To all DB members who are asking who is on India's side

[Teluguredu]

9 hours ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Let's look at the dichotomy here.

1. On one side, your argument is that Indo Aryan culture and religion i.e., Hinduism is being pushed on South of India and there by making it entrenched. If your line of argument is along these lines, then  Indo Aryan stock people are adamantly sticking to Hinduism, and religious and culture elements associated with it. 

2. Then how can the very same people convert to Islam at will in Kashmir? What do you think converted them to Islam?

 

That's what I am saying ,neither south indians nor kashmiris were ethnically cleansed . It happened in north india and west asia. 

I am saying it's good for kashmiris to give up islam too but it's their choice, I can only talk about south indians.

 

Also in the last para I am talking about indo-aryan cleansing of native population in north india and west asia during 1500-1000 BCE ,I never said anything about south india.

[Teluguredu]

8 hours ago, summer27 said:

 

first you need to learn your histroy bro..notiki vachindi vagoddu..you are simply denying the history and the facts that all the kashmiri pandits were masacarred and left the state..asalu neelanti vaadiki ilaa fake alternatives spread cheyyadaniki chance, forum ivvakoodadu..you are more dangerous than those terrorists..

You don't know what you are talking about ,kashmiri pandits are like 2-3% of the population ,they were the ruling class and most kashmiris wanted a seperate state but kashmiri pandits didn't cause they would lose prominence if that happened ,so they supported merging with india which lead to frictions and finally tensions hit booking point and exodus happened.

 

You have no idea about the ethnic groups in kashmir and what country they support ,not everyone in kashmir is a kashmiri ,there are Muslim paharis in pok and dogras in iok.ethnic kashmiris are present mostly in iok not pok.

Ethnic kashmiri muslims who are 95%+ in iok are the ones who want an independant state for themselves while paharis in pok side with pakistan and dogras in iok side with india.

Terrorist anta lol konchem burra vaadi history nerchuko oorike telikunda cheppindhe cheppodhu.

[mazar]

5 hours ago, naughty15 said:

India now realized no country supporting even Russia tooo bcoz of china.  Modi thinks great leader outside of India all says friend bs etc. but when needed all shows middle finger 

why do you need other country support? we dont beg for loans and weapons... we buy them at our will

[mazar]

47 minutes ago, Teluguredu said:

You don't know what you are talking about ,kashmiri pandits are like 2-3% of the population ,they were the ruling class and most kashmiris wanted a seperate state but kashmiri pandits didn't cause they would lose prominence if that happened ,so they supported merging with india which lead to frictions and finally tensions hit booking point and exodus happened.

 

You have no idea about the ethnic groups in kashmir and what country they support ,not everyone in kashmir is a kashmiri ,there are Muslim paharis in pok and dogras in iok.ethnic kashmiris are present mostly in iok not pok.

Ethnic kashmiri muslims who are 95%+ in iok are the ones who want an independant state for themselves while paharis in pok side with pakistan and dogras in iok side with india.

Terrorist anta lol konchem burra vaadi history nerchuko oorike telikunda cheppindhe cheppodhu.

abbha abbha entha sweet language lo chepparo meeru......wow meeku oka salute......

eppudu ilage matladthara leka only ee topic aa? arey yevaraina eenaki nobel prize ivvandi ra

[CanadianMalodu]

1 hour ago, Teluguredu said:

That's what I am saying ,neither south indians nor kashmiris were ethnically cleansed . It happened in north india and west asia. 

I am saying it's good for kashmiris to give up islam too but it's their choice, I can only talk about south indians.

 

Also in the last para I am talking about indo-aryan cleansing of native population in north india and west asia during 1500-1000 BCE ,I never said anything about south india.

May be my question was not clear. If Indo Aryan stock are holding dearly to Hindusim, and it's customs, which you feel is alien to Southern India, Why did they convert to Islam in Kashmir?

