Deletedid1 Posted January 31, 2011 Report Posted January 31, 2011 If Pakistan ever uses nuclear weapons against India, it will be finished, says former national security adviser Brajesh Mishra, who has held the office under the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government.Mishra, awarded Padma Vibhushan last week, was talking to M. J. Akbar, editorial director, India Today on Aaj Tak's Seedhi Baat . He said Pakistan's army, which plays a central role in formulating the country's policies on issues such as Afghanistan, nuclear weapons and India, will never permit peaceful coexistence with India.On the Pakistan- China relationship, Mishra said the two countries are strategic partners."As China changed its stance on Kashmir, I said in next two- three years, we have to be careful on both the fronts. While China, like India, will adhere to the policy of no- first use of nuclear weapons, this cannot be said of Pakistan, but they will be finished if they use weapons against India," he said.Asked why Vajpayee held talks with Pakistan, including the Agra Summit, if he was aware of such hostility, Mishra said: " I was against the Agra Summit. It was a political decision and I was kept out of it … I had then remarked it will not succeed." He added all Indian PMs have wanted to hold talks with Pakistan.Akbar then referred to former Pakistan president Pervez Musharraf's statement that some people in the Indian government were out to sabotage the talks. " When there was no agreement, how can there be sabotage? The cabinet had decided against the terms of the agreement," Mishra said.To a question concerning speculations that the former NSA M. K. Narayanan's term was not extended owing to his differences with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh over Pakistan, Mishra said: " Maybe what you are saying is right."
keko__keka Posted January 31, 2011 Report Posted January 31, 2011 mari manam entha varaku sanka nakipotham antav benzu sCo_hmmthink sCo_hmmthink
wolverine Posted January 31, 2011 Report Posted January 31, 2011 [quote author=keko__keka link=topic=149744.msg1740120#msg1740120 date=1296489059]mari manam entha varaku sanka nakipotham antav benzu sCo_hmmthink sCo_hmmthink[/quote]enta varakuu anteyy konta varakuu .. ayinaa.. PAK ki anni picchal lev leyy mama.. India is going to be the no.1 r no.2 super power .. in 10 - 15 years time..
keko__keka Posted January 31, 2011 Report Posted January 31, 2011 [quote author=wolverine link=topic=149744.msg1740134#msg1740134 date=1296489251]enta varakuu anteyy konta varakuu .. ayinaa.. PAK ki anni picchal lev leyy mama.. India is going to be the no.1 r no.2 super power .. in 10 - 15 years time..[/quote]not being pessimistic but not possbile in 15 yrs esp as long as congi exists paki gallu manakante weak kavachu kani mental na m lu .,,effudu em avuddo aa country lo evadiki telvadu
ManUtd Posted January 31, 2011 Report Posted January 31, 2011 »Pak has more nuclear weapons than India: ReportPress Trust of India, Updated: January 31, 2011 16:44 ISTWashington: Pakistan has doubled its nuclear arms stockpile to 110 warheads, developing new weapons to deliver them and significantly accelerating production of uranium and plutonium for bombs to edge ahead of India.Islamabad's nuclear weapons stockpile now totals more than 110 deployed weapons in a sharp jump from an estimated 30-80 weapons four years ago, 'Washington Post' reported."Pakistan has expanded its nuclear weapons production capability rapidly", the Post quoted David Albright President of the Institute for Science and International Security as saying.Albright said that based on accelerated production of plutonium and highly enriched uranium, Pakistan may now have an arsenal up to 110 weapons.The non-government US analyst said that while continuing to produce weapons-grade uranium at two sites, Islamabad has sharply increased its production of plutonium, enabling it to make lighter warheads for more mobile delivery system.Pakistan's has developed a new missile Shaheen II, with a range of 1,500 miles which is about to go into operation deployment. The country has also developed nuclear capable land and air launched cruise missiles, the Institute said in a new report."The Pakistanis have significantly accelerated production of uranium and plutonium for bombs and developed new weapons to deliver them. After years of approximate weapons parity, experts said, Pakistan has now edged ahead of India, its nuclear-armed rival", Washington Post said.The paper said while Pakistan has produced more nuclear-armed weapons, India is believed to have larger existing stockpiles of such fissile material for future weapons.Dubbing Pakistan as one of the world's most unstable region, Post said an escalation of nuclear arms race in South Asia possess a dilemma for Obama Administration.It said in politically fragile Pakistan, the Administration is caught between fears of proliferation or possible terrorist attempts to seize nuclear materials and Pakistani suspicions that the US aims to control or limit its weapons programme and favours India.Quoting Pakistan's Defense attache at its embassy in Washington, Post said the number of Pakistani nuclear weapons are heavily deployed near its border with India.
