Trump Tariffs coming back (TRUMP WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING) aug1st

[Mancode]

90 days 90 countries tho deal anadu

Only 3 countries tho deals done as of now , but TRUMP WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING , all the economists/experts on CNN, MSNBC,ABC, Bloomberg, and all MSM said Trump won't achieve anything with tariffs ,but china made a deal ..

@Bendapudi_english I think this would cost him in midterms ,but if it's not done ,US trade deficit will increase,so he is reforming the system,which was in place for past 20-25 yrs, I think India should impose tariffs on Pakistan 

"As of July 7, 2025, no additional countries have finalized tariff agreements with the Trump administration beyond the United Kingdom, Vietnam, and China, but India, Japan, and Canada are in the final stages of negotiations.

Positive Outcomes After Trump’s Tariffs (5 Identified):

1. Job Creation in Specific Industries: Tariffs on steel and aluminum created over 4,000 new American jobs, with U.S. steel production increasing by 1.9%.
2. Reduced Trade Deficits: The U.S.-China trade deficit decreased from $420 billion to $270 billion after tariffs were imposed on Chinese goods, with Chinese exports to the U.S. falling by 25%.
3. Reshoring of Manufacturing: Companies like Hyundai, Audi, Porsche, Bosch, Continental, and Samsung are planning or actively relocating production to the U.S. to avoid tariffs, boosting domestic manufacturing.
4. Trade Leverage and Agreements: Tariffs led to successful negotiations with countries like the United Kingdom, Vietnam, and China, with Vietnam opening its markets to U.S. goods at 0% tariffs, boosting U.S. exports.
5. National Security and Border Control: Tariffs on Mexico and Canada prompted Mexico to deploy 10,000 troops to curb fentanyl flow, and resolved national security concerns with Colombia regarding migration and drug trafficking.

Cons of Trump’s Tariffs (7 Identified):

1. Increased Consumer Prices: Tariffs are expected to raise prices for goods like electronics, groceries, and vehicles, costing U.S. households an estimated $1,200-$5,200 annually.
2. Economic Slowdown: Tariffs are projected to reduce U.S. GDP by 0.8%-8% and may trigger a mild recession, with global economic growth also affected (e.g., China GDP down 0.68%, EU down 0.11%).
3. Job Losses in Some Sectors: While some industries gained jobs, others, like manufacturing and agriculture, faced losses due to higher input costs and reduced export demand from retaliatory tariffs.
4. Retaliatory Tariffs: Countries like China (34% tariffs), Canada, and Mexico imposed retaliatory tariffs, harming U.S. exporters and increasing costs for American manufacturers.
5. Supply Chain Disruptions: Tariffs disrupted global supply chains, raising costs for industries like automotive, technology, and retail, and hindering EV production due to higher component costs.
6. Market Volatility: Tariff announcements caused significant stock market swings, reduced investment, and increased economic uncertainty, potentially impacting pensions and jobs.
7. Inflationary Pressure: Tariffs are expected to increase inflation (e.g., PCE price inflation to 2.7%-3.1% in 2025), complicating Federal Reserve efforts to manage inflation and potentially raising borrowing costs. -Grok Ai

 

[Mancode]

 

 letters he is sending to country heads

 

[Pavanonline]

So deal kudirithe dappu, deal kudarakapoyina dappu 😁, he can never be wrong with you ppl.

China di deal emundi na Moham, it'll increase prices and inflation. It's a self goal as fed stopped reducing interest rates because of it. Steel industry lo vache jobs kante steel prices increase valla poye jobs will be 10 fold. Trade deficit is a meaningless thing that only Trump cares about. GDP is more important and has gone down 4% which is trillions in value 😂. Ee stupidity ni venakesukoche mental gallani treatment ki pampali 

[Coconut]

TACO

[paaparao]

not sure ekkadi nundi copy kottavo content. 

but on ground jobs creation inka jaragaledu. jobs levu. unemployment super high undi. Trump needs to immediately plan strategy to increase domestic jobs in short term though trade deals might improve jobs and economy in long term. 
it seems like Trump made mistake trusting blindly scott bessent. Trump should have listened to Elon musk on economy. 

Naakaithe Republicans need to intervene now and control Trump on economy. strongly need short term plan. 

[vetri_psyconandamuri]

1 hour ago, Pavanonline said:

So deal kudirithe dappu, deal kudarakapoyina dappu 😁, he can never be wrong with you ppl.

