Technikfreak Posted December 25, 2009 Author Report Posted December 25, 2009 Question 7 In Telangana regions, only few areas cultivate one crop a year and very rarely two crops a year while most of the land doesn’t even cultivate single crop. In both the Godavari districts, Krishna and Guntur district, two crops a year is common and there are times where even 3 crops a year are cultivated. The only reason is WATER. ________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________ Ans: Not all regions of Godavari/Krishna/Guntur cultivated three crops a year. And this is not the reality anymore, particularly for Krishna river basin. The water for second crop itself is not guaranteed anymore (Pulichintala is the solution for this).
Technikfreak Posted December 25, 2009 Author Report Posted December 25, 2009 Question 8 33% of the population in Mahaboobnagar district have left the district for livelihood to different parts of the state due to draught and majority of them are working as daily labour. No other district has so many people who fled the home place due to lack of livelihood and working as daily labour. ________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________ Ans: This is not a problem unique to Mahabubnagar. Srikakulam and Vizianagaram districts have the same problem. The problem in Mahabubnagar district is conveniently projected as a Telangana issue
Technikfreak Posted December 25, 2009 Author Report Posted December 25, 2009 Question 9 Dairy development corporation of AP purchases milk from farmers across the state for distribution. For the same milk, in Andhra, the government pay Rs. 24 to the farmers and in Telangana they pay Rs. 22 per litre. Partiality is shown even in milk ________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________ Ans: Milk procurement price is dependent on various quality parameters, one of them being the fat content. For eg., Mahabubnagar district in the 90s produced milk with low fat content (reasons ranged from feeding practices and quality cattle, to diluting milk with water). The then Govt installed Technical Assistance Services to implement bank credits for procuring quality cattle, cattle insurance, cattle vaccinations, Milk testing centers etc. This led to increase in Milk production, Fat content (from 6% to 7.3%) and an increase of profits for Milk producers (in Wanaparthy segment alone, there was an increase of 40laks in profit, in 3 years). The point to be noted here is that there's no discrimination done here, as projected by the statement above. In fact, the AP dairy federation's Milk Procurement Price ranges from Rs.25.50 to Rs. 28.00/Ltr for Buffalo milk and Rs. 11.91 to Rs. 12.53/Ltr for Cow milk.
Technikfreak Posted December 25, 2009 Author Report Posted December 25, 2009 Question 10 In between 2005-2008 government sold lands worth Rs. 20000 crores in and around Hyderabad which was utilized to build projects in Rayalaseema and Andhra. ________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________ Ans: Properties were sold not just in Hyderabad. This happened in Vijayawada and Vizag as well to some extent. The figure of 20000 crores itself is highly debatable. Added to that, the Govt has spent (and has been spending) on the following Telangana projects - 1. Alisagar Lift Irrigation Project 2. J. Chokka Rao Project (Phase I and II) 3. Gutpa Lift Irrigation Project 4. Alimineti Madhava Reddy Project 5. Sriram Sagar Project (Phase I and II) and the flood canal 6. Bhima Lift Irrigation project 7. Sripada Rao Lift Irrigation project 8. Dummugudem project 9. Kalwakurthi Lift Irrigation Project 10. Nettempadu Lift Irrigation Project 11. Lendi Project 12. Suddavagu, Peddavagu, Palemvagu, Gollavagu, Ralivagu, Mathadivagu, Modikuntavagu and Gundlavagu projects 13. Komuram Bheem Project 14. Koilsagar Lift Irrigation Scheme 15. Kinnerasani Project 16. Ichampally Project (Govt has been trying to resolve longstanding interstate issues and is trying to get national project status for this. It is worth noting that no Telangana leader/intellectual has tried to get these issues resolved or lobbied for the national status and yet non-telangana regions are somehow blamed for non-implementation of this project.) It should also be noted that many of these projects are lift-based. This is due to the topography of the Telangana region (Deccan Plateau). The power 'consumption' for operating/maintaining these projects are enormous. For eg. the Nettempadu, Kalwakurty and Devadula projects require 1200MW of power. On the other hand, the Pulichintala project will add 120MW and Polavaram project will add 960 MW of power 'production'.