Deletedid1 Posted January 31, 2011 Author Report Posted January 31, 2011 [quote author=Nandi link=topic=149744.msg1740157#msg1740157 date=1296489560]»Pak has more nuclear weapons than India: ReportPress Trust of India, Updated: January 31, 2011 16:44 ISTWashington: Pakistan has doubled its nuclear arms stockpile to 110 warheads, developing new weapons to deliver them and significantly accelerating production of uranium and plutonium for bombs to edge ahead of India.Islamabad's nuclear weapons stockpile now totals more than 110 deployed weapons in a sharp jump from an estimated 30-80 weapons four years ago, 'Washington Post' reported."Pakistan has expanded its nuclear weapons production capability rapidly", the Post quoted David Albright President of the Institute for Science and International Security as saying.Albright said that based on accelerated production of plutonium and highly enriched uranium, Pakistan may now have an arsenal up to 110 weapons.The non-government US analyst said that while continuing to produce weapons-grade uranium at two sites, Islamabad has sharply increased its production of plutonium, enabling it to make lighter warheads for more mobile delivery system.Pakistan's has developed a new missile Shaheen II, with a range of 1,500 miles which is about to go into operation deployment. The country has also developed nuclear capable land and air launched cruise missiles, the Institute said in a new report."The Pakistanis have significantly accelerated production of uranium and plutonium for bombs and developed new weapons to deliver them. After years of approximate weapons parity, experts said, Pakistan has now edged ahead of India, its nuclear-armed rival", Washington Post said.The paper said while Pakistan has produced more nuclear-armed weapons, India is believed to have larger existing stockpiles of such fissile material for future weapons.Dubbing Pakistan as one of the world's most unstable region, Post said an escalation of nuclear arms race in South Asia possess a dilemma for Obama Administration.It said in politically fragile Pakistan, the Administration is caught between fears of proliferation or possible terrorist attempts to seize nuclear materials and Pakistani suspicions that the US aims to control or limit its weapons programme and favours India.Quoting Pakistan's Defense attache at its embassy in Washington, Post said the number of Pakistani nuclear weapons are heavily deployed near its border with India.[/quote][url=http://andhrafriends.com/index.php?topic=149748.0]http://andhrafriends.com/index.php?topic=149748.0[/url]thet cant beat us conventionally............ only way they can cause maximum damage is through a nuclear warIndia is pursuing a very aggressive program of missile defence......... the only worry is Pak smuggling a nuclear weapon into India
Deletedid1 Posted January 31, 2011 Author Report Posted January 31, 2011 [quote author=keko__keka link=topic=149744.msg1740148#msg1740148 date=1296489433]not being pessimistic but not possbile in 15 yrs esp as long as congi exists paki gallu manakante weak kavachu kani mental na m lu .,,effudu em avuddo aa country lo evadiki telvadu[/quote] @gr33d mana rajeev gandhi pirikitanam valla manam inni kasthalu anubhavistunnam !q# !q# !q# !q# !q#
katharnak Posted January 31, 2011 Report Posted January 31, 2011 [img]http://www.crazyengineers.com/forum/images/avatars/lookaround_duck.gif[/img]
keko__keka Posted January 31, 2011 Report Posted January 31, 2011 [quote author=BENZBABU link=topic=149744.msg1740215#msg1740215 date=1296490080] @gr33d mana rajeev gandhi pirikitanam valla manam inni kasthalu anubhavistunnam !q# !q# !q# !q# !q#[/quote]indira kuda...lahore varaku vellina troops ni venakku rammandi ...inka sonia most timid leader india has ever seen sFun_duh sFun_duh sFun_duh
ManUtd Posted January 31, 2011 Report Posted January 31, 2011 [quote author=BENZBABU link=topic=149744.msg1740215#msg1740215 date=1296490080] @gr33d mana rajeev gandhi pirikitanam valla manam inni kasthalu anubhavistunnam !q# !q# !q# !q# !q#[/quote]rajiv em sesedu.... sCo_hmmthink sCo_hmmthink sCo_hmmthink a time lo war ledhu kadha
Deletedid1 Posted January 31, 2011 Author Report Posted January 31, 2011 [quote author=keko__keka link=topic=149744.msg1740235#msg1740235 date=1296490235]indira kuda...lahore varaku vellina troops ni venakku rammandi ...inka sonia most timid leader india has ever seen sFun_duh sFun_duh sFun_duh[/quote]in a sense Indira dint negotiate well.........but her decision was right............ its to hard to control a enemy territory which is hostilemore over its is even hard to maintain 90K POWs under Geneva norms
Deletedid1 Posted January 31, 2011 Author Report Posted January 31, 2011 [quote author=Nandi link=topic=149744.msg1740243#msg1740243 date=1296490324]rajiv em sesedu.... sCo_hmmthink sCo_hmmthink sCo_hmmthink a time lo war ledhu kadha[/quote]2 instances1) during operation brass tracks general sundarjee requested to go into pak and split it into two before its can become a nuclear nation2) India feared to loose muslim votes and friendship of Gulf countries if it provides bases for Israel airforce which was planning to bomb kahuta nuclear power plan
keko__keka Posted January 31, 2011 Report Posted January 31, 2011 [quote author=BENZBABU link=topic=149744.msg1740249#msg1740249 date=1296490391]in a sense Indira dint negotiate well.........but her decision was right............ its to hard to control a enemy territory which is hostilemore over its is even hard to maintain 90K POWs under Geneva norms[/quote]hmm intresting sCo_hmmthink sCo_hmmthink
.thumb.jpg.ce42bb16ec102475a78c2087ce269c7d.jpg)
.thumb.gif.343fe49c7e1c507ae0056326bd8cf77e.gif)
Recommended Posts