k2s Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='shakkku' timestamp='1324558453' post='1301180275'] [/quote] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] [color=#FF3300][b]Question 1[/b][/color][/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] Two switches SA and SB are connected as shown below. Given the below partial configuration, which two statements are true about VLAN traffic? (Choose two)[/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] [img]http://www.certprepare.com/images/SWITCH/vlanvtpstp/vtp_traffic.jpg[/img][/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] A – VLANs 1-5 will be blocked if fa0/10 goes down. B – VLANs 6-10 have a port priority of 128 on fa0/10. C – VLANs 6-10 will use fa0/10 as a backup only. D – VLANs 1-10 are configured to load share between fa0/10 and fa0/12.[/font][/color]
ding Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 C&D port priority entha varaku assin cheyochu, i mean lower limit, higher limit
k2s Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='shakkku' timestamp='1324558914' post='1301180302'] C&D port priority entha varaku assin cheyochu, i mean lower limit, higher limit [/quote] XXXX-Prod-SW(config)#int gig 0/1 XXXX-Prod-SW(config-if)#spanning-tree port-priority ? <0-240> port priority in increments of 16
ding Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='k2s' timestamp='1324559093' post='1301180318'] XXXX-Prod-SW(config)#int gig 0/1 XXXX-Prod-SW(config-if)#spanning-tree port-priority ? [b]<0-240> port priority in increments of 16[/b] [/quote]
k2s Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Posted December 22, 2011 [color=#FF3300][font=Verdana,][b] Question 2:[/b][/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] The network operations center has received a call stating that Users in VLAN 107 are unable to access resources through R1. From the information contained in the graphic, what is the cause of this problem?[/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] [img]http://www.certprepare.com/images/SWITCH/vlanvtpstp/vtp_pruning.jpg[/img][/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] [img]http://www.certprepare.com/images/SWITCH/vlanvtpstp/vtp_pruning_output.jpg[/img][/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] A – spanning tree is not enabled on VLAN 107 B – VTP is pruning VLAN 107 C – VLAN 107 does not exist on switch SA D – VLAN 107 is not configured on the trunk[/font][/color]
ding Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 I think it is option B, not pruned list lo vlan 107 ledu kaabati, ika ivaaltiki saalu baa [img]http://i28.tinypic.com/2hdwrxv.gif[/img] ika thinesi padukovaali, repu malli modaledadaam......
k2s Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Posted December 22, 2011 [color=#FF3300][font=Verdana,][b] Question 1:[/b][/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] Study the exhibit carefully. Both host stations are part of the same subnet but are in different VLANs. On the basis of the information presented in the exhibit, which statement is true about an attempt to ping from host to host?[/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] [img]http://www.certprepare.com/images/SWITCH/InterVLANRouting/samesubnetDifferentVLAN.jpg[/img][/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] A – Layer 3 device is needed for the ping command to be successful. B – A trunk port will need to be configured on the link between SA and SB for the ping command to be successful. C – The two different hosts will need to be in the same VLAN in order for the ping command to be successful. D – The ping command will be successful without any further configuration changes.[/font][/color]
k2s Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='shakkku' timestamp='1324560436' post='1301180402'] I think it is option B, not pruned list lo vlan 107 ledu kaabati, ika ivaaltiki saalu baa [img]http://i28.tinypic.com/2hdwrxv.gif[/img] ika thinesi padukovaali, repu malli modaledadaam...... [/quote] Agreed - [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] In the “forwarding state and not pruned” we don’t see VLAN 107 so the administrator had wrongly configured this VLAN as pruned.[/font][/color]
ding Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 option A anukunta, communicatin b/w different vlan's need layer 3 device.
k2s Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='shakkku' timestamp='1324560708' post='1301180429'] option A anukunta, communicatin b/w different vlan's need layer 3 device. [/quote] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] [color=#3333CC][b]Answer:[/b][/color] D[/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] [color=#66FF00][b]Explanation:[/b][/color][/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] For two hosts in different VLANs, we must use a layer 3 device to transport packages between them. However, in this case both switches are set in “access” mode therefore the VLAN information sent between them will be set as untagged. Moreover, they are in the same subnet so they can ping each other without a layer 3 device.[/font][/color]
k2s Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Posted December 22, 2011 [color=#FF3300][font=Verdana,][b] Question 2:[/b][/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] Based on the following exhibit, which problem is preventing users on VLAN 100 from pinging addresses on VLAN 200?[/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] [img]http://www.certprepare.com/images/SWITCH/InterVLANRouting/routing_interVLAN.jpg[/img][/font][/color] [color=#333333][font=Verdana,] A – Native VLAN mismatch. B – Subinterfaces should be created on Fa0/7 and Fa0/8 on DLS1. C – Trunking needs to be enabled. D – The ip routing command is missing on DLS1.[/font][/color]
ding Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='k2s' timestamp='1324561093' post='1301180452'] [color=#3333CC][b]Answer:[/b][/color] D [color=#66FF00][b]Explanation:[/b][/color] For two hosts in different VLANs, we must use a layer 3 device to transport packages between them. However, in this case both switches are set in “access” mode therefore the VLAN information sent between them will be set as untagged. Moreover, they are in the same subnet so they can ping each other without a layer 3 device. [/quote] rendu same subnet ayinaa , different vlans lo unai kada, so diff vlans ala communicate cheyocha, without layer 3.....
k2s Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='shakkku' timestamp='1324561455' post='1301180468'] rendu same subnet ayinaa , different vlans lo unai kada, so diff vlans ala communicate cheyocha, without layer 3..... [/quote] adey antunnadu vadu kuda..... naaku doubt ee.... unless u configure it & check
ding Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 daantlo IP routing command miss ayindi, anduke layer 3 cheyalekapothundi
ding Posted December 22, 2011 Report Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='k2s' timestamp='1324561578' post='1301180473'] adey antunnadu vadu kuda..... naaku doubt ee.... unless u configure it & check [/quote] ipudu ade ques certification lo adigithe naa paristhithi em kaanu,
.thumb.jpg.ce42bb16ec102475a78c2087ce269c7d.jpg)
Recommended Posts