They are rooted in Hindusim then, right? What made them to convert to Islam ? I'm not even talking about the time aof militancy in Kashmir valley. I'm talking about time even much further back in the past. 

[summer27]

8 hours ago, Teluguredu said:

You don't know what you are talking about ,kashmiri pandits are like 2-3% of the population ,they were the ruling class and most kashmiris wanted a seperate state but kashmiri pandits didn't cause they would lose prominence if that happened ,so they supported merging with india which lead to frictions and finally tensions hit booking point and exodus happened.

 

You have no idea about the ethnic groups in kashmir and what country they support ,not everyone in kashmir is a kashmiri ,there are Muslim paharis in pok and dogras in iok.ethnic kashmiris are present mostly in iok not pok.

Ethnic kashmiri muslims who are 95%+ in iok are the ones who want an independant state for themselves while paharis in pok side with pakistan and dogras in iok side with india.

Terrorist anta lol konchem burra vaadi history nerchuko oorike telikunda cheppindhe cheppodhu.

em matladutunnav ra ..kodi brain laa unnave..hindu population was 20% in 1947 and is now 2.4%..what do you think happened to that 18%?? 

entha convenient gaa raasav raa - it hit breaking point and exodus happened anta..wow..full happies gaa illu, lands, properties vadilesi, akkadunna muslims ki ichesi vacharanukunnava..vallani oochakotha kosarraa badakov..

anduke antunna..you are more dangerous than the terrorists.. nuvvu turakodiva raa bayata?

[chittugaadu]

19 hours ago, Teluguredu said:

Cleansing is when population is displaced ,which didn't happen in kashmir nor did it happen in south india.the people there converted to islam ,there is no genetic difference between pandits and muslims in kashmir ,both are same people.

Cleansing would be something like indo-aryan invasion of west asia , north india and central asia,aboriginals and natives being displaced by whites.

Aryan Invasion theory is debunked multiple times... using genetic and DNA proofs ... it's a British / west propaganda.

All through out last 20k years... there are migrations happening and Indian sub continent is hot bed.

There is no invasion and genetically south and north indians share the same genes. The whole concept that white folks from central asia came and they pushed native indians to south (Dravidians) and they formed the north indians is baseless and false.

 

[Teluguredu]

1 hour ago, chittugaadu said:

Aryan Invasion theory is debunked multiple times... using genetic and DNA proofs ... it's a British / west propaganda.

All through out last 20k years... there are migrations happening and Indian sub continent is hot bed.

There is no invasion and genetically south and north indians share the same genes. The whole concept that white folks from central asia came and they pushed native indians to south (Dravidians) and they formed the north indians is baseless and false.

 

What ? Lol indo aryan invasion is debunked by whom? Palki sharma?

They do share some similar ancestry but north indians by large have significant amount of aryan ancestry while south indians don't.

[Teluguredu]

2 hours ago, summer27 said:

em matladutunnav ra ..kodi brain laa unnave..hindu population was 20% in 1947 and is now 2.4%..what do you think happened to that 18%?? 

entha convenient gaa raasav raa - it hit breaking point and exodus happened anta..wow..full happies gaa illu, lands, properties vadilesi, akkadunna muslims ki ichesi vacharanukunnava..vallani oochakotha kosarraa badakov..

anduke antunna..you are more dangerous than the terrorists.. nuvvu turakodiva raa bayata?

20% hindu population is in combined jammu and kashmir , kashmir was 90% muslim since centuries ,you have no knowledge about anything ,stop replying to me with WhatsApp history.

When did I support muslims kicking our pandits ? I just told what happened.

 

[mazar]

26 minutes ago, Teluguredu said:

20% hindu population is in combined jammu and kashmir , kashmir was 90% muslim since centuries ,you have no knowledge about anything ,stop replying to me with WhatsApp history.

When did I support muslims kicking our pandits ? I just told what happened.

