads and what happens if Asim Munir or Government gets thrown out. Imagine if terrorists will have access to warheads Quote
Mancode Posted May 11 Report Posted May 11 1 hour ago, mazar said: you cant destroy terror bases with official armed forces it gives them an opportunity to retaliate did pak attack india directly wit hits army? no right they did pahalgam. so we should sent agents who should bump off leaders of terror orgs keeping indian govt hands cleans seems like you had lots of redbull. so take some rest first after all that marathon watching of arnab goswami I watched 99tv for 5 min and then twitter Quote
Joker_007 Posted May 11 Report Posted May 11 9 hours ago, 11_MohanReddy said: He doesn't. But US is the one that funded Pakistan's nuclear program. They know exactly where their warheads and what happens if Asim Munir or Government gets thrown out. Imagine if terrorists will have access to warheads Idhem curiousity ra babu... once it is bombed what are they going to do after that..Raid that place and loot some of the war heads... ? 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.