kakatiya Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 [quote name='mustang302' timestamp='1339296366' post='1301943024'] Coz...Mr.JC is the real person...and all our indian mitholigies are stories...!! [/quote] nope you are wrong ... There are enough evidences to proove great king krishnas existence...... But no evidence to prrove ramas existence...... On the same lines for example there is no historical evidence to proove socrates existence.... No one else wrote about socrates existence except plato... So many historians believe socrates can be a created historic figure.... Likewas king rama... We read mostly about him through valmiki... But still many tribes narrate folk tales of lord rama for years... Though there are any scholarly knowledge exchanged between them from aristocratic or civilised tribes.... And our lord Venkateswara too once a normal peasent lived in the valley of nilgiris....... On the same lines christ was a enhanced character to make a rebelion to fight against the higher aristocrates.... Even his appearence slighty normadic is changed much a greek look ... Just for soldiers to belive he was took the shape of god for them.... In fact christwas a highly talented healing therapist and perfect hypnotist....
CHANAKYA Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 [quote name='mustang302' timestamp='1339296366' post='1301943024'] Coz...Mr.JC is the real person...and all our indian mitholigies are stories...!! [/quote] lol.... dont give false statements ... [img]http://www.manadb.com/Smileys/default/Brahmi.gif[/img]
CHANAKYA Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 [quote name='kakatiya' timestamp='1339297459' post='1301943104'] nope you are wrong ... There are enough evidences to proove great king krishnas existence...... But no evidence to prrove ramas existence...... On the same lines for example there is no historical evidence to proove socrates existence.... No one else wrote about socrates existence except plato... So many historians believe socrates can be a created historic figure.... Likewas king rama... We read mostly about him through valmiki... But still many tribes narrate folk tales of lord rama for years... Though there are any scholarly knowledge exchanged between them from aristocratic or civilised tribes.... And our lord Venkateswara too once a normal peasent lived in the valley of nilgiris....... On the same lines christ was a enhanced character to make a rebelion to fight against the higher aristocrates.... Even his appearence slighty normadic is changed much a greek look ... Just for soldiers to belive he was took the shape of god for them.... In fact christwas a highly talented healing therapist and perfect hypnotist.... [/quote] Gp....
Spartan Posted June 10, 2012 Author Report Posted June 10, 2012 [quote name='kakatiya' timestamp='1339297459' post='1301943104'] nope you are wrong ... There are enough evidences to proove great king krishnas existence...... But no evidence to prrove ramas existence...... On the same lines for example there is no historical evidence to proove socrates existence.... No one else wrote about socrates existence except plato... So many historians believe socrates can be a created historic figure.... Likewas king rama... We read mostly about him through valmiki... But still many tribes narrate folk tales of lord rama for years... Though there are any scholarly knowledge exchanged between them from aristocratic or civilised tribes.... And our lord Venkateswara too once a normal peasent lived in the valley of nilgiris....... On the same lines christ was a enhanced character to make a rebelion to fight against the higher aristocrates.... Even his appearence slighty normadic is changed much a greek look ... Just for soldiers to belive he was took the shape of god for them.... In fact christwas a highly talented healing therapist and perfect hypnotist.... [/quote] good post..
Potugaadu Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 evaro BC antaaru enduku ani adigaaru evaro because he is real okalu reply ichaaru i)Christ was not born or died on 1 AD ii)Roman calender follow avuthunnaam kaabatti..ee Jan to dec If we are following Indian calender(Vikrama) it will be based on Vikramaditya's ascension if its muslim calender,its just 1500 years old Jewish calender and chinese are also older iii)Just because manam Jan 1 new year chesukuntunnaam(siggu lekundaa Roman/christian di) ani Ugadi telugu new year kaakundaa podu
Bairagi Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 the one that has a beginning has an ending ani krishnude seppaad
HAPPYLESS Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 [quote name='kakatiya' timestamp='1339297459' post='1301943104'] nope you are wrong ... There are enough evidences to proove great king krishnas existence...... But no evidence to prrove ramas existence...... On the same lines for example there is no historical evidence to proove socrates existence.... No one else wrote about socrates existence except plato... So many historians believe socrates can be a created historic figure.... Likewas king rama... We read mostly about him through valmiki... But still many tribes narrate folk tales of lord rama for years... Though there are any scholarly knowledge exchanged between them from aristocratic or civilised tribes.... And our lord Venkateswara too once a normal peasent lived in the valley of nilgiris....... On the same lines christ was a enhanced character to make a rebelion to fight against the higher aristocrates.... Even his appearence slighty normadic is changed much a greek look ... Just for soldiers to belive he was took the shape of god for them.... [b]In fact christwas a highly talented healing therapist and perfect hypnotist....[/b] [/quote] oka movie lo untadhi believable explanation
Bairagi Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 kakatiya kurrodki intha talent vundani esfect seyyaledu...
