Racism (jatyahankaram) is a part of Indian civilization mentioned in Mahabharatam

[11MohanRedddy]

 

Before Sambar Land representatives come and claim that it is not, Mahabharatam talks about jatyahankaram. If there is an answer to your problem, you will find it in Mahabharatam. 

[Teluguredu]

Mahabharatam has nothing to do with non-indo-aryans.

[vorey_peteruuu]

9 minutes ago, 11MohanRedddy said:

 

Before Sambar Land representatives come and claim that it is not, Mahabharatam talks about jatyahankaram. If there is an answer to your problem, you will find it in Mahabharatam. 

I am forever grateful to my african ancestors who didn’t know what mahabharatam was.

[11MohanRedddy]

36 minutes ago, Teluguredu said:

Mahabharatam has nothing to do with non-indo-aryans.

I don't even know what that is...but Aryan invasion theory has been debunked over and over. I cannot argue stupid. 

[11MohanRedddy]

36 minutes ago, vorey_peteruuu said:

I am forever grateful to my african ancestors who didn’t know what mahabharatam was.

If you had African ancestors, they were reptiles. 

[Teluguredu]

Just now, 11MohanRedddy said:

I don't even know what that is...but Aryan invasion theory has been debunked over and over. I cannot argue stupid. 

It has never been debunked ,unless of course if you are referring to low iq grifter youtubers and podcasters then india is a 10000 year old idea lol.

[Android_Halwa]

Discrimination is a human quality….a mentality which is embedded by default.

[balancer]

 

ohoo alagaaa

noted

[11MohanRedddy]

5 hours ago, Teluguredu said:

It has never been debunked ,unless of course if you are referring to low iq grifter youtubers and podcasters then india is a 10000 year old idea lol.

The idea of a large-scale "Aryan invasion" of India has been largely debunked by modern scholarship, though the concept of migrations of Indo-Aryan speakers into the Indian subcontinent remains. The original "Aryan Invasion Theory," which posited a violent conquest and displacement of the Indus Valley Civilization by nomadic Aryan tribes, is not supported by archeological and genetic evidence. Instead, scholars now favor a model of gradual Indo-Aryan migrations and cultural exchange, likely beginning around 1500 BCE. 

[Teluguredu]

24 minutes ago, 11MohanRedddy said:

The idea of a large-scale "Aryan invasion" of India has been largely debunked by modern scholarship, though the concept of migrations of Indo-Aryan speakers into the Indian subcontinent remains. The original "Aryan Invasion Theory," which posited a violent conquest and displacement of the Indus Valley Civilization by nomadic Aryan tribes, is not supported by archeological and genetic evidence. Instead, scholars now favor a model of gradual Indo-Aryan migrations and cultural exchange, likely beginning around 1500 BCE. 

Okay how does it even matter if it's invasion or migration lol fact is we don't have anything to do with their culture.

[11MohanRedddy]

2 hours ago, Teluguredu said:

Okay how does it even matter if it's invasion or migration lol fact is we don't have anything to do with their culture.

Who are "we"?

[chittugaadu]

There may be trade. But there is NO indo aryan invasion or migration. Several recent studies showed that folks in northern belt of India and souther part share same haplo group in DNA test. There is no aryan pushing the indigenous Dravidian population to south.  All this aryan and Dravidian is max muller made up . 
if someone want to still use it for divide in 21st century, dandam saami

[Redarya]

14 hours ago, Android_Halwa said:

Discrimination is a human quality….a mentality which is embedded by default.

No discrimination in langa land ani @MyLeakHawla tolded