cinderella man Posted February 22, 2011 Report Posted February 22, 2011 Should India be broken up into smaller states? After the decision to give statehood to Telangana, many analysts want a new States Reorganization Commission.India today has 28 states. Assuming 20% population growth since the last census, [size=10pt][color=red]Uttar Pradesh has 198 million people, more than Brazil, Russia or Pakistan. Maharashtra has 106 million, West Bengal 96 million and Andhra Pradesh 90 million. All are much bigger than France or Britain. At the other end of the scale, Sikkim has just 0.6 million people, Mizoram 1.1 million and Arunachal Pradesh 1.3 million. Clearly, statehood has been determined by political expediency, not logic.[/color][/size]Is there an economic case for carving smaller states out of large ones? Some analysts say small states won’t be economically viable. Others believe small states will fare better, since ordinary people will have better access to power elites. Consider the record of three states carved out of larger ones in 2000 - [color=green]Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand. Ignore data for the first few transitional years. Instead, focus on the average growth rate of gross state domestic product for the last five years, from 2004-05 to 2008-09.Amazingly, all three new states have grown fabulously fast. Uttarakhand has averaged 9.31% growth annually, Jharkhand 8.45%, and Chattisgarh 7.35%. All three states belong to what was historically called the BIMARU zone, a slough of despond where humans and economies stagnated. Out of this stagnant pool have now emerged highly dynamic states.[/color]Some caveats are in order. The central government exempted industries in Uttarakhand from excise duty, a concession already applicable to other hill states such as Himachal Pradesh, Kashmir and the north-eastern states. Many big industries rushed to Uttarakhand for the tax break, giving the state’s growth an artificial boost. Still, Uttarakhand easily outperformed Himachal Pradesh (8.47%) and Kashmir (5.98%). Remember, Uttarakhand was once considered the poorest, most backward part of UP. After statehood, it has become a growth champion.Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh were the most backward parts of Bihar and Madhya Pradesh, which in turn were among the most backward states of India. Yet, after becoming separate states, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh have emerged as industrial dynamos. Both have large tribal belts with pathetic infrastructure. In Chhattisgarh, four-fifths of habitations lack road access. Both states have ample minerals like coal and iron ore. But this was not an economic advantage when they were part of larger states. Rather, their mineral revenues were diverted to state capitals. This diversion ended after they became separate states.Their rapid economic growth has been tainted by massive corruption. Sheer money power enabled an independent, Madhu Koda, to become chief minister of Jharkhand and rule for years. He handed out dozens of mining licences, instead of auctioning them to the highest bidder. Alas, this problem affects the whole of India: Natural resources from coal to the telecom spectrum are constantly gifted to favoured parties instead of being auctioned, and this enables politicians to amass fortunes. But just as the telecom revolution has been good for India despite corruption, so has private entry into mining and processing.Jharkhand and Chattisgarh are not growing fast simply through mining. They have experienced a manufacturing boom. Read what research firm Indicus Analytica has to show: "Since 2001, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh have moved up into the top 10 (industrial states), displacing Rajasthan and Punjab... The phenomenal growth in these two states has seen the share of manufacturing in their GDP rise dramatically as they have attracted industrial projects. Looking at the share of income that originates in the manufacturing sector, these two states have shown higher levels than Maharashtra, Haryana and Tamil Nadu...Being newer and smaller states, they responded more rapidly than their larger — and in some cases better endowed - neighbours… Raipur in Chhattisgarh has now entered the top 10 districts of India in manufacturing, with two industrial estates at Urla and Siltara".Now, millions of tribals have been bypassed, especially in remote areas where Maoism flourishes. However, the biggest tribal agitations against giant mining projects are in Orissa. The big Jharkhand projects of Tata and Mittal are in limbo since the state has stalled land acquisition.The neglect of tribals and consequent rise of Maoism is a blot on the record of Jharkhand and Chattisgarh. The creation of the vigilante Salwa Judum to counter Maoists in Chattisgarh has widely been condemned for violating civil rights.The two states account for 68% of all Maoist attacks. That’s bad for civil rights and security. Yet, achieving fast growth amidst such insurgency is a major economic feat. It highlights the dynamism created when backward regions become separate states. Hopefully, this economic dynamism will help mitigate the backwardness on which Maoism thrives.
cinderella man Posted February 22, 2011 Author Report Posted February 22, 2011 rational ga chadavandi...very good article...
keko__keka Posted February 22, 2011 Report Posted February 22, 2011 Amazingly, all three new states have grown fabulously fast. Uttarakhand has averaged 9.31% growth annually, Jharkhand 8.45%, and Chattisgarh 7.35%. All three states belong to what was historically called the BIMARU zone, a slough of despond where humans and economies stagnated. Out of this stagnant pool have now emerged highly dynamic states.Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh were the most backward parts of Bihar and Madhya Pradesh, which in turn were among the most backward states of India. Yet, after becoming separate states, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh have emerged as industrial dynamos. Both have large tribal belts with pathetic infrastructure. In Chhattisgarh, four-fifths of habitations lack road access. Both states have ample minerals like coal and iron ore. But this was not an economic advantage when they were part of larger states. Rather, their mineral revenues were diverted to state capitals. This diversion ended after they became separate statessingareni boggu antha tg ke ...full electricity ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"!