China di deal emundi na Moham, it'll increase prices and inflation. It's a self goal as fed stopped reducing interest rates because of it. Steel industry lo vache jobs kante steel prices increase valla poye jobs will be 10 fold. Trade deficit is a meaningless thing that only Trump cares about. GDP is more important and has gone down 4% which is trillions in value 😂. Ee stupidity ni venakesukoche mental gallani treatment ki pampali 

@Mancodesaying "CBN gadu burp cheste elevations iche pulkas chepali"

 

[Pavanonline]

1 hour ago, vetri_psyconandamuri said:

@Mancodesaying "CBN gadu burp cheste elevations iche pulkas chepali"

 

arei neeku bikini pics chusina bul bul balayya gurtostunadu, ekkadina chupinchuko kojja ga

usko usko

[Mancode]

4 hours ago, Pavanonline said:

So deal kudirithe dappu, deal kudarakapoyina dappu 😁, he can never be wrong with you ppl.

China di deal emundi na Moham, it'll increase prices and inflation. It's a self goal as fed stopped reducing interest rates because of it. Steel industry lo vache jobs kante steel prices increase valla poye jobs will be 10 fold. Trade deficit is a meaningless thing that only Trump cares about. GDP is more important and has gone down 4% which is trillions in value 😂. Ee stupidity ni venakesukoche mental gallani treatment ki pampali 

It's not only trade deficit ,which was already cut into half, it was about national security 

The reciprocal tariffs is my fav thing ,you charge us ,we charge you too ,it's gonna create more jobs the day US made deals and open up markets for US products in those nations

And also most of the times ,the tariffs are eaten by US importers instead of passing them to consumers 

Trump was 5 th prez to use Tariffs ,so this is not a complete new concept

 

 

[Mancode]

2 hours ago, vetri_psyconandamuri said:

@Mancodesaying "CBN gadu burp cheste elevations iche pulkas chepali"

 

Well said , thanks 

Total access to US products in those markets 

[vetri_psyconandamuri]

51 minutes ago, Pavanonline said:

arei neeku bikini pics chusina bul bul balayya gurtostunadu, ekkadina chupinchuko kojja ga

usko usko

Why do you get worked up like @Konebhar6?

Relax

Take a deep breath

And eat mirchi bajji 

[Mancode]

2 hours ago, paaparao said:

not sure ekkadi nundi copy kottavo content. 

but on ground jobs creation inka jaragaledu. jobs levu. unemployment super high undi. Trump needs to immediately plan strategy to increase domestic jobs in short term though trade deals might improve jobs and economy in long term. 
it seems like Trump made mistake trusting blindly scott bessent. Trump should have listened to Elon musk on economy. 

Naakaithe Republicans need to intervene now and control Trump on economy. strongly need short term plan. 

GRok AI

4 prez used tariffs before ,tariffs are not scott bessent idea it was Peter navarro idea , peter navarro is a genius 

4 hours ago, Pavanonline said:

So deal kudirithe dappu, deal kudarakapoyina dappu 😁, he can never be wrong with you ppl.

China di deal emundi na Moham, it'll increase prices and inflation. It's a self goal as fed stopped reducing interest rates because of it. Steel industry lo vache jobs kante steel prices increase valla poye jobs will be 10 fold. Trade deficit is a meaningless thing that only Trump cares about. GDP is more important and has gone down 4% which is trillions in value 😂. Ee stupidity ni venakesukoche mental gallani treatment ki pampali 

 

Jerome powell is a idiot ,read this article by Peter navarro 

 

 

 

This is another one explaing his bias ,powell cut rates when inflation was 2.4 in biden time ,but same trump time lo 2.4 lo unte he played games for first 4 months 

Jay powell is biased

June 17, 2025

Jerome Powell: A political player

By Perry V.Kalaijan

 

Jerome Powell has been a political player for years and his less than stellar record as Fed chair is evidence of his gamesmanship.

 

 

 

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) was at 1.4% when Joe Biden took office as president in January 2021. It then spiked, crossing over the long-standing maximum target of 2.0% to rise to 2.6% in March 2021. The CPI continued its precipitous rise until peaking at 9.1% in June 2022. The Biden administration called inflation “transitory” during this rising period and blamed it on the pandemic, supply chain disruptions, the Ukraine war, corporate greed, and anything else they could conjure up rather than the fact that the main cause was excessive spending by Biden and the Democrats. Powell, wanting to be renominated as Fed chair and knowing that Biden wanted interest rates to remain low to further stimulate an already overheated economy, parroted the propaganda-based transitory position. This resulted in the Federal Funds Rate (FFR) not being increased to any significant degree by the Fed until June 2022, more than a year after the CPI crossed the maximum 2.0% target in March 2021. Why did Powell during this critical period fall in line with the position that inflation was transitory, take little to no action with respect to the FFR, and ignore the obvious cause of excessive spending as the primary reason for the rise in the CPI? Simple. Powell was playing politics and wanted Biden’s support to secure him a second term as Fed chair.

