Zero sympathy for people like this

[Bag]

5 hours ago, vetri_psyconandamuri said:

The lorry stopping language 

 

That insecurity 

 

Scared to reply in @Jatka Bandi Id

 

As usual getting bang banged by everyone 

 

Story of the last 15 years

 

If bang bang increases them runnaway from db

 

Come back and start fake narratives

anniya @ARYA lo reply iyyochu ga 

24hrs eedane padi untunava baarya tommy tho poyindani ayyo ayyoyo

nuvu reply ichina time midnight anniya asalu padukunnava? health padu avutundi anniya

beer lu taagutu fake ids create cheukuni em peekutav anniya

akkada tommy rapa rapa anta nuvu chudu gif lo entha worst ga unnav, tommy nekante potti ga unnadu but baarya ni mattuku rapa rapa vayistunadu

15years ga dm lu chustu lady ids ni blackmail chestu bollantha sampadinchav ani db kodai kusutundi anniyo

[Jatka Bandi]

10 hours ago, vetri_psyconandamuri said:

Scammer who collects Db members personal info 

And tries to blackmail

 

Deserves nothing but bang bajg which you get regulsrly from db seniors

db senior members and your elevations to them.. get an orgasm with them.. 

[Tyrannosauraus_Rex]

15 hours ago, 7691 said:

Abba tammudu deenikey itla avuthey etla.

 

yemen nurse from india ani google search cheyyi. Our govt is wasting so much money and resources to save a murderer from being executed.

andukey last time black shirts esukunna tammullu

Two absolutely completely different scenarios. The difference between Yemen and the US is the words "due process". Perhaps the most critical 2 words in law.

Pacchiga cheppali antey - one is a third world country wherein there are doubts if legal due process is followed and one is the US - and for all its imperfections - you can still trust that the accused are given due process. Ee video is patently clear that the police are interviewing him under regular interrogation conditions. The fact that the interrogation itself is videotaped is a major step up.

 

The idea is to first establish the crime has indeed happened and if it did - were there any mitigating circumstances - was he influenced or coerced into doing this under duress and a whole bunch of other factors. All these will come to light in a country/democracy that follows "due process" - which is why you get to see these video evidence of an accused being interviewed in the USA - not being bashed to pulp by police as what happens in third world countries. 

Once torture is applied or physical pain is employed - even innocent people will admit to crimes that they have not committed because most regular people cannot bear physical pain or senseless thrashing by police under the guise of police interrogation (the disgusting phrase of 3rd degree in India for example).

Yemen lo - how do we know that the Indian nurse had due process? The Indian government had to be involved. Also one is a white collar crime and Yemen case lo it is a death sentence. If someone is wrongly imprisoned for a few months or years and then released - at least pranalatho bayataki ravocchu. Death sentence once it is carried out - there is no salvaging the situation. So for this reason alone the Yemen nurse case and this case are in completely two different legal galaxies.

It needs to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime was committed - which is why most countries have the well-established legal precedent of "innocent until proven guilty". 

 

Even this Indian guy is innocent until proven guilty - but most of the times - it is fairly obvious who did the crime and for what reasons. And with this Patel guy - I have seen enough (from the time he got arrested on video while committing the crime) to determine that he has unfortunately clearly participated in this crime out of his own volition - thus no sympathy.

[7691]

5 hours ago, Tyrannosauraus_Rex said:

Two absolutely completely different scenarios. The difference between Yemen and the US is the words "due process". Perhaps the most critical 2 words in law.

Pacchiga cheppali antey - one is a third world country wherein there are doubts if legal due process is followed and one is the US - and for all its imperfections - you can still trust that the accused are given due process. Ee video is patently clear that the police are interviewing him under regular interrogation conditions. The fact that the interrogation itself is videotaped is a major step up.

 

The idea is to first establish the crime has indeed happened and if it did - were there any mitigating circumstances - was he influenced or coerced into doing this under duress and a whole bunch of other factors. All these will come to light in a country/democracy that follows "due process" - which is why you get to see these video evidence of an accused being interviewed in the USA - not being bashed to pulp by police as what happens in third world countries. 

Once torture is applied or physical pain is employed - even innocent people will admit to crimes that they have not committed because most regular people cannot bear physical pain or senseless thrashing by police under the guise of police interrogation (the disgusting phrase of 3rd degree in India for example).

Yemen lo - how do we know that the Indian nurse had due process? The Indian government had to be involved. Also one is a white collar crime and Yemen case lo it is a death sentence. If someone is wrongly imprisoned for a few months or years and then released - at least pranalatho bayataki ravocchu. Death sentence once it is carried out - there is no salvaging the situation. So for this reason alone the Yemen nurse case and this case are in completely two different legal galaxies.

It needs to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime was committed - which is why most countries have the well-established legal precedent of "innocent until proven guilty". 

 

Even this Indian guy is innocent until proven guilty - but most of the times - it is fairly obvious who did the crime and for what reasons. And with this Patel guy - I have seen enough (from the time he got arrested on video while committing the crime) to determine that he has unfortunately clearly participated in this crime out of his own volition - thus no sympathy.

The lady accepted killing the victim accidentally with overdose of medication.  The incident happened almost a decade back. What’s disturbing about that murder is that she decided to cut the deadbody of victim into parts and dispose it. Now the victims family rejected blood money. 

[TeluguTexas]

5 hours ago, 7691 said:

The lady accepted killing the victim accidentally with overdose of medication.  The incident happened almost a decade back. What’s disturbing about that murder is that she decided to cut the deadbody of victim into parts and dispose it. Now the victims family rejected blood money. 

Vadu eme ni chala mosam chesi sathiyinchadu ani ala chesindhi anta

idi correct wrong ani chala mandhiki confusion vundi very strange case!!