Technikfreak Posted December 25, 2009 Author Report Posted December 25, 2009 Question 11 Not even a single project was completed in Telangana in the last 5 years while several projects were completed in Andhra and Rayalaseema. ________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________ Ans: Another baseless statement. The following projects in Telangana regions have become operational in the last 5 years - 1. Devadula Lift Irrigation Project (Phase I) (benefits 60,000 acres) became operational in March, 2008. 2. Alisagar Lift Irrigation Project (benefits 54,000 acres) became operational in November, 2007. 3. A. Madhava Reddy Project(Phase I) (benefits 50,000 acres) became operational in September, 2006. Compared to this, the following projects became operational in Andhra/Rayalaseema region - 1. Pushkara Lift Irrigation in East Godavari district (mostly to the non-irrigated North and Westerm parts of the district). This project benefits 80,000 acres. 2. Tadipudi Lift Irrigation scheme, mostly for providing drinking water to the water-starved upland mandals of West Godavari district, is partially Operational. 3. Brahmamsagar Project (benefits 50,000 acres) in Cuddapah district 4. Pedderu Reservoir (benefits 13,000 acres) in Visakhapatnam district 5. Jhanjhavati Project (benefits 9000 acres) in Vizianagaram district Further details can be obtained at http://ppms.cgg.gov.in/Reports.do (login as guest/guest).
Technikfreak Posted December 25, 2009 Author Report Posted December 25, 2009 Question 12 3 TMC of water from Gandipet is sufficient to supply drinking water to our city. Every year 1700 TMC of water is wasted and is flown into Bay of Bengal from river Godavari. Starting from Nizambad to Bay of Bengal there is no project allowed to build on Godavari. If it is built leaders in Godavari districts fear that the fertile lands in the area may fall short of water. If the Godavari water is utilized properly, there will be no scarcity for food grains in our state. ________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________ Ans: The statement is contradicting itself. Godavari districts are not using the 1700 tmc water, as the statement says. What would they gain, by blocking projects that utilize this water ? 1700 tmc is equivalent to more than 4 Nagarjunasagar reservoirs ! And 1200 tmc is way above the requirements of telangana region, which means there will still be water left to sea. Why would Godavari districts block when they have no use of this water ? Also, "no project allowed" implies blaming non-telangana region. Who 'allows' the projects ?? If the allegation is that there is politicial interference, then the Telangana MLAs are more in number, compared to Godavari districts. Why didn't anyone resort to such 'Aamarana Deeksha' for getting projects built ? Telangana leaders/intellectuals conveniently cover up the fact that longstanding interstate issues existed between Maharashtra, (the now) Chattisgarh and AP for Ichampally Project. Why haven't any of these leaders/intellectuals helped the Govt in these issues, if they're so interested ? They also do not mention that the Sripada Sagar dam is one of the larger capacity dams built on Godavari river for the benefit of Telanagana region, after AP was formed. Godavari dists are mostly irrigated based on the projects/canals built by the british (other than the new dowleswaram barrage). They couldn't even get new projects implemented for benefitting the backward western parts (the manyam areas) and they're being blamed for blocking Telangana projects.
Technikfreak Posted December 25, 2009 Author Report Posted December 25, 2009 Thats all folks. There was an fact about KCR posted by some one named RAJA. Here it is... I request all dear learned readers to have an unbiased analysis the statements of the leaders/people with vested interests. Blindly believing or following misleading leaders is just fooling ourselves. When KCR joined Congress in 2004, soon he was given a crores worth land for Rs. 100 per sq. yard (on the same road where Mysoora and late YSR have theirs too. During road extensions in 2005, govt. paid a compensation @ Rs. 80,000 per sq. Yard and you can expect the actual price in open market). Now KCR and his family owns about 14+ Bars and Restaurants in the twin cities including 4 in Jubilee Hills and Banjara Hills area. The above facts are mentioned just to alert people of KCR and TRS. As educted people we have the responsibility of gathering the right and correct information and help others from being carried away by misleading leaders and emotions.
revanth Posted December 25, 2009 Report Posted December 25, 2009 karimnagar,nizamabad backward kaada ?????? mathi unde matladuthunnava asalu....ha ha ha. " "
mba Posted December 25, 2009 Report Posted December 25, 2009 awesome collection dude.. thanks for posting
Recommended Posts