Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 Signatures on the USCIS forms and G-28 need to have original wet signatures and the originals need to be produced if asked. Many employers didn't feel the need to keep the originals after they scanned the documents (scanned copies were kept). Now USCIS is issuing NOIDs left and right asking to produce the originals. Those who destroyed the originals are unable to produce the signatures in exactly the same way as scanned. Those cases are being denied - several hundreds.

Posted
12 minutes ago, coffee said:

 Signatures on the USCIS forms and G-28 need to have original wet signatures and the originals need to be produced if asked. Many employers didn't feel the need to keep the originals after they scanned the documents (scanned copies were kept). Now USCIS is issuing NOIDs left and right asking to produce the originals. Those who destroyed the originals are unable to produce the signatures in exactly the same way as scanned. Those cases are being denied - several hundreds.

This is for green card ?

Posted
34 minutes ago, coffee said:

 Signatures on the USCIS forms and G-28 need to have original wet signatures and the originals need to be produced if asked. Many employers didn't feel the need to keep the originals after they scanned the documents (scanned copies were kept). Now USCIS is issuing NOIDs left and right asking to produce the originals. Those who destroyed the originals are unable to produce the signatures in exactly the same way as scanned. Those cases are being denied - several hundreds.

G lo tantar

here electronic sign is same as paper sign 

no different infront of law

they don’t ask paper ever

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Looks like fake news to me. Electronic proof is enough. No one asks to produce paper evidence. But it would not shock me if it’s real. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

some cases are still paper based depending on filing date, asking for true copies isn’t strange but denials because a true copy could not be submitted is not the norm for adjudication 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Once my attorney told me to save the g28 and other signatures originals ( after ive sent them scanned copies)saying that uscis might ask for them sometimes …sounds like it’s true in some cases…

Posted
1 hour ago, Gorantlamdhav said:

G lo tantar

here electronic sign is same as paper sign 

no different infront of law

they don’t ask paper ever

 

59 minutes ago, Konebhar6 said:

Looks like fake news to me. Electronic proof is enough. No one asks to produce paper evidence. But it would not shock me if it’s real. 

Last week maa friend vala friend vala sister friend ni asked to send the original PEN also bro to cross check , But she lost it somewhere, so she filed a polze case, they are trying to find the original pen. LOL

  • Confused 1
Posted

At last they found another stupid way to scrutinize and harras people

Posted
1 hour ago, coffee said:

 Signatures on the USCIS forms and G-28 need to have original wet signatures and the originals need to be produced if asked. Many employers didn't feel the need to keep the originals after they scanned the documents (scanned copies were kept). Now USCIS is issuing NOIDs left and right asking to produce the originals. Those who destroyed the originals are unable to produce the signatures in exactly the same way as scanned. Those cases are being denied - several hundreds.

 attorneys always ask to mail the original signed in papers(physical copies of the papers with ink sign... not sure what is this context.. i believe attorneys mail the physical copies to USCIS

Posted

Ma attorney sign chesina pages mail cheyyamamtadi.. whenever we did H4/ ead extension.

Posted
28 minutes ago, nag said:

 attorneys always ask to mail the original signed in papers(physical copies of the papers with ink sign... not sure what is this context.. i believe attorneys mail the physical copies to USCIS

Never happened to me nor anyone whom I know

Posted

Quick question… do we have to send the original sign document or photo copy? 

Posted
47 minutes ago, ARYA said:

At last they found another stupid way to scrutinize and harras people

Ya next time Reynolds pen vaadali antaremo desi immi attorneys 

  • Haha 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, ARYA said:

Never happened to me nor anyone whom I know

Wat u talking va…all my gc related docs were physically signed (140, 485 etc). Dont remember for h1b though.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, akkum_bakkum said:

Wat u talking va…all my gc related docs were physically signed (140, 485 etc). Dont remember for h1b though.

K

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...