Tg Ki Melika - Article 371 (D)

[bindazking]

[img]https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1384165_381322945331147_1606664745_n.jpg[/img]

[sandy437]

Feeling better.......

[bindazking]

andhuke.. TG la.. KCR Gandhi ..statements.. ee saari aapithe.. yuddame.. ani ..

ante vaallaki mundhe hints vachaayi anukuntaa

[bindazking]

[img]https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/988739_379427165520725_2106915236_n.jpg[/img]

[bindazking]

[img]https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1385379_380696185393823_1223039479_n.jpg[/img]

[KadapaKingg]

Idi nijamena.. calling Matrix..

[bindazking]

[quote name='TheSamurai' timestamp='1381968719' post='1304425705']
Idi nijamena.. calling Matrix..
[/quote]

Matrix enduku vaa.. he is not human being.. he just provokes.. I avoid.. his pages and posts..

[Khadgam]

[b]Article 371D[/b]
Interestingly, even the special provisions under Part XXI of the Constitution were altered by state reorganisation legislation by Parliament, and only when the entire article had to be replaced was it done by constitutional amendments. Thus, Article 371 was amended by the Bombay Reorganisation Act of 1960, when Maharashtra and Gujarat were formed. Similarly, Article 371B was amended by the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971. If a bill intending to form a new state is passed by Parliament, that itself effects required changes in nomenclature in these special provisions. [color=#ff0000]However, when Parliament intends to make special provisions and make substantial change like deletion or replacement of entire provisions in Part XXI, a constitutional amendment will be required. [/color]In 1971 and 1973, the 27th and 32nd Amendments were made that substantially amended this part.
Article 371E was added to constitute a Central university in Hyderabad. Once the university got established, the Article became useless. [color=#ff0000]Similarly, if Telangana is carved out, Article 371D becomes redundant and thus needs to be removed by an amendment to the Constitution. It’s an enabling provision empowering the executive just to make an order. Earlier, Article 371 was facilitating Regional Committee for Telangana within Andhra Pradesh. [b]But 371D will not be an impediment in the formation of Telangana.[/b][/color]

[i]The writer is professor and coordinator, Centre for Media Law & Public Policy, NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad[/i]

[dallascowboys]

[quote name='Khadgam' timestamp='1381972517' post='1304425819']
[b]Article 371D[/b]
Interestingly, even the special provisions under Part XXI of the Constitution were altered by state reorganisation legislation by Parliament, and only when the entire article had to be replaced was it done by constitutional amendments. Thus, Article 371 was amended by the Bombay Reorganisation Act of 1960, when Maharashtra and Gujarat were formed. Similarly, Article 371B was amended by the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971. If a bill intending to form a new state is passed by Parliament, that itself effects required changes in nomenclature in these special provisions. [color=#ff0000]However, when Parliament intends to make special provisions and make substantial change like deletion or replacement of entire provisions in Part XXI, a constitutional amendment will be required. [/color]In 1971 and 1973, the 27th and 32nd Amendments were made that substantially amended this part.
Article 371E was added to constitute a Central university in Hyderabad. Once the university got established, the Article became useless. [color=#ff0000]Similarly, if Telangana is carved out, Article 371D becomes redundant and thus needs to be removed by an amendment to the Constitution. It’s an enabling provision empowering the executive just to make an order. Earlier, Article 371 was facilitating Regional Committee for Telangana within Andhra Pradesh. [b]But 371D will not be an impediment in the formation of Telangana.[/b][/color]

[i]The writer is professor and coordinator, Centre for Media Law & Public Policy, NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad[/i]
[/quote]
[img]http://www.desigifs.com/sites/default/files/cxcxcxcx.gif?1370182741[/img]super

[Bongu..Boshanam]

[Matrix_o9]

[quote name='TheSamurai' timestamp='1381968719' post='1304425705']
Idi nijamena.. calling Matrix..
[/quote]


Antha ledu bhayya , piccha lite [img]http://i43.tinypic.com/10rs938.gif[/img]. chusav ga Khadgam post.



villaku inka savaledhu asshha HYD meeda[img]http://i43.tinypic.com/10rs938.gif[/img]

[Tdp2014]

[quote name='bindazking' timestamp='1381968778' post='1304425709']


Matrix enduku vaa.. he is not human being.. he just provokes.. I avoid.. his pages and posts..
[/quote]
Gp ... U settler anthadu aggu ... Lol

[ravula]

[quote name='Khadgam' timestamp='1381972517' post='1304425819']
[b]Article 371D[/b]
Interestingly, even the special provisions under Part XXI of the Constitution were altered by state reorganisation legislation by Parliament, and only when the entire article had to be replaced was it done by constitutional amendments. Thus, Article 371 was amended by the Bombay Reorganisation Act of 1960, when Maharashtra and Gujarat were formed. Similarly, Article 371B was amended by the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971. If a bill intending to form a new state is passed by Parliament, that itself effects required changes in nomenclature in these special provisions. [color=#ff0000]However, when Parliament intends to make special provisions and make substantial change like deletion or replacement of entire provisions in Part XXI, a constitutional amendment will be required. [/color]In 1971 and 1973, the 27th and 32nd Amendments were made that substantially amended this part.
Article 371E was added to constitute a Central university in Hyderabad. Once the university got established, the Article became useless. [color=#ff0000]Similarly, if Telangana is carved out, Article 371D becomes redundant and thus needs to be removed by an amendment to the Constitution. It’s an enabling provision empowering the executive just to make an order. Earlier, Article 371 was facilitating Regional Committee for Telangana within Andhra Pradesh. [b]But 371D will not be an impediment in the formation of Telangana.[/b][/color]

[i]The writer is professor and coordinator, Centre for Media Law & Public Policy, NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad[/i]
[/quote]

nice point man

[bindazking]

[img]https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1385542_381363931993715_216470485_n.jpg[/img]

[micxas]

[quote name='Khadgam' timestamp='1381972517' post='1304425819']
[b]Article 371D[/b]
Interestingly, even the special provisions under Part XXI of the Constitution were altered by state reorganisation legislation by Parliament, and only when the entire article had to be replaced was it done by constitutional amendments. Thus, Article 371 was amended by the Bombay Reorganisation Act of 1960, when Maharashtra and Gujarat were formed. Similarly, Article 371B was amended by the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971. If a bill intending to form a new state is passed by Parliament, that itself effects required changes in nomenclature in these special provisions. [color=#ff0000]However, when Parliament intends to make special provisions and make substantial change like deletion or replacement of entire provisions in Part XXI, a constitutional amendment will be required. [/color]In 1971 and 1973, the 27th and 32nd Amendments were made that substantially amended this part.
Article 371E was added to constitute a Central university in Hyderabad. Once the university got established, the Article became useless. [color=#ff0000]Similarly, if Telangana is carved out, Article 371D becomes redundant and thus needs to be[/color][color=#0000ff] removed by an amendment to the Constitution[/color][color=#ff0000]. It’s an enabling provision empowering the executive just to make an order. Earlier, Article 371 was facilitating Regional Committee for Telangana within Andhra Pradesh. [b]But 371D will not be an impediment in the formation of Telangana.[/b][/color]

[i]The writer is professor and coordinator, Centre for Media Law & Public Policy, NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad[/i]
[/quote]
ante const.. amend cheyala ? daniki enta majority kavali .. ?