Spartan Posted August 11, 2012 Report Posted August 11, 2012 It sucked.......in screenplay and direction.... if u want to focus only on Stunts and Action sequences....cud have done it as jus any other movie...not a sequel for Bourne...
Betting Bangarraju Posted August 11, 2012 Report Posted August 11, 2012 [url="http://www.andhrafriends.com/topic/320388-okeokkasaari-sogasu-choodatarama/page__st__60"]http://www.andhrafri...ma/page__st__60[/url] As for this movie, it is a bit scrappy and all over the place, and there is a baffling plot-hole, or plot-eccentricity, concerning the nature of Cross's final confrontation. But it has plenty of energy and drive, and Jeremy Renner is really good, better as a Bourne-y agent than Matt Damon, tougher and more grizzled-looking, more convincing as the professional soldier who has grown careworn and disillusioned in the public service. I can imagine Renner going rogue, but I often had a tough job imagining smooth-faced Damon going rogue from the cub scouts.
Yuva Nataratna Posted August 11, 2012 Report Posted August 11, 2012 [img]http://www.desigifs.com/sites/default/files/Brahmi-13.gif?1342329916[/img][img]http://www.desigifs.com/sites/default/files/Brahmi-13.gif?1342329916[/img]
Recommended Posts