sillynivas Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 [img]http://imageshack.us/scaled/large/23/img2232i.jpg[/img]
superhit Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 Good post... Just 2 lanes a side Aaaaaaa???? Yekkuva vunte better kadaa
yellowyellow_shittyfellow Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 [quote name='superhit' timestamp='1368939386' post='1303771416'] Good post... Just 2 lanes a side Aaaaaaa???? Yekkuva vunte better kadaa [/quote] adi flyover anukunnava ..leka national highway anukunnava??
sillynivas Posted May 19, 2013 Author Report Posted May 19, 2013 [quote name='superhit' timestamp='1368939386' post='1303771416'] Good post... Just 2 lanes a side Aaaaaaa???? Yekkuva vunte better kadaa [/quote] Avunu..Govt ki burra undadu.. daily 1 lakh vehicles cross avutayani estimate ichinodu..inko 2 lanes esthe vadebba sommem poddi.. inka public kooda anthe.. ninna ne oka accident anta.. [color=#3F3F3F][font=georgia][size=4][left]"Hours after the new flyover was opened, an accident involving a two-wheeler and a car took place on the stretch, causing serious injuries to two."-TOI[/left][/size][/font][/color]
superhit Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 [quote name='sillynivas' timestamp='1368939682' post='1303771437'] Avunu..Govt ki burra undadu.. daily 1 lakh vehicles cross avutayani estimate ichinodu..inko 2 lanes esthe vadebba sommem poddi.. inka public kooda anthe.. ninna ne oka accident anta.. [color=#3F3F3F][font=georgia][size=4][left]"Hours after the new flyover was opened, an accident involving a two-wheeler and a car took place on the stretch, causing serious injuries to two."-TOI[/left][/size][/font][/color] [/quote] to hear that .. I travelled many times on that route. Traffic is too much for sure.
superhit Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 [quote name='LOVE_GURU' timestamp='1368939634' post='1303771434'] adi flyover anukunnava ..leka national highway anukunnava?? [/quote] Agreed that its not NH.....but, traffic heavy baa....see the above post from other fellow member about the situation
yellowyellow_shittyfellow Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 [quote name='superhit' timestamp='1368940323' post='1303771477'] Agreed that its not NH.....but, traffic heavy baa....see the above post from other fellow member about the situation [/quote] telusu vaa.. nene enno sarlu taffic jam lo irukkupoya a road lo... but idi start chese more than 5 yrs ayyindi.. ippatiki complete chesaru .. inka 6 line ..8 line lu ante ..manam musili vallam aipotham pakkaga
moviefan Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 hitech nunchi kukatpalli ki povali ante mental yekkedi.... yenni years kattaru baasu idi
ajnabee Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 [quote name='Jambal_haat' timestamp='1368941113' post='1303771518'] hitech nunchi kukatpalli ki povali ante mental yekkedi.... yenni years kattaru baasu idi [/quote] 7 yrs
JAPAN Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 kukatpally to hitech poyevallu..............inka airport ki poye vallu..........traffic too much vuntadhi.......... ee hyd anthe enni flyovers vesina ..emi chesina aa traffic tagge samasye ledhu
AndhraAkilesh Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 Abbbooo appatlo aaa hitech city station daggara road ghoramga vundedi rain vasthe rail bridge kinda motham water ye ...
fatso Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 [size=2][img]http://www.kukatpallynow.com/templates/kukatpallynow/images/HITECOpensSmall.jpg[/img][/size] [size=2] [/size] [size=2]After a long struggle, the flyover was finally opened on May 18, 2013 by JP. [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVdIkAetPDc&feature=share"]Watch[/url] the YouTube video of JP's speech during the opening.[/size] [size=2] [/size] [size=2]If there is one problem we can highlight in Kukatpally, it is the vexed issue of the HITEC City flyover. A third of the complaints we received were about this issue. A few people asked us to travel during the rush hour to know what the pain is. Some of us volunteers did and are well aware of it.[/size] [size=2] [/size] [size=2]Proof of JP's continuing monitoring of this issue: [url="http://www.kukatpallynow.com/templates/kukatpallynow/images/traffic/FlyoverJune2012-1.jpg"]News Item 1[/url], [url="http://www.kukatpallynow.com/templates/kukatpallynow/images/traffic/FlyoverJune2012-2.jpg"]News Item 2[/url] and [url="http://www.kukatpallynow.com/templates/kukatpallynow/images/traffic/FlyoverJune2012-3.jpg"]News Item 3[/url].[/size] [size=2] [/size] [size=2]Instead of giving abstract speeches about the 'system', this is an attempt to list out the origin and progress of this issue so that the citizens can see for themselves what we have done and what we have not done.[/size] [b]The story of the HITEC City Flover[/b] [list] [*]The flyover was sanctioned in 2006. As is usual with government projects, the route was checked only superficially and it was not completely analyzed. The construction commenced. [*]When the construction approached the railway lines, the railway department got involved and objected. Since the flyover would go over [i]their[/i] proposed electric lines, they put a hurdle that the construction cannot proceed. Now we have a deadlock. [*]This is when JP got elected (2009). JP and team realized that political pressure will not work because the railway department will simply show the rules that the existing design violates the railway rules. [*]With his vision and experience JP understood that dead lock will not be resolved soon, so he immediately worked on providing a temporary solution by converting the existing culvert road to one way and constructed a new road under the next culvert near Indu Project. This provided temporary relief as the traffic under the railway culverts