Showing Powell’s political bias toward the Democratic party and against Donald Trump in the leadup to the November 2024 election, the FFR was decreased by 0.5% in September 2024 in an attempt to energize the economy and help Kamala Harris. Notice that the rate decrease was a full 0.5% and not the more conservative position of 0.25% that may have been anticipated. In addition, the CPI was at 2.4% in September 2024, still well above the desired 2.0% maximum target. The CPI increased to 2.6% in October 2024, 2.7% in November 2024, 2.9% in December 2024 and 3.0% in January 2025 when Trump took office, supporting the position that the Fed had not defeated the inflation existing under the Biden economy.

After the election, the Fed decreased the FFR by an additional 0.25% in November 2024 and followed that with another 0.25% in December of 2024, both of which I believe were done as cover for their politically motivated and ill-advised FFR cut prior to the election. It is clear that the Fed did not have inflation under control. Fortunately, the CPI fell to 2.8% in February 2025, continued its downward trend to 2.4% in March 2025, and fell further to 2.3% in April 2025 (before a less than expected and slight uptick to 2.4% in May 2025, which some might attribute in part to Trump’s imposition of tariffs to fight trade imbalances), due in no part to the actions of the Powell-led Fed, but interestingly aligning perfectly with Trump’s ascension to the presidency and the start of the implementation of his policies. Powell and the Fed should not have been adjusting the FFR in the runup to the election, as this made it look like the Fed was trying to impact the election. In addition, it being clear that inflation was still a problem, Powell and the Fed should have taken no action until after the election. This would have allowed the Fed to keep its powder dry in terms of the FFR and given them greater latitude to address the economy as impacted by the actions of Trump in 2025.

To make matters worse for Trump, Powell’s term as Fed chair does not end until May 15, 2026, and it is debatable whether Trump as president has the legal authority to remove Powell from his post prior to the end of his term as head of the Fed. This means that Powell will be able to take positions contrary to those of Trump well into the second year of his presidency, a period in which the Republicans control the House and Senate, and are well positioned to take significant actions.

 

As Trump addresses the economy through the imposition of tariffs, reduced regulations, and his hoped-for tax reforms, all areas in which he has some degree of control, it is important that the Fed, an independent body, takes actions that are in concert.

I believe that the politically motivated Powell will continue to be a thorn in the side of Trump and the Republicans, as well as working against the best interests of the country.

 

 

 

In summation, we must consider the facts and not be fooled by the fiction.

Perry V. Kalajian is an attorney, consultant, analyst, and national television personality.

[Pavanonline]

7 hours ago, Mancode said:

It's not only trade deficit ,which was already cut into half, it was about national security 

The reciprocal tariffs is my fav thing ,you charge us ,we charge you too ,it's gonna create more jobs the day US made deals and open up markets for US products in those nations

And also most of the times ,the tariffs are eaten by US importers instead of passing them to consumers 

Trump was 5 th prez to use Tariffs ,so this is not a complete new concept

 

 

Meeku meeru tweets veskotam kadu, gdp fell from 3.5 to negative, you continue dappu 😁. Comparing tarrifs from 1800s 🫡

[paaparao]

7 hours ago, Mancode said:

GRok AI

4 prez used tariffs before ,tariffs are not scott bessent idea it was Peter navarro idea , peter navarro is a genius 

tariffs gurunchi kaadu. Economy lo more jobs create cheyadaniki Musk advises ichadu. avi follow avvaledu trump admin. 

[shaktimaan]

pichodi chethilo raayi

[yemdoing]

10 hours ago, Mancode said:

It's not only trade deficit ,which was already cut into half, it was about national security 

The reciprocal tariffs is my fav thing ,you charge us ,we charge you too ,it's gonna create more jobs the day US made deals and open up markets for US products in those nations

And also most of the times ,the tariffs are eaten by US importers instead of passing them to consumers 

Trump was 5 th prez to use Tariffs ,so this is not a complete new concept

 

 

peter is thatha chamcha... and people should trust his POV ?