usbabu Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 Kurukshetra Banyan Tree....as per wiki... [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/71/Jyotisar_Banyan.gif[/img]
dalapathi Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 [quote name='usbabu' timestamp='1339307098' post='1301943951'] Kurukshetra Banyan Tree....as per wiki... [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/71/Jyotisar_Banyan.gif[/img] [/quote] intha chinnagaa vundendhi
manjunath455 Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 [quote name='mustang302' timestamp='1339296366' post='1301943024'] Coz...Mr.JC is the real person...and all our indian mitholigies are stories...!! [/quote] nee mokam em kaad.asalu jesus devue kaadu human antaru. ayane eppudu devudani cheppukoledu. coming to ur point. mottam world accept chestondi kabatti ala bc ani seffaru.
manjunath455 Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 [quote name='kakatiya' timestamp='1339297459' post='1301943104'] nope you are wrong ... There are enough evidences to proove great king krishnas existence...... But no evidence to prrove ramas existence...... On the same lines for example there is no historical evidence to proove socrates existence.... No one else wrote about socrates existence except plato... So many historians believe socrates can be a created historic figure.... Likewas king rama... We read mostly about him through valmiki... But still many tribes narrate folk tales of lord rama for years... Though there are any scholarly knowledge exchanged between them from aristocratic or civilised tribes.... And our lord Venkateswara too once a normal peasent lived in the valley of nilgiris....... On the same lines christ was a enhanced character to make a rebelion to fight against the higher aristocrates.... Even his appearence slighty normadic is changed much a greek look ... Just for soldiers to belive he was took the shape of god for them.... In fact christwas a highly talented healing therapist and perfect hypnotist.... [/quote] gp ba. aa proofs kida ikkada vey ba. mari ramudu vunnadani parnasaala, inka chaala places lo tirigantlu nenu ekkado chadivanu [quote name='Potugaadu' timestamp='1339299188' post='1301943241'] evaro BC antaaru enduku ani adigaaru evaro because he is real okalu reply ichaaru i)Christ was not born or died on 1 AD ii)Roman calender follow avuthunnaam kaabatti..ee Jan to dec If we are following Indian calender(Vikrama) it will be based on Vikramaditya's ascension if its muslim calender,its just 1500 years old Jewish calender and chinese are also older iii)Just because manam Jan 1 new year chesukuntunnaam(siggu lekundaa Roman/christian di) ani Ugadi telugu new year kaakundaa podu [/quote] gp ba
Potugaadu Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 [quote name='KAALAANTAKUDU' timestamp='1339335693' post='1301944897'] nee mokam em kaad.asalu jesus devue kaadu human antaru. ayane eppudu devudani cheppukoledu. coming to ur point. mottam world accept chestondi kabatti ala bc ani seffaru. [/quote] Kaadu baa World antha kg lu use chesthunnaar kaabatti manaki unit of measure ledu anthaka mundu annatlu undi AD/BC roamn convention..manaki mana di vadilesaam adi use chesthunnaam.. mana original di 5200 vikramacalender romans ki descendents europeans ruled the world..so vaallavi vaaduthunnaam Just because manam antha nglish nerchesukuni maatlaaduthunnaam kaabatti..manaki anthakamundu maatlaadukovadaaniki bhasha ledu ante etta untundi
samantha. Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 [img]http://s5.tinypic.com/1zzgs3b_th.jpg[/img]
manjunath455 Posted June 10, 2012 Report Posted June 10, 2012 [quote name='Potugaadu' timestamp='1339336123' post='1301944912'] Kaadu baa World antha kg lu use chesthunnaar kaabatti manaki unit of measure ledu anthaka mundu annatlu undi AD/BC roamn convention..manaki mana di vadilesaam adi use chesthunnaam.. mana original di 5200 vikramacalender romans ki descendents europeans ruled the world..so vaallavi vaaduthunnaam Just because manam antha nglish nerchesukuni maatlaaduthunnaam kaabatti..manaki anthakamundu maatlaadukovadaaniki bhasha ledu ante etta untundi [/quote] ba nakoka doubt. prati calendar ki oka end year vuntunda?? naku eppati nundo e doubt vundi. aa vikrama calendar gurinchi inka info vunte vey ba
Recommended Posts