rikki Posted June 3, 2013 Author Report Posted June 3, 2013 thanks BBB and all for valuable discussion..
BikerBoy Posted June 3, 2013 Report Posted June 3, 2013 Sports car 'used' konadam koncham risk ae bhayya....Mustang konataniki velinapud aa dealer chepaadu
Terminator II Posted June 3, 2013 Report Posted June 3, 2013 contact reddygaru uncle.. he owns a camaro
Guest Lafoot_Mod Posted June 3, 2013 Report Posted June 3, 2013 [quote name='Baava' timestamp='1370286249' post='1303818639'] Buy mustang 5.0 ..it's lottt more better [/quote]
gangster_rap Posted June 3, 2013 Report Posted June 3, 2013 [quote name='zuuzuubee' timestamp='1370288144' post='1303818788'] [/quote] Why laughing??ento cheppu navvuta nen kuda...vishyam leka navvute pichodivanukuntaru... [size=4] [/size]
Guest Lafoot_Mod Posted June 4, 2013 Report Posted June 4, 2013 [quote name='Baava' timestamp='1370292008' post='1303819100'] Why laughing??ento cheppu navvuta nen kuda...vishyam leka navvute pichodivanukuntaru... [/quote] First thing camaro adigithe mustang konuko antunav... second camaro SS has more power, more torque, better handling times....more stylish.... aaa angle lo gt better annavo ardham kaka navvukuntuna
gangster_rap Posted June 4, 2013 Report Posted June 4, 2013 [quote name='zuuzuubee' timestamp='1370304921' post='1303819843'] First thing camaro adigithe mustang konuko antunav... second camaro SS has more power, more torque, better handling times....more stylish.... aaa angle lo gt better annavo ardham kaka navvukuntuna [/quote] 1.edo better car ani cheptunnanu..so adi edaina kavochu.. 2.ikkada review vundi 2012 camaro ss n mustang gt di..chadivi telusuko which one is better ..appudu navvuko.. [url="http://www.edmunds.com/chevrolet/camaro/2012/"]http://www.edmunds.com/chevrolet/camaro/2012/[/url] [url="http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/2012/"]http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/2012/[/url] andulo anni mention chesadu 0-60 times..mileage n driving impressions...more HP vunte adi super car avvadu..
Guest Lafoot_Mod Posted June 4, 2013 Report Posted June 4, 2013 [quote name='Baava' timestamp='1370305865' post='1303819868'] 1.edo better car ani cheptunnanu..so adi edaina kavochu.. 2.ikkada review vundi 2012 camaro ss n mustang gt di..chadivi telusuko which one is better ..appudu navvuko.. [url="http://www.edmunds.com/chevrolet/camaro/2012/"]http://www.edmunds.c...et/camaro/2012/[/url] [url="http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/2012/"]http://www.edmunds.c...d/mustang/2012/[/url] andulo anni mention chesadu 0-60 times..mileage n driving impressions...more HP vunte adi super car avvadu.. [/quote] nuvvu em chadhivavo niku clarity undha....akkada em undhi okkasari ikkada padeyi chudham..... comapre chesi chudu bhayya....rendu reviews chadhavadam kadhu.... [url="http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1303_2013_chevrolet_camaro_ss_1le_ford_mustang_gt_track_pack/viewall.html"]http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1303_2013_chevrolet_camaro_ss_1le_ford_mustang_gt_track_pack/viewall.html[/url] opika unte adhi chadhuvuko, doubts unte adugu....
gangster_rap Posted June 4, 2013 Report Posted June 4, 2013 [quote name='zuuzuubee' timestamp='1370307564' post='1303819914'] nuvvu em chadhivavo niku clarity undha....akkada em undhi okkasari ikkada padeyi chudham..... comapre chesi chudu bhayya....rendu reviews chadhavadam kadhu.... [url="http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1303_2013_chevrolet_camaro_ss_1le_ford_mustang_gt_track_pack/viewall.html"]http://www.motortren...ck/viewall.html[/url] opika unte adhi chadhuvuko, doubts unte adugu.... [/quote] neeku em ardam kaledo cheppu aa reviews lo ..akkada clear ga vundi kada..stiill no understand??
