thunderstorm369 Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 HYDERABAD: In a bid to mollify anti-Telangana protesters and pave the way for smooth creation of a separate state, the Centre is weighing the options of declaring Hyderabad a Union Territory (UT). Sources in touch with the Congress high command said the latter avers that according Union Territory status to Hyderabad would pave the way for carving separate Telangana state without much resistance from the Andhra and Rayalaseema regions. A preliminary exercise to convince the Telangana Rashtra Samiti (TRS) leadership to relinquish their claim over Hyderabad and allow it a Union Territory status has also begun. But TRS leaders are opposed to it tooth and nail. According to sources, the proposal has been under consideration of the Union government ever since a section of the Congress and MIM leaders raised the issue. Views of all major political parties would be elicited on special status to Hyderabad, the sources said. As of now, the TRS and Telangana Congress leaders are vehemently opposing the separation of Hyderabad from Telangana while those from the other regions are in favour of a UT status. Two city ministers, Danam Nagendar and Mukesh Goud, too have been batting for the UT status. The proposal is not feasible as it is fraught with serious negative consequences, said Telangana ideologue K Jaishankar. “Union Territory status for Hyderabad is neither feasible nor advisable. The very survival of a Union Territory in the heart of Telangana is a problem. If it is created against the wishes of the Telangana people, will they allow the city to be supplied with water and power from Telangana?” Jaishankar asked. While some Congress MLAs from Hyderabad are also said to be in favour of UT status for the state capital , the MIM is still undecided. “The MIM would stand to gain considerably if Hyderabad is part of Telangana in which they can expand their base, but political compulsions from the Congress may force it to settle for UT status. Indications are that the party is unhappy with the Congress as it was not consulted on the issue at all,” an analyst said. Those in favour of UT status are of the view that the more they oppose the division of the state, the greater the chances of getting special status for Hyderabad. “After standing firm on not dividing the state, if we agree to let it happen provided Hyderabad is made UT, there is a good chance that the Centre would accept it,” reasoned one leader. The MLAs from the non-Telangana regions met on Wednesday at the residence of former minister J C Diwakar Reddy and appointed noted united Andhra Pradesh advocate and Kurnool MLA TG Venkatesh convenor to carry forward their campaign against the division of the state and according UT status for Hyderabad. The MLAs want to meet Congress president Sonia Gandhi and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi and air their views. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/Centre-mulling-UT-status-for-Hyderabad/articleshow/5346043.cms
fasi Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 UT avuthey andhra ki pedda bokka....... UT stus can be removed any time by central govt. 2-3 yrs lo Ut status tisesaru anukoo apudu malli katha first ki vasthadhi....better andhra people invest in vizag, vij as there capital and build there own rather than depending on Hyd as capital.
govardhan Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 UT avuthey telangana ki pedda bokka.....UT status can be removed and also assigned any time by central govt. 2-3 yrs lo Ut status teesesina teeyakapoyina....cities like vja...vizag develop avvutayi...but Hyd ni Ut gane vadileste, telangana ki bokka...so telangana people better invest in karimnagar..suryapet...warangal as their state capital and build there own rather than depending on hy as capital
marali Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 UT avuthey telangana ki pedda bokka.....UT status can be removed and also assigned any time by central govt. 2-3 yrs lo Ut status teesesina teeyakapoyina....cities like vja...vizag develop avvutayi...but Hyd ni Ut gane vadileste, telangana ki bokka...so telangana people better invest in karimnagar..suryapet...warangal as their state capital and build there own rather than depending on hy as capital meh
sid_22 Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 UT avuthey andhra ki pedda bokka....... UT stus can be removed any time by central govt. 2-3 yrs lo Ut status tisesaru anukoo apudu malli katha first ki vasthadhi....better andhra people invest in vizag, vij as there capital and build there own rather than depending on Hyd as capital. Idemi cheddi kaadu oka roju vesukoni tarvata next day teeseyaniki..... Once Hyderabad as UT is declared its final for your life time atleast........ Neeku and Naaku kooda telisindi Hyderabad varake...... I recently read an article also.... it states Visakhapatnam was declared one of ten fastest growing cities of the world in a recent study conducted by the United Nations...... In the world not in India....... It has the largest natural harbour in India and a massive 25000 acres steel plant.... Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visakhapatnam#Economy Telangana vallake pedda Bokka....... Me life ni me chetulu tone chedupukunturru.... Em chestam Edavandi I'm Hyderabadi So I want it to be UT, based on the lines of Delhi NCR.... Jai Hyderabad.....
govardhan Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 you sir spoken like retard! reply to chill buddy.....before u comment on any post try to read the previous ones too...my post was just a reply to fasi, if u observe i have used the same logic he used,infact the same wordings he used in his post. my post is just a reply to him....if u cant realize this, am to say that "u are behaving like a retard"......so chill down and think wise...
googledude Posted December 17, 2009 Report Posted December 17, 2009 UT ithey bagundu it will be a real tribute to people who have had hands in developing Hyd as we see it today
Recommended Posts