Joker_007 Posted August 13 Report Posted August 13 On 8/8/2025 at 7:16 AM, andhra_jp said: How this is considered to be fraud by EC.. It should be people's responsibility to update their registrations right ... they did the interview of a house who has single occupant but not the entire property.. that property has 6 portions on an average if we take 2 people that constitutes 12 people living at that time.. People who will stay on these kind of properties are on constant move with majority of them being migrant workers so i think #80 is not a big number here... EC can not deny a registration because some one lived there already and they did not remove the registration either unless the original person requests for deletion... Quote
mazar Posted August 13 Report Posted August 13 On 8/10/2025 at 1:20 PM, andhra_jp said: The above doesnt prove anything ee faltu cong posts vesi baaga try chesthunnav where is the proof that all new voters voted against cong? Quote
andhra_jp Posted August 14 Report Posted August 14 14 hours ago, Joker_007 said: How this is considered to be fraud by EC.. It should be people's responsibility to update their registrations right ... they did the interview of a house who has single occupant but not the entire property.. that property has 6 portions on an average if we take 2 people that constitutes 12 people living at that time.. People who will stay on these kind of properties are on constant move with majority of them being migrant workers so i think #80 is not a big number here... EC can not deny a registration because some one lived there already and they did not remove the registration either unless the original person requests for deletion... 14 hours ago, mazar said: The above doesnt prove anything ee faltu cong posts vesi baaga try chesthunnav where is the proof that all new voters voted against cong? Bihar Sir exercise case is ongoing in supreme court anna.. so lets wait for its verdict.. I am not blindly favoring neither congress nor BJP .. just presenting other side of the coin... Quote
andhra_jp Posted August 14 Report Posted August 14 SIR row: Supreme Court orders ECI to publish list of names excluded from Bihar draft roll The bench ordered the poll body to publish a searchable list of the excluded names along with the reasons for non-inclusion, in the district electoral officers’ websites by 5 p.m. on August 19 The Supreme Court on Thursday (August 14, 2025) ordered the Election Commission of India to publish the list of approximately 65 lakh names excluded from the draft roll that was published on August 1, 2025, after a Special Intensive Revision exercise in Bihar. In the interim order, the two-judge Bench comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Surya Kant, ordered the poll body to publish a searchable list of the excluded names, booth-wise, along with the reasons for non-inclusion, in the district electoral officers’ websites by 5 p.m. on August 19, 2025. Physical lists with reasons shall also be displayed on the notice boards of booth-level officers and block development/panchayat offices for manual access. The Bihar Chief Electoral Officer shall get soft copies of the list with reasons to be displayed on his website, and wide publicity for the same shall be given through regional and English newspapers, radio, TV and authorised social media platforms of Election Commission of India. Aadhaar as proof of identity and residence The public notice about the display will specifically mention that objections can be raised by aggrieved persons along with their Aadhaar copy, which shall be considered as a proof of identity and residence. The interim order directed the Election Commission to compile proof of compliance from BLOs/District Electoral Officers and place on record a collated status report on August 22 for further consideration by the Bench. The list and reasons should also be made searchable by typing in the EPIC number of the voter concerned, the interim order stated. The Bench posted the case for next hearing on August 22 at 2 p.m. Quote