Guest Lafoot_Mod Posted June 4, 2013 Report Posted June 4, 2013 [quote name='Baava' timestamp='1370308371' post='1303819926'] neeku em ardam kaledo cheppu aa reviews lo ..akkada clear ga vundi kada..stiill no understand?? [/quote] naku em ardham kale....ela better anipinchindhi niku cheppava.... compare new versions.....kothavi vachayi kadha.....read 2013 review and tell me, in which way mustang is better
gangster_rap Posted June 4, 2013 Report Posted June 4, 2013 [quote name='zuuzuubee' timestamp='1370308602' post='1303819932'] naku em ardham kale....ela better anipinchindhi niku cheppava.... compare new versions.....kothavi vachayi kadha.....read 2013 review and tell me, in which way mustang is better [/quote] Camaro [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]The Camaro SS gets a 6.2-liter V8 that produces 426 hp and 420 lb-ft of torque with the standard six-speed manual and 400 hp and 410 lb-ft with the six-speed automatic. With the manual, the SS hits 60 mph in 5 seconds. EPA-estimated fuel economy is 16 mpg city/24 mpg highway and 19 mpg with the manual. The automatic is only slightly less fuel-efficient at 15/24/18, thanks to less engine power as well as cylinder-deactivation technology.[/size][/font][/color] [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]That all said, [b]due to its subpar outward visibility that sometimes makes it hard to judge when pushing hard on a twisty road, the Camaro drives like a big car, not a small one[/b]. The car's substantial weight doesn't help matters either. And this has as much impact on daily driving as it does on the drives you take for fun. Nevertheless, the Camaro is actually quite civilized around town, with a comfortable ride and minimal wind and road noise.[/size][/font][/color] [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]Mustang[/size][/font][/color] [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]The Mustang GT steps up to a 5.0-liter V8 good for 412 hp and 390 lb-ft of torque. Both have a standard six-speed manual transmission, while a six-speed automatic is optional. As if this isn't enough, the Boss 302's 5.0-liter V8 ups power output to 444 hp and 380 lb-ft of torque. (An automatic transmission is not available for the Boss 302, however.) [/size][/font][/color][color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]The GT has an 18/25/21 mpg rating with the automatic, and 17/26/20 mpg with the manual. [/size][/font][/color] [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]Regardless of which 2012 Ford Mustang you choose, you're in for a wild ride. The base V6 makes more than enough power for the average driver and plenty of oomph to satisfy a majority of driving enthusiasts as well. The V8 engines take performance up a few notches with gobs of torque and a glorious exhaust note. Driving enthusiasts will naturally want to select the manual transmission, though the automatic isn't a bad choice; it's prone to early upshifts in order to maximize fuel economy, but there's enough torque to keep the Mustang ably motivated.[/size][/font][/color] [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]Within the pony car triumvirate of the Camaro, Challenger and Mustang, the Ford is lightest on its feet. On a curvy road, the Mustang responds eagerly to steering inputs and feels controlled and manageable. Due to the Mustang's solid rear axle design, though, the rear of the car can get a bit twitchy when encountering midcorner bumps.[/size][/font][/color] [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]i am comparing 2012 as thread stater is looking for used ones...also the one in bold is one considerable issue ..i have driven camaro..also there is no point in comparing track tests as not every one will take them to track.u shuld see the driving impressions[/size][/font][/color]
mustang302 Posted June 4, 2013 Report Posted June 4, 2013 [quote name='Donnie' timestamp='1370273286' post='1303817784'] want to buy a used one...anyone using here reviews please thanks [/quote] used camero naa...oka 40K milage,model 2012 itae vakey..or else daani daggarakae vellaku nayanaaa[img]https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-9z79jWKLQYE/T-eJ41vDzQI/AAAAAAAAIT8/RmKjQnBaCHI/s150/PK-67.gif[/img]
Guest Lafoot_Mod Posted June 4, 2013 Report Posted June 4, 2013 [quote name='Baava' timestamp='1370309463' post='1303819964'] Camaro [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]The Camaro SS gets a 6.2-liter V8 that produces 426 hp and 420 lb-ft of torque with the standard six-speed manual and 400 hp and 410 lb-ft with the six-speed automatic. With the manual, the SS hits 60 mph in 5 seconds. EPA-estimated fuel economy is 16 mpg city/24 mpg highway and 19 mpg with the manual. The automatic is only slightly less fuel-efficient at 15/24/18, thanks to less engine power as well as cylinder-deactivation technology.[/size][/font][/color] [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]That all said, [b]due to its subpar outward visibility that sometimes makes it hard to judge when pushing hard on a twisty road, the Camaro drives like a big car, not a small one[/b]. The car's substantial weight doesn't help matters either. And this has as much impact on daily driving as it does on the drives you take for fun. Nevertheless, the Camaro is actually quite civilized around town, with a comfortable ride and minimal wind and road noise.[/size][/font][/color] [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]Mustang[/size][/font][/color] [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]The Mustang GT steps up to a 5.0-liter V8 good for 412 hp and 390 lb-ft of torque. Both have a standard six-speed manual transmission, while a six-speed automatic is optional. As if this isn't enough, the Boss 302's 5.0-liter V8 ups power output to 444 hp and 380 lb-ft of torque. (An automatic transmission is not available for the Boss 302, however.) [/size][/font][/color][color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]The GT has an 18/25/21 mpg rating with the automatic, and 17/26/20 mpg with the manual. [/size][/font][/color] [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]Regardless of which 2012 Ford Mustang you choose, you're in for a wild ride. The base V6 makes more than enough power for the average driver and plenty of oomph to satisfy a majority of driving enthusiasts as well. The V8 engines take performance up a few notches with gobs of torque and a glorious exhaust note. Driving enthusiasts will naturally want to select the manual transmission, though the automatic isn't a bad choice; it's prone to early upshifts in order to maximize fuel economy, but there's enough torque to keep the Mustang ably motivated.[/size][/font][/color] [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]Within the pony car triumvirate of the Camaro, Challenger and Mustang, the Ford is lightest on its feet. On a curvy road, the Mustang responds eagerly to steering inputs and feels controlled and manageable. Due to the Mustang's solid rear axle design, though, the rear of the car can get a bit twitchy when encountering midcorner bumps.[/size][/font][/color] [color=#000000][font=Verdana, sans-serif][size=3]i am comparing 2012 as thread stater is looking for used ones...also the one in bold is one considerable issue ..i have driven camaro..also there is no point in comparing track tests as not every one will take them to track.u shuld see the driving impressions[/size][/font][/color] [/quote] I OWNED both camaro and mustang....both are great cars....visibility issue ah...car margins teliyinavallaki adhi....antha novice driver aytha sports car waste vadiki.... ayna evadi ischtam vadidhi le, manaki godava endhuku gani.... i prefer CAMARO....better MPG, more bhp, better torque, 0-60 faster, sharper looks....thats all matter for me.....
.thumb.jpg.ce42bb16ec102475a78c2087ce269c7d.jpg)
.thumb.gif.343fe49c7e1c507ae0056326bd8cf77e.gif)
Recommended Posts