Popular Post Coconut Posted July 31 Popular Post Report Posted July 31 https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70869858/1/kancharla-v-federal-national-mortgage-association/ 3 Quote
american_desi Posted July 31 Report Posted July 31 24 minutes ago, Coconut said: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70869858/1/kancharla-v-federal-national-mortgage-association/ Matter 2 mukkallo Cheppu tammudu 1 Quote
Coconut Posted July 31 Author Report Posted July 31 10 minutes ago, american_desi said: Matter 2 mukkallo Cheppu tammudu 6. On April 2, 2025, Plaintiffs, who were all employees of Defendant, jointly and severally received an email from Fannie Mae Human Resources (HR) directing them not to come into the office, but to instead attend a Microsoft Teams call at 10 am on April 3, 2025. 7. Plaintiffs joined the Teams call along with what they believe were at least 80 other people. 26 Case 1:25-cv-02346 Document 1 Filed 07/21/25 Page 27 of 30 8. Plaintiffs, along with the other members of the Microsoft Teams call, were all told at the same time that they were all being terminated for cause for violating Fannie Mae’s Charitable Giving program for fraud. 9. No explanation was given, to individuals or to the group, and everyone on the call was identically and simultaneously terminated immediately. 10. Plaintiffs have since learned that each person on the call was of Indian national origin. Additionally, almost everyone on the call spoke the Telugu language, which is a large ethnic population in India, and all but a handful were over the age of 40 and most over the age of 50. 11. Plaintiffs were not given, and still do not have, any indication of any violation of the Charitable Giving program. 12. In response to a request for reconsideration subsequently made by Plaintiffs, Fannie Mae said that Plaintiffs had made gifts that they knew or should have known violated their policy, or that they knew that other employees had made gifts that Plaintiffs knew or should have known violated their policy. No explanation of individual conduct was ever given to any Plaintiff. 13. All of the charities involved advocated for programs supporting Indian national, ethnic and cultural programs, and only charities advocating for supporting Indian national, ethnic and cultural programs were identified. 14. To this day, Fannie Mae has still provided no evidence to support their claims of fraud against any of Plaintiffs, jointly or severally. 27 Case 1:25-cv-02346 Document 1 Filed 07/21/25 Page 28 of 30 V. EXHAUSTION OF FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 15. Plaintiffs in this matter each submitted a complaint to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The dates on which each plaintiff submitted their complaints are indicated in Section I.A. supra. 16. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued right to sue letters to each plaintiff. The dates these letters were received are also indicated in Section I.A. supra. 17. Since filing charges with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regarding the Defendant’s alleged discriminatory conduct, fewer than 60 days have elapsed. VI. BREACH OF CONTRACT 18. Paragraphs 1 through 16 inclusive are re-alleged herein. 19. Plaintiffs were all long-standing employees of Fannie Mae. 20. In cases of termination for convenience, employees of Fannie Mae are entitled under Company policy to administrative leave and to severance pay of at least two weeks per year of service, plus payout of other accrued incentives and benefits. 21. Plaintiffs were identically terminated for cause as a pretext to the unlawful termination on the basis of their Nationality, enabling for Fannie Mae to avoid these payments. VII. RELIEF 28 Case 1:25-cv-02346 Document 1 Filed 07/21/25 Page 29 of 30 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgement against the Defendant as follows: A. The Defendant be ordered to compensate the Plaintiffs for lost wages and reinstatement of employment; B. The Defendant be ordered to pay administrative leave and severance, including all benefits, to Plaintiffs in accordance with Fannie Mae’s policies; C. The Defendant be ordered to pay out accrued vacation time to Plaintiffs in accordance with Fannie Mae’s policies; D. The Defendant be ordered to compensate Plaintiffs for emotional suffering and humiliation; E. That Defendants be ordered to pay punitive damages for these reckless and malicious acts of discrimination; or in the alternative, liquidated damages; F. That judgement be entered for Plaintiffs jointly and severally against Defendant for all costs, including, but not limited to, court costs, expert fees, and attorney fees; and G. That Plaintiffs be granted such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper. VIII. JURY TRIAL Plaintiffs demand a trial by jury for all issues so triable. Quote
american_desi Posted July 31 Report Posted July 31 ఏది కుదరక పోతే చివరిగా Race Card వాడుతున్నారు Quote
Popular Post Tellugodu Posted July 31 Popular Post Report Posted July 31 5 hours ago, Coconut said: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70869858/1/kancharla-v-federal-national-mortgage-association/ Chesindi, yadava pani, sigulekunda inka case aa ? Court should outright reject this case. 5 Quote
greensboro Posted July 31 Report Posted July 31 1 hour ago, american_desi said: ఏది కుదరక పోతే చివరిగా Race Card వాడుతున్నారు ఇలాంటి మనుషళని డినాచురలైజ్ చెస్తారు థాహా రూల్ బుక్ ప్రకారమ్ 1 Quote
Hitman Posted July 31 Report Posted July 31 5 hours ago, Marsmangalodu said: Orey intha mandi desilunnara Fannie Mae = Entire Dallas Quote
2024 Posted July 31 Report Posted July 31 4 minutes ago, Hitman said: Fannie Mae = Entire Dallas Dallas is nothing compare with DC/VA Quote
baabaa Posted July 31 Report Posted July 31 https://www.perplexity.ai/search/https-www-courtlistener-com-do-fUt_F0geTzqEMbw5X29TFQ#0 These telugu people are really shameless. They were fired because of charitable contribution fraud. Now they are claiming discrimination. 1 Quote
kakatiya Posted July 31 Report Posted July 31 2 hours ago, Tellugodu said: Chesindi, yadava pani, sigulekunda inka case aa ? Court should outright reject this case. It appears fannie mae made a mistake here. Indians use indian non profit organizations that provide free education, health drives etc for charity and employer match. They initially realisd it is fraud and later found out theyare registered ngo. Quote
kakatiya Posted July 31 Report Posted July 31 4 minutes ago, baabaa said: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/https-www-courtlistener-com-do-fUt_F0geTzqEMbw5X29TFQ#0 These telugu people are really shameless. They were fired because of charitable contribution fraud and were fired. Now they are claiming discrimination. I dont think the fraud is proved.. Usually our NGOs are not recognized by corporates. For example lot of swamiji trusts are big ngo with multi million dollar crore turnover. Jeeyar trust is one of them. People donate 16-30,000 from salary.. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.