become one way. But as the surrounding population grew exponentially, the traffic jams started again. [*]In parallel, we now started pushing the HMDA department to come-up with an alternate design. HDMA agreed to start working on the alternate design. It took a few months to see this through and in an example of what we were doing in the interim, JP had to make nearly 40 phone calls to get the design file passed. The design was approved in mid-2011. [*]Now we have the design but there is no budget. We had to find sources for the funds within the department. In a specific instance which all volunteers remember, we had to move between 4 offices on a single day like a chase scene in a movie to get signatures from four principal secretaries. Finally in October 2011, we have the money. [*]We have a new design and the budget and the next step is for all the departments to agree to it. But the rivalry is so high that it took months and months of effort and meetings to make them sit and agree to all aspects. This finally happened in 2012. [*]2012: Things were all set and all indications are that the flyover will be completed in 2012, the bulk of the construction happened in this year. JP also met the CM twice to ensure that there are no more delays. Things got delayed for a few months because of unforeseen issues like the non-availability of high grade steel in the market when it was needed. [*]2013: Victory finally! The final stages also needed enormous coordination with the railway schedules as trains had to be diverted when work on the track was being done. [/list]
Ufffff Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 [quote name='fatso' timestamp='1368954838' post='1303771715'] [size=2][img]http://www.kukatpallynow.com/templates/kukatpallynow/images/HITECOpensSmall.jpg[/img][/size] [size=2] [/size] [size=2]After a long struggle, the flyover was finally opened on May 18, 2013 by JP. [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVdIkAetPDc&feature=share"]Watch[/url] the YouTube video of JP's speech during the opening.[/size] [size=2]If there is one problem we can highlight in Kukatpally, it is the vexed issue of the HITEC City flyover. A third of the complaints we received were about this issue. A few people asked us to travel during the rush hour to know what the pain is. Some of us volunteers did and are well aware of it.[/size] [size=2]Proof of JP's continuing monitoring of this issue: [url="http://www.kukatpallynow.com/templates/kukatpallynow/images/traffic/FlyoverJune2012-1.jpg"]News Item 1[/url], [url="http://www.kukatpallynow.com/templates/kukatpallynow/images/traffic/FlyoverJune2012-2.jpg"]News Item 2[/url] and [url="http://www.kukatpallynow.com/templates/kukatpallynow/images/traffic/FlyoverJune2012-3.jpg"]News Item 3[/url].[/size] [size=2]Instead of giving abstract speeches about the 'system', this is an attempt to list out the origin and progress of this issue so that the citizens can see for themselves what we have done and what we have not done.[/size] [b]The story of the HITEC City Flover[/b] [list] [*]The flyover was sanctioned in 2006. As is usual with government projects, the route was checked only superficially and it was not completely analyzed. The construction commenced. [*]When the construction approached the railway lines, the railway department got involved and objected. Since the flyover would go over [i]their[/i] proposed electric lines, they put a hurdle that the construction cannot proceed. Now we have a deadlock. [*]This is when JP got elected (2009). JP and team realized that political pressure will not work because the railway department will simply show the rules that the existing design violates the railway rules. [*]With his vision and experience JP understood that dead lock will not be resolved soon, so he immediately worked on providing a temporary solution by converting the existing culvert road to one way and constructed a new road under the next culvert near Indu Project. This provided temporary relief as the traffic under the railway culverts become one way. But as the surrounding population grew exponentially, the traffic jams started again. [*]In parallel, we now started pushing the HMDA department to come-up with an alternate design. HDMA agreed to start working on the alternate design. It took a few months to see this through and in an example of what we were doing in the interim, JP had to make nearly 40 phone calls to get the design file passed. The design was approved in mid-2011. [*]Now we have the design but there is no budget. We had to find sources for the funds within the department. In a specific instance which all volunteers remember, we had to move between 4 offices on a single day like a chase scene in a movie to get signatures from four principal secretaries. Finally in October 2011, we have the money. [*]We have a new design and the budget and the next step is for all the departments to agree to it. But the rivalry is so high that it took months and months of effort and meetings to make them sit and agree to all aspects. This finally happened in 2012. [*]2012: Things were all set and all indications are that the flyover will be completed in 2012, the bulk of the construction happened in this year. JP also met the CM twice to ensure that there are no more delays. Things got delayed for a few months because of unforeseen issues like the non-availability of high grade steel in the market when it was needed. [*]2013: Victory finally! The final stages also needed enormous coordination with the railway schedules as trains had to be diverted when work on the track was being done. [/list] [/quote] Good Info.
GULABJAM Posted May 19, 2013 Report Posted May 19, 2013 GP[img]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-hpZxajHttwo/UY6BMSI_JqI/AAAAAAAAEtg/1anSk_Lo0tA/s1600/brahmi31.gif[/img]
Recommended Posts