DonnyStrumpet Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 Why are we giving protection to Sheikh Haseena. She is a very unpopular leader. Her govt was toppled by locales. What benefit do we get for protecting a fugitive? Other than pissing off the mullah Bangladeshis. It appears like we are creating another enemy in our backyard. Can some one logically justify this move by our Govt? @Mancode Quote
Android_Halwa Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 Political asylum….Her father was the closest ally of India-Bangla. Politically it’s very important to have her and her ideologue on our side. She is ousted now but Awami league is still a force and has life left. When normaly restores and interim govt paves way for a democratically elected govt, This step will play a crucial role. 2 Quote
Mancode Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 21 minutes ago, DonnyStrumpet said: Why are we giving protection to Sheikh Haseena. She is a very unpopular leader. Her govt was toppled by locales. What benefit do we get for protecting a fugitive? Other than pissing off the mullah Bangladeshis. It’s like creating another enemy in our backyard.   Can some one logically justify this move by our Govt? @Mancode What choice you have? If india doesn't give asyulum China may give Sri Lanka may give Instead of khaleda zia party and Mohammed Yunus ( two radical Islamists) ,shiekh Hasina is better for Hindus in Bangladesh Khaleda zia ruling Apudu Hindus are killed in large numbers Quote
DonnyStrumpet Posted May 21 Author Report Posted May 21 6 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said: Political asylum….Her father was the closest ally of India-Bangla. Politically it’s very important to have her and her ideologue on our side. She is ousted now but Awami league is still a force and has life left. When normaly restores and interim govt paves way for a democratically elected govt, This step will play a crucial role. Is this move worth it? If she is so unpopular why should we risk facing the wrath of local Bangladeshis. It feels like we are putting too much stock on her political comeback. What if it doesn’t transpire that way. Quote
Sam480 Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 23 minutes ago, DonnyStrumpet said: Why are we giving protection to Sheikh Haseena. She is a very unpopular leader. Her govt was toppled by locales. What benefit do we get for protecting a fugitive? Other than pissing off the mullah Bangladeshis. It’s like creating another enemy in our backyard.   Can some one logically justify this move by our Govt? @Mancode The current Govt in Bangladesh is Pro-china and Pro-pak , Even if India decides to send her to Bangladesh it won't help politically. But aiding her right now might help in the long run. Quote
Mancode Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 6 minutes ago, DonnyStrumpet said: Is this move worth it? If she is so unpopular why should we risk facing the wrath of local Bangladeshis. It feels like we are putting too much stock on her political comeback. What if it doesn’t transpire that way. She is gonna comeback for sure She survived 4 assaisination attempts . And Bangladesh can't be run by Mohammad Yunus as froxy of opposition People would turn back on him in sometime Quote
DonnyStrumpet Posted May 21 Author Report Posted May 21 1 minute ago, Sam480 said: The current Govt in Bangladesh is Pro-china and Pro-pak , Even if India decides to send her to Bangladesh it won't help politically. But aiding her right now might help in the long run. Just now, Mancode said: She is gonna comeback for sure She survived 4 assaisination attempts . And Bangladesh can't be run by Mohammad Yunus as ***** of opposition People would turn back on him in sometime Hopefully this work out as planned. Otherwise it will be an another poisonous snake in our backyard aka Bangladesh. Unlike pakis, these mfs are financially as well as population wise doing good. Slowly, China will equip them with missles and possible nukes if needed. Quote
Mancode Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 2 minutes ago, DonnyStrumpet said: Hopefully this work out as planned. Otherwise it will be an another poisonous snake in our backyard aka Bangladesh. Unlike pakis, these mfs are financially as well as population wise doing good. Slowly, China will equip them with missles and possible nukes if needed. Kanglus are nothing ,trust me If india wants to invade them ,it won't take 3 days to merge into india Quote
futureofandhra Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 7 minutes ago, Sam480 said: The current Govt in Bangladesh is Pro-china and Pro-pak , Even if India decides to send her to Bangladesh it won't help politically. But aiding her right now might help in the long run. i thought pro us also Quote
futureofandhra Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 Just now, Mancode said: Kanglus are nothing ,trust me If india wants to invade them ,it won't take 3 days to merge into india pak n bangla have china suupport Quote
Mancode Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 1 minute ago, futureofandhra said: pak n bangla have china suupport Bokkalo support Chinkis are playing cat and mouse with modi Direct war antha scene ledu Chinkis ni nammukoni pakis & bangladesg won't come to war with india Quote
Android_Halwa Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 8 minutes ago, DonnyStrumpet said: Is this move worth it? If she is so unpopular why should we risk facing the wrath of local Bangladeshis. It feels like we are putting too much stock on her political comeback. What if it doesn’t transpire that way. There is nothing like popular/unpopular. Its worth. We cannot directly involve ourself within the internal matters of Bangladesh and need to have a partner and Awami is the partner. Shuffle is happening in Bangla and existing supporters may find shelter in other camps but when things settle down, these are the same voices we will need then… Nawaf Sharif was ousted and expelled, from most popular to disgrace, He still has command over Pakistan Politics. This is nothing new for islamic republics. Quote
futureofandhra Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 1 minute ago, Mancode said: Bokkalo support Chinkis are playing cat and mouse with modi Direct war antha scene ledu Chinkis ni nammukoni pakis & bangladesg won't come to war with india am talkin about if india goes offensive not the other way arround andhukey ga ladakh lo occupying land so easily Quote
Sam480 Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 12 minutes ago, futureofandhra said: i thought pro us also US is always Pro-US Quote
CanadianMalodu Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 1 hour ago, DonnyStrumpet said: Why are we giving protection to Sheikh Haseena. She is a very unpopular leader. Her govt was toppled by locales. What benefit do we get for protecting a fugitive? Other than pissing off the mullah Bangladeshis. It’s like creating another enemy in our backyard.   Can some one logically justify this move by our Govt? @Mancode I think India should simply annex Bangladesh. It has claim to the land. It's easier to deal with Islamic extremism and Hindu genocide when Bangladesh becomes a part of India. India gets the tax revenue and infrastructure and expand the market and access to resources. People like Hassina will be of better use then. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.