posaanisam Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 [b] Couples who have premarital sex to be considered ‘married,’ says HC[/b] [color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,] If any unmarried couple of the right legal age “indulge in sexual gratification,” this will be considered a valid marriage and they could be termed “husband and wife,” the Madras High Court has ruled in a judgment that gives a new twist to the concept of premarital sex.[/font][/color][color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,] The court said that if a bachelor has completed 21 years of age and an unmarried woman 18 years, they have acquired the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Constitution. “Consequently, if any couple choose to consummate their sexual cravings, then that act becomes a total commitment with adherence to all consequences that may follow, except on certain exceptional considerations.”[/font][/color][color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,] The court said marriage formalities as per various religious customs such as the tying of a mangalsutra, the exchange of garlands and rings or the registering of a marriage were only to comply with religious customs for the satisfaction of society.[/font][/color][color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,] The court further said if necessary either party to a relationship could approach a Family Court for a declaration of marital status by supplying documentary proof for a sexual relationship. Once such a declaration was obtained, a woman could establish herself as the man’s wife in government records. “Legal rights applicable to normal wedded couples will also be applicable to couples who have had sexual relationships which are established."[/font][/color][color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,] The court also said if after having a sexual relationship, the couple decided to separate due to difference of opinion, the ‘husband’ could not marry without getting a decree of divorce from the ‘wife’.[/font][/color][color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,] Justice C.S. Karnan passed the order on Monday while modifying an April 2006 judgment of a Coimbatore family court in a maintenance case involving a couple. The lower court had ordered the man to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 500 to the couple’s two children and Rs. 1000 as litigation expenses. The lower court observed that the woman’s wedding with the man had not been proved by documentary evidence. Hence, she was not entitled to maintenance.[/font][/color][color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,] In her appeal to the High Court, the woman’s counsel contended that she was legally married and had two children in wedlock.[/font][/color][color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,] Justice Karnan said he was of the view that a valid marriage did not necessarily mean that all the customary rights pertaining to the married couple are to be followed and subsequently solemnised. In the present case, the woman and her husband had no encumbrance or other disqualification for solemnising their wedding as per their customs. For solemnising a wedding, legal aspects should be placed on a higher scale than the customary aspects. In this case, the man had signed in the ‘live birth report’ of his second child and given his consent for a Caesarean section for its birth. As such, he had officially admitted that she was his wife.[/font][/color][color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,] “Without legal encumbrance or third party interference or without affecting third party rights, both the petitioner and the respondent lived together as spouses and begot two children.” Therefore, the question of an illegitimate relationship did not arise. Wedding solemnisation was only a customary right, but not a mandatory one. Hence, the judge said, he was treating the couple as spouses in normal life.[/font][/color][color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,] “It is not disputed that the petitioner has been a spinster before she gave birth and that the respondent was a bachelor before developing sexual relationship with the petitioner. Both of them led their marital life under the same shelter and begot two children. Therefore, the petitioner’s rank has been elevated as the `wife’ of the respondent and likewise, the respondent’s rank has been elevated as the `husband’ of the petitioner. Therefore, the children born to them are legitimate children and the petitioner is the legitimate wife of the respondent.”[/font][/color][color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,] The judge directed the woman’s husband to pay her a monthly maintenance of Rs.500 from the date of petition, i.e. from September 2000. The arrears of maintenance up to May this year should be paid within a period of three months.[/font][/color]
posaanisam Posted June 18, 2013 Author Report Posted June 18, 2013 [img]http://i.myniceprofile.com/214/21422.gif[/img][size=4] [/size]
smilysubbu Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 Ilaaa aithe India lo chaala mandiki chaala marriages ayipoyaayi kadaa
sigsegv Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 asaula marriage ki sex ki link pettadam valla anni problems ...
matrix_09 Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 ee Chennai vallu inka oka 50 years back aa vunnaru. Inka nayam cheyyi pattukunte pelli ayinatle anale Yedhavalu
cherlapalli_jailer Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 i think its wrong what if post marriage sex with another girl/boy other than wife/hubby? will it be considered as divorce and re marry? then perfect ...free world
Nellore Pedda reddy Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 high court ilanti burra thakkuva judgements pass cheyadam endo....aravollu theda ani maro sari prove chesukunnaru
Nellore Pedda reddy Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 [quote name='Posanism' timestamp='1371537418' post='1303865752'] [color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,][size=5][b]The court further said if necessary either party to a relationship could approach a Family Court for a declaration of marital status by supplying documentary proof for a sexual relationship[/b][/size]. Once such a declaration was obtained, a woman could establish herself as the man’s wife in government records. “Legal rights applicable to normal wedded couples will also be applicable to couples who have had sexual relationships which are established."[/font][/color] [color=#3B3A39][font=Georgia,]The court also said if after having a sexual relationship, the couple decided to separate due to difference of opinion, the ‘husband’ could not marry without getting a decree of divorce from the ‘wife’.[/font][/color] [/quote] inka nayam sex chesthunnappudu video teesi proof ga submit cheyali analedu
AndhraAkilesh Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 condom vadithe kuda marriage ayinatlena?
Nellore Pedda reddy Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 [quote name='IamN0tTrouble' timestamp='1371569294' post='1303866434'] condom vadithe kuda marriage ayinatlena? [/quote] vesinattu proof undali....paper work kavali
CHANAKYA Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 [quote name='Posanism' timestamp='1371537455' post='1303865754'] [img]http://i.myniceprofile.com/214/21422.gif[/img] [/quote] rofl... deadly... [img]http://i56.tinypic.com/2w2r5gm.jpg[/img]
AndhraAkilesh Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 [quote name='Nellore Pedda reddy' timestamp='1371569392' post='1303866443'] vesinattu proof undali....paper work kavali [/quote] bed meeda sperm padakunda jagrath padali ithe
CHANAKYA Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 [quote name='Nellore Pedda reddy' timestamp='1371569064' post='1303866415'] inka nayam sex chesthunnappudu video teesi proof ga submit cheyali analedu [/quote] ade kadaa...
CHANAKYA Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 [quote name='Nellore Pedda reddy' timestamp='1371569392' post='1303866443'] vesinattu proof undali....paper work kavali [/quote] paper work..... condom konnatl receipts submit cheyyali
AndhraAkilesh Posted June 18, 2013 Report Posted June 18, 2013 [quote name='CHANAKYA' timestamp='1371569516' post='1303866450'] paper work..... condom konnatl receipts submit cheyyali [/quote] sex ayyaka aaa condom nu jagrathaga padeyali.. vallaki dorikithe proofs dorikinatle
Recommended Posts