cinderella man Posted February 22, 2011 Author Report Posted February 22, 2011 [quote author=keko__keka link=topic=158664.msg1890730#msg1890730 date=1298384510]Amazingly, all three new states have grown fabulously fast. Uttarakhand has averaged 9.31% growth annually, Jharkhand 8.45%, and Chattisgarh 7.35%. All three states belong to what was historically called the BIMARU zone, a slough of despond where humans and economies stagnated. Out of this stagnant pool have now emerged highly dynamic states.Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh were the most backward parts of Bihar and Madhya Pradesh, which in turn were among the most backward states of India. Yet, after becoming separate states, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh have emerged as industrial dynamos. Both have large tribal belts with pathetic infrastructure. In Chhattisgarh, four-fifths of habitations lack road access. Both states have ample minerals like coal and iron ore. But this was not an economic advantage when they were part of larger states. Rather, their mineral revenues were diverted to state capitals. This diversion ended after they became separate statessingareni boggu antha tg ke ...full electricity ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"![/quote]coal mines and NTPC central government control lo untundhi kadha baa... sCo_hmmthink sCo_hmmthink sCo_hmmthink
keko__keka Posted February 22, 2011 Report Posted February 22, 2011 [quote author=cinderella man link=topic=158664.msg1890736#msg1890736 date=1298384665]coal mines and NTPC central government control lo untundhi kadha baa... sCo_hmmthink sCo_hmmthink sCo_hmmthink[/quote]coal is in hands of state as well..ntpc is just a freking power generation point which needs coal ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"!as of now lots of coal is being sent to vijayawasda provate thermal electric plants...even there is big scope for bringing new thermal electric plants in karimanagar ~"! ~"! ~"!
cinderella man Posted February 22, 2011 Author Report Posted February 22, 2011 [quote author=keko__keka link=topic=158664.msg1890745#msg1890745 date=1298384804]coal is in hands of state as well..ntpc is just a freking power generation point which needs coal ~"! ~"! ~"! ~"!as of now lots of coal is being sent to vijayawasda provate thermal electric plants...even there is big scope for bringing new thermal electric plants in karimanagar ~"! ~"! ~"![/quote]yeah...already another NTPC under construction near bhupalpally(warangal district)... ~"! ~"! ~"!
keko__keka Posted February 22, 2011 Report Posted February 22, 2011 [quote author=cinderella man link=topic=158664.msg1890768#msg1890768 date=1298385102]yeah...already another NTPC under construction near bhupalpally(warangal district)... ~"! ~"! ~"![/quote]hmm ntpc undoddu mama...centre koduklni...request seyali...electricty kosam... sFun_duh sFun_duh sFun_duh
cinderella man Posted February 22, 2011 Author Report Posted February 22, 2011 [quote author=keko__keka link=topic=158664.msg1890785#msg1890785 date=1298385293]hmm ntpc undoddu mama...centre koduklni...request seyali...electricty kosam... sFun_duh sFun_duh sFun_duh[/quote]but we will get our share kadha..
keko__keka Posted February 22, 2011 Report Posted February 22, 2011 [quote author=cinderella man link=topic=158664.msg1890793#msg1890793 date=1298385424]but we will get our share kadha..[/quote]no mama..not really...depends on state dammu.....mana ramagundam ntpc lo ...ap share takkuva...kerala tamilnadu share ekkuva.......mana ap naaa maddda gaallaki negotiate seyatam raledu sFun_duh sFun_duh
cinderella man Posted February 22, 2011 Author Report Posted February 22, 2011 [quote author=keko__keka link=topic=158664.msg1890798#msg1890798 date=1298385509]no mama..not really...depends on state dammu.....mana ramagundam ntpc lo ...ap share takkuva...kerala tamilnadu share ekkuva.......mana ap naaa maddda gaallaki negotiate seyatam raledu sFun_duh sFun_duh[/quote] @gr33d but hopefully they negotiate and get our share properly this time.. sFun_duh sFun_duh
keko__keka Posted February 22, 2011 Report Posted February 22, 2011 [quote author=cinderella man link=topic=158664.msg1890807#msg1890807 date=1298385628] @gr33d but hopefully they negotiate and get our share properly this time.. sFun_duh sFun_duh[/quote]aa penta undoddu ante....private plant vallaki ivvali mama....full share state ki vastadi....oka multi millianire kuda tayar avuthadu..samajam lo
cinderella man Posted February 22, 2011 Author Report Posted February 22, 2011 [quote author=keko__keka link=topic=158664.msg1890822#msg1890822 date=1298385796]aa penta undoddu ante....private plant vallaki ivvali mama....full share state ki vastadi....oka multi millianire kuda tayar avuthadu..samajam lo[/quote]kaanivvaru baa..coal mines lo machinery use chesthunte ne godavalu chesthunnaru jobs pothunnai ani...ika privatisation ante manollu ekkada urukuntaru...
keko__keka Posted February 22, 2011 Report Posted February 22, 2011 [quote author=cinderella man link=topic=158664.msg1890842#msg1890842 date=1298386208]kaanivvaru baa..coal mines lo machinery use chesthunte ne godavalu chesthunnaru jobs pothunnai ani...ika privatisation ante manollu ekkada urukuntaru...[/quote]privitisations of mines kadu mama....private thermal plant ki coal ivvali antunna ~"! ~"! ~"!
Deletedid1 Posted February 22, 2011 Report Posted February 22, 2011 the solution for development is decentralization of power............... not creation of more states
Alfred pichikaaki Posted February 22, 2011 Report Posted February 22, 2011 very good article.. sHa_clap4 sHa_clap4 its actually ture... state divide aithe there is chance of growth.. but mana state oka politician kuda sakkaga ledu.... andaru kakkurrthi L kodkule... };_ };_
Recommended Posts