Promotions at workplace shouldn't be allowed for childless people by the government?

[SaradaChinnodu]

1 minute ago, krishnaaa said:

Not everything should be based on money. They will depend on other's kids once they get old though.

try saying this to all NRI parents living now in India. Inka next gen gurinchi cheppanavasaram ledu

 

[krishnaaa]

1 minute ago, 11_MohanReddy said:

Why are you making a choice that you will regret? Peer pressure is the only reason people have kids. Either that or a you didn't pull at the right time. 

Read my post again

[11_MohanReddy]

1 minute ago, krishnaaa said:

Read my post again

 

[krishnaaa]

3 minutes ago, SaradaChinnodu said:

try saying this to all NRI parents living now in India. Inka next gen gurinchi cheppanavasaram ledu

 

Sorry. Didn't get you.

Can you please elaborate.

[SaradaChinnodu]

30 minutes ago, krishnaaa said:

Sorry. Didn't get you.

bro, I mean to say that relying on children during old age is not universally true. It's like winning a lottery and whats written in their fate. As you can see most of the NRI parents are left behind in India some with and others without financial support. So, having kids should be personal choice and should not be driven based on assumption that it would secure their old age as there is no guarantee..

 

[11_MohanReddy]

2 minutes ago, krishnaaa said:

Sorry. Didn't get you.

Can you please elaborate.

This is what he means. 

 

6 minutes ago, 11_MohanReddy said:

If that is the reason you are having kids, better to buy healthcare insurance.

 

[krishnaaa]

Just now, SaradaChinnodu said:

bro, I mean to say that relying on children during old age is not universally true. It's like a lottery and whats in their fate. As you can see most of the NRI parents are left behind in India some with and others without financial support. So, having kids should be personal choice and should be driven based on security on old age as there is not guarantee..anyways, I dont want to derail this thread anymore...

 

They are dependant on younger caretakers who are others' kids. So, having kids is still a societal need.

Also having young generation is good for the nation. Look at US for example, due to average ge being more, many will vote for whoever extends senior benefits. They won't care if the country goes bankrupt. Innovation would stall without young immigrants.

[11_MohanReddy]

Just now, krishnaaa said:

They are dependant on younger caretakers who are others' kids. So, having kids is still a societal need.

Also having young generation is good for the nation. Look at US for example, due to average ge being more, many will vote for whoever extends senior benefits. They won't care if the country goes bankrupt. Innovation would stall without young immigrants.

1. Peer pressure. 

2. Why should I care what happens to the future of humankind?

[krishnaaa]

7 minutes ago, 11_MohanReddy said:

1. Peer pressure. 

2. Why should I care what happens to the future of humankind?

Societal responsibility.

People who want to live a free life can live outside of society. Many do so and are very happy.

Its counterproductive to go against society and still continue to consume its resources. They should atleast adopt.

Many people with kids also don't have societal responsibility. For example, they still drive around in expensive gas guzzling cars eventhough millions are dieing every year due to pollution but that's a separate topic.

[11_MohanReddy]

1 minute ago, krishnaaa said:

Societal responsibility.

People who want to live a free life can live outside of society. Many do so and are very happy.

Its counterproductive to go against society and still continue to consume its resources. They should atleast adopt.

Many people with kids also don't have societal responsibility. For example, they still drive around in expensive gas guzzling cars.

If you have any societal responsibility, you will reduce the carbon footprint. 

Each kid increases a family's carbon footprint, adding a substantial amount of carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere. One study estimated that in the U.S., having one child adds approximately 9,441 tons of CO2 to the carbon legacy of each parent, according to Scripps News. This equates to more than five times a person's own lifetime emissions. 

[allbakara]

Mee company lo ee proposal petti outcome ento cheppu, then we can take it further 

[krishnaaa]

Just now, allbakara said:

Mee company lo ee proposal petti outcome ento cheppu, then we can take it further 

It has to be taken up by all companies by force. They won't do it voluntarily.

[allbakara]

1 minute ago, 11_MohanReddy said:

If you have any societal responsibility, you will reduce the carbon footprint. 

Each kid increases a family's carbon footprint, adding a substantial amount of carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere. One study estimated that in the U.S., having one child adds approximately 9,441 tons of CO2 to the carbon legacy of each parent, according to Scripps News. This equates to more than five times a person's own lifetime emissions. 

Evadu bro ee panikimalina research chesina edhava, what is the conclusion - driving gas car is better than having kid?

[11_MohanReddy]

Just now, allbakara said:

Evadu bro ee panikimalina research chesina edhava, what is the conclusion - driving gas car is better than having kid?

Societal responsibility gurunchi vaage vadiki cheptunna

[krishnaaa]

2 minutes ago, 11_MohanReddy said:

If you have any societal responsibility, you will reduce the carbon footprint. 

Each kid increases a family's carbon footprint, adding a substantial amount of carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere. One study estimated that in the U.S., having one child adds approximately 9,441 tons of CO2 to the carbon legacy of each parent, according to Scripps News. This equates to more than five times a person's own lifetime emissions. 

Without humans, all life would stop existing as only humans have the capability to expand consciousness.

And humans can become carbon neutral or even reverse.