 

wrong facts.....its not his but your info is from whatsapp group of your like minded diseased people....stop believing in whatever they forward....

kashmir was not 90% turk since centuries (what a joke)...before the tribal invasion in 1947 the scenario was way different.....places around bar@mullah was once hindu dominated many fled after 1947 same case with poonch rajouri....POK had many hindu sikh areas until 1947 when pak occupied it and filled it with mirpuris and punjabis...

[Teluguredu]

3 hours ago, mazar said:

wrong facts.....its not his but your info is from whatsapp group of your like minded diseased people....stop believing in whatever they forward....

kashmir was not 90% turk since centuries (what a joke)...before the tribal invasion in 1947 the scenario was way different.....places around bar@mullah was once hindu dominated many fled after 1947 same case with poonch rajouri....POK had many hindu sikh areas until 1947 when pak occupied it and filled it with mirpuris and punjabis...

Are you dumb or you can't read?

Poonch,rajpuri arent even in kashmir ,read all the comments I wrote before ,I clearly told 20% hindu population is in combined j&k state ,kashmir valley was a complete muslim majority for centuries,jammu has nothing to do with kashmir.

Pok doesn't really have many ethnic kashmiris most of them are paharis that's the reason they don't ask for independence.ethnic kashmiris live in valley region in iok.its useless to talk about ajk or Gilgit baltistan when talking about kashmir.

The only hindus in kashmir valley are kashmiri pandits (whose population never crossed 5%) and a very few negligible amount of dogras.

[mazar]

4 hours ago, Teluguredu said:

Are you dumb or you can't read?

Poonch,rajpuri arent even in kashmir ,read all the comments I wrote before ,I clearly told 20% hindu population is in combined j&k state ,kashmir valley was a complete muslim majority for centuries,jammu has nothing to do with kashmir.

Pok doesn't really have many ethnic kashmiris most of them are paharis that's the reason they don't ask for independence.ethnic kashmiris live in valley region in iok.its useless to talk about ajk or Gilgit baltistan when talking about kashmir.

The only hindus in kashmir valley are kashmiri pandits (whose population never crossed 5%) and a very few negligible amount of dogras.

ok so its iok and pak occupied muzaffarabad and mirpur is ajk?? I get your point of view. anyways india will continue to occupy it and you cant do anything abt it LOL so enjoy 

[summer27]

6 hours ago, Teluguredu said:

Are you dumb or you can't read?

Poonch,rajpuri arent even in kashmir ,read all the comments I wrote before ,I clearly told 20% hindu population is in combined j&k state ,kashmir valley was a complete muslim majority for centuries,jammu has nothing to do with kashmir.

Pok doesn't really have many ethnic kashmiris most of them are paharis that's the reason they don't ask for independence.ethnic kashmiris live in valley region in iok.its useless to talk about ajk or Gilgit baltistan when talking about kashmir.

The only hindus in kashmir valley are kashmiri pandits (whose population never crossed 5%) and a very few negligible amount of dogras.

lets go with your numbers for a min here..does that justify the masaccare of these 5% minorities? and you call it a breaking point?? can the same logic be applied elsewhere in India?

[Teluguredu]

9 hours ago, mazar said:

ok so its iok and pak occupied muzaffarabad and mirpur is ajk?? I get your point of view. anyways india will continue to occupy it and you cant do anything abt it LOL so enjoy 

I used ajk because ajk is different from GB although both come under pok ,i also mentioned pok as a whole but of course your slave mindset doesn't have the brain to go off script.

[Teluguredu]

6 hours ago, summer27 said:

lets go with your numbers for a min here..does that justify the masaccare of these 5% minorities? and you call it a breaking point?? can the same logic be applied elsewhere in India?

When did I ever say it's the best decision to kick them out?.

I just told what happened.

It's not because they are hindus that they were killed ,although many kashmiri muslims don't like them cause of dogra rule but the real reason is because they didn't want an independant kashmir and were supporting india.