andhra_jp Posted August 14 Report Posted August 14 Bihar SIR a battle between Election Commission’s power, citizens’ right to vote: Supreme Court Unlawful procedures in the hasty conduct of special intensive revision process are a ‘casual way of doing away with citizens’ right to vote’, say petitioners; judge says EC has some ‘elbow room’ for special revision, but in exceptional circumstances The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar’s electoral rolls is a battle between the Election Commission of India’s “power” over elections and the ordinary citizen’s right to be named in electoral rolls, and to be allowed to vote, the Supreme Court observed on Wednesday (August 13, 2025). Justice Joymalya Bagchi, part of the Bench headed by Justice Surya Kant hearing petitions against the SIR, observed that poll-bound Bihar was in the middle of a contest between Article 324, which empowers the Election Commission (EC) to control elections, and the constitutional right of adult suffrage enshrined in Article 326 of the Constitution. ‘Casual removal of voting rights’ The judge’s observation was in response to arguments raised by senior advocates A.M. Singhvi and Gopal Sankaranarayanan that the procedure of sending pre-filled enumeration forms to electors, only to later delete 65 lakh of them from the electoral roll without any prior enquiry or physical hearing — that too, with just two months left for the Assembly election in November — was, to say the least, a “casual way of doing away with citizens’ right to vote”. “An elector means someone who is already in the electoral roll. The enumeration form, indicative documents are just figments of the imagination of the EC. There is no such procedure in the Representation of the People Act. I have a statutory right to remain in the electoral roll. The procedure for removal from the electoral roll is ‘absolutely strict’ as intended by the Parliament. Removal would only be subsequent to an enquiry, even for one elector. It is the concept of the ‘little man’ laid down in the Supreme Court by Justice Krishna Iyer… Who gave the EC power to do this, under which law and what authority?” Mr. Sankaranarayanan submitted. EC’s discretionary power Justice Bagchi referred to the “elbow room” provided to the EC under Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People (RP) Act, which says that the EC can conduct a “special revision” in “such manner as it may think fit”. “Does this provision give the EC some residuary discretion to introduce elements like enumeration forms, additional indicative documents?” Justice Bagchi quizzed the petitioners. However, Mr. Sankaranarayanan responded that Section 21(3) only contemplated a special revision of “any one constituency or a part of a constituency”. “Can the provision be used to change the electoral rolls of the entire country from a time of your own choice? Does it authorise EC to embark on an en masse revision of the electoral rolls across the country?” the senior advocate responded. Section 21(3) was meant to be resorted to only in “exceptional circumstances”, he said. Summarising Section 21(3), Justice Bagchi said that it authorised the EC to devise procedures for special revision of the electoral roll in case of exceptional circumstances like a natural disaster. “Otherwise, the EC has to strictly follow Rules 4 to 24 of the Registration of Electors Rules,” Justice Bagchi said. Voter inclusive vs exclusionary Justice Bagchi and Mr. Singhvi debated on whether giving citizens an option to choose from as many as 11 ‘indicative’ documents to prove their citizenship and find their way back to the electoral roll could be considered “voter-inclusive” rather than “voter-exclusionary”, as argued by the petitioners. The judge pointed out that earlier summary revisions provided a choice of only seven documents. Mr. Singhvi, however, said the list of 11 documents was “impressive, but hollow”. They were either irrelevant, non-existent, or had minimum coverage in Bihar, he said, noting that only 1% of Bihar’s residents has a passport. Most women in the State do not have matriculation certificates, Mr. Singhvi said, adding that 87% had Aadhaar, which was not included as one of the EC’s 11 approved documents. Justice Kant said the central civil services were mostly populated by people from Bihar. “I am not talking about those few. I am talking about the poor and marginal population of Bihar who live in flood-prone, poverty-stricken and rural areas… The EC says these documents are indicative of your citizenship, but they have only exclusionary value,” Mr. Singhvi submitted. ‘EC’s malafide intentions’ So far, he said, the SIR has only witnessed the “de facto deletion of electors”. “The SIR policy is to presumptively exclude the entire mass of electors in Bihar since 2003 and then put the onus on them to come with any of the indicative documents to prove their citizenship... These are people who have voted in five to 10 elections since 2003, and you have deleted 65 lakh of them without any enquiry, physical interviews, verification or giving them an opportunity to produce documents,” Mr. Singhvi said. Advocate Prashant Bhushan argued that the “malafide” of the EC was evident from its haste in conducting the SIR, its refusal to accept Aadhaar or voter ID cards, its refusal to publish the names of the 65 lakh deleted voters and the specific reasons for their exclusion, and the removal of the mechanism to search for names in the draft electoral roll after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s press conference on the issue. Quote
Joker_007 Posted August 14 Report Posted August 14 8 hours ago, andhra_jp said: Bihar Sir exercise case is ongoing in supreme court anna.. so lets wait for its verdict.. I am not blindly favoring neither congress nor BJP .. just presenting other side of the coin... Bihar! i am not surprised with the number because about 30% of the population has migrated to other states mainly into construction, transportation and other Industry. These people did not requested for voter id removal. with aadhar linkage they might have found lot of discrepancies... They might have kept the latest one (may be the state where they currently reside) and removed the Bihar one. I am not surprised if people cry that their voter id is removed from Bihar as usual people want a link back to their home.. Quote
bhaigan Posted August 14 Report Posted August 14 On 8/7/2025 at 10:24 AM, Android_Halwa said: These issues are nothing new, they have always been there… Infact untik few years, I had two votes too. One in my village and one in Hyderabad… father’s name and house addresses….they are not 100% accurate. Evado a third party gallaki isthe vallu edo chesinattu update chestaru.. So VoteChori is real previous vote chori till mandal level or som rural or twon level, now the votechori level is very very huge This is treason against the Nation Supreme Court has given tight slap to EC today Sanghi Bigot's ! Quote
bhaigan Posted August 14 Report Posted August 14 On 8/8/2025 at 3:24 PM, Android_Halwa said: Yeah, RaGa for the few months have been talking a lot about EC rolls. For a moment even I thought there was some wrong doing as RaGa claimed proof but after watching the entire briefing, its was such a blunder. Even a booth worker knows about these discrepancies in electoral list and these are nothing new… Sanghi's like you dont cover up this is nothing new, bewakoof Accept BJP/RSS did fraud, and 2024 election mandate should be void, simple. Quote
bhaigan Posted August 14 Report Posted August 14 On 8/13/2025 at 6:33 AM, andhra_jp said: Self Goal by YCP What Jagan is doing ? Licking Modi's boot so that ECI will help Jagan in 2029 elections Sanghi Bigot's for a reason Quote
ElDragon Posted August 14 Report Posted August 14 4 minutes ago, bhaigan said: Sanghi's like you dont cover up this is nothing new, bewakoof Accept BJP/RSS did fraud, and 2024 election mandate should be void, simple. ninnu evadra lopaliki raanichindhi get out Quote
ElDragon Posted August 14 Report Posted August 14 3 minutes ago, bhaigan said: Self Goal by YCP What Jagan is doing ? Licking Modi's boot so that ECI will help Jagan in 2029 elections Sanghi Bigot's for a reason like you helped him in 2019 licking his ASSS? baffoon loafer Quote
bhaigan Posted August 14 Report Posted August 14 3 minutes ago, ElDragon said: like you helped him in 2019 licking his ASSS? baffoon loafer Who helped ? Bhosedk ! Sanghi Bigot ! Quote
Android_Halwa Posted August 14 Report Posted August 14 14 minutes ago, bhaigan said: Sanghi's like you dont cover up this is nothing new, bewakoof Accept BJP/RSS did fraud, and 2024 election mandate should be void, simple. Electoral list error ki fraud ki link endi ra bewakoof ga ? Nee mokaniki epudanna asalu electoral list susinaba asalu ? It is full of errors….indulo kotha emundi ? Leka ipude nidra lechinda ‘e RaGa ? Quote
bhaigan Posted August 14 Report Posted August 14 6 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said: Electoral list error ki fraud ki link endi ra bewakoof ga ? Nee mokaniki epudanna asalu electoral list susinaba asalu ? It is full of errors….indulo kotha emundi ? Leka ipude nidra lechinda ‘e RaGa ? nee bochu ki kathi ki unna link ra bhosedk Nuvvu chusinava electrol list asalu LK Full of errors which means Vote Chori is real ! nuvvu ippude nidra lechav Modi Mrodda chikadaniki Sanghi